Barometer said:
FKAWBT is an acronym for a name that's too long and that I can't reveal here.
We figure that's what people are going to do with an acronym like FKAWBT. It can mean so much and we want to keep it a little mystery.
What...? you mean I'm not the only one who does that...??
Well,.. the reason I haven't posted on this one is mainly because it's a live jam.
First off,.. I'm not a big "live" fan. They always tend to have that... uh... "live" sound.

This is obviously nothing against you... I don't like live versions of pretty much any of my favorite songs. I'm a "studio" type of guy. I like nice, even mixes, perfect levels, proper compression (not
overcompression..

), tightly executed parts,.. etc. etc.
Secondly,.. I'm not a big "jam" fan. I'm not too hip on listening to extended five minute jams. Jams usually lend themselves to sloppy(er) playing and less cohesiveness. (well duh..

) which translates to more for me to have to nit-pick at.

(contrary to popular belief, I
don't take pleasure in finding as many "mistakes" as possible in people's mp3 submissions.

) Now,.. don't get me wrong. I love to
play five (or ten or thirty or whatever) minute jams.. but I wasn't really "coherent" in the 70's so I never got into that whole "never-ending jam" thing. (P.S. "coherent" does not mean that I was stoned..

It means I was too young.)
But,.. I did listen to both of these and they sounded just fine, as live jams go.

The band seems to be competent and it sounds like your studio work should come out nicely. I did like the git lick that comes in at 0:23 on "Spice". That was pretty catchy,.. but shortly after that it travels off into "jam" territory.

As for the over-all recording itself.. well.. it sounded very.... live.
WATYF