Distorted guitar mids

  • Thread starter Thread starter ecktronic
  • Start date Start date
btw you did get some great tones in that song.. sounds good...

Hey right on, man.

Ya know ... if you listen to that track, you'll probably notice there are several layers going on. If you focus on what's coming out of the left speaker, you might notice some high end harmonics going on, similar to what you hear on Eck's examples.

What happened there is that I made a compromise with the guitar player. I let him track with his tone ... but with the understanding that we'd do at least a few more layers with some other tones -- namely the ones that I would dial in / recommend. Ultimately, the ones that I recommended were a combination of a very midrange-oriented tone -- kind of like a "pignose" kinda' deal out of a smaller amp with very little highs or lows ... sort of the opposite of his tone, moreless.

This allowed me at least some flexibility at mixdown to kind of lightly mix in the second tone if it needed more midrange -- without having to resort to EQ.

Similarly, we also did a few tracks with the Mesa, but with the presence and gain turned considerably down; more to my own taste. Again, this just gave us more stuff to work with and balance out come mixdown. Overally, if you think the tone is too scooped out and lacks any midrange definition ... then you bring in just a hair of the "pignose" track (or rather, small combo amp track). If if it sounds too thin and hashy, then you bring in just a little more of the "lower-gain, no-presence" (chunky) track to breathe a little bit of dynamics and less fizz in to the mix.

In regards to this whole "presence" deal ... I just have very strong feelings about it all, because I think that any time you're dealing with artificial high end harmonics ... you're getting in to dangerous territory. Basically, any presence knob is going to attempt to accomplish the same end as a BBE sonic maximizer or an aural exciter. And the reason this stuff is dangerous is that it can very quickly seduce you in to over-use by throwing off your perspective. Seriously, after listening to stuff that has enough of the exciter in it ... your ears grow accustomed to it. Sometimes in a matter of minutes ... and then, you don't realize it's there. And obviously, it's happened to a lot of folks in this forum ... just as it's happened to the two guys at the local Music-go-round that I frequent on Milwaukee Ave. :D But we won't get too much in to that right now -- subject for another thread.

Basicall, "for most people" ... and there are exceptions, mind you, but they're rare ... but FOR MOST PEOPLE ... it only takes about 5 minutes of listening to anything with jacked up high end harmonics ... to completely throw off your ability to accurately listen. It's like you become deaf to certain frequencies, and before you know it ... you're turning it up because you think it sounds great that way. But give your ears a day or two of rest ... listen to it again, and at a reasonable volume, and suddenly you're hearing it for what it is; a pile of crap with a layer of squealy high end harmonics that drown out any definition; a problem that only compounds as you layer additional tracks on top of it.

So I'm not saying never to use any of it ... simply to use a lot less than you "think" you need or like. Turn it down to where you don't think there's nearly enough ... and you've probably hit on just the right amount. Similarly ... crank the gain until you think you're "almost there," and you're probably right on the mark. It's a psychology that can take some getting used to, obviously, but you can adjust.

.




.
 
Last edited:
that's a great idea!! I never really thought about double or triple tracking guitar all with different tones.. I sometimes use several mics at different distances away to capture the guitar.. usually a 57 close.. a pencil condenser about 3 or 4 feet away and a large diaphram condenser at the other end of the room..kinda ends up with a similar idea but in comparison (and because my room isn't overly treated) seems like it wouldn't work as well as you're technicque.. I will definately try this.
 
Alright, if anyone's interested ... I think the first song on the list "Blue Chair Monday" at least comes close to what I'd consider a decent guitar tone that I had a hand in. It wound up being a compromize. The guy got 1/2 his tone, and 1/2 mine, and it came out alright, I thought ...

http://www.nowhereradio.com/artists/album.php?aid=1298&alid=1359

.

Yeah that guitar sounds nice.
It doesn't have that pro sound although I cannot put my finger on what it could be. Maybe the low end isn't thick enough and the high mids are a bit too grizeley.
What is your opinion on what could be better about your guitar track here?
Less grizle in the high mids? Would that be less presence on the amp? ie less of the guitarists tone and more of your tone?

Cheers for posting this,
Eck
 
ie less of the guitarists tone and more of your tone?

You got it. :D

It's funny how it's easier to hear it in someone else's tracks than it is in your own, isn't it? i.e. for both of us.

What if just for shits/giggles I try a second mix ... only this time the way I would have mixed it if it were completely up to me?

.
 
that's a great idea!! I never really thought about double or triple tracking guitar all with different tones.. I sometimes use several mics at different distances away to capture the guitar.. usually a 57 close.. a pencil condenser about 3 or 4 feet away and a large diaphram condenser at the other end of the room..kinda ends up with a similar idea but in comparison (and because my room isn't overly treated) seems like it wouldn't work as well as you're technicque.. I will definately try this.


For my double track, I usually just turn the gain down just a touch and the mids up just a touch. Or vice versa depending on starting point.
 
i don't know what "pro tone" is being saught after here... chessrock's guitar sound here is great i think.. if by pro tone you mean that top 40's over produced sound that you'd hear on the latestest nickelback album then count me out.. it all varies anyway.. depending on what kinda music is being played.. although i love chessrock's distortion i'd never in a million years want this sound for my band... i'm into the less distortion..more of an overdrive sound.. almost raunchy yet still clear
check out "clear" by maritime http://www.myspace.com/maritimesongs

also check out no one will remember just because that song kicks ass


again it depends on the music
 
i don't know what "pro tone" is being saught after here... chessrock's guitar sound here is great i think.. if by pro tone you mean that top 40's over produced sound that you'd hear on the latestest nickelback album then count me out.. it all varies anyway.. depending on what kinda music is being played.. although i love chessrock's distortion i'd never in a million years want this sound for my band... i'm into the less distortion..more of an overdrive sound.. almost raunchy yet still clear
check out "clear" by maritime http://www.myspace.com/maritimesongs

also check out no one will remember just because that song kicks ass


again it depends on the music

I don't think it's what eck is looking for though. I've heard some of the stuff he's done.

Mine may not be "pro" either but it's probably closer to what we're talking about. At least what I've been talking about:D

 
What if just for shits/giggles I try a second mix ... only this time the way I would have mixed it if it were completely up to me?
.
Yeah that would be interesting to hear.

Cheers,
Eck
 
i don't know what "pro tone" is being saught after here... chessrock's guitar sound here is great i think.. if by pro tone you mean that top 40's over produced sound that you'd hear on the latestest nickelback album then count me out..
I don't think the Nickelback guitars would suit Chessrocks mix.
Chessrocks mix is a more grunge style I'd say.
I'm thinking Nirvana style guitar tone would suite the mix.

Eck
 
I don't think it's what eck is looking for though. I've heard some of the stuff he's done.

Mine may not be "pro" either but it's probably closer to what we're talking about. At least what I've been talking about:D

By closer yeah your guitar is heavier in style, but what I'm talking about in this thread isn't really about what style of heavy guitar, more so about just getting a smooth full disorted guitar pro sound.

I listened to your mix. Although I like the clean tone, real nice, the distorted tone is lost in clarity, is a bit lifeless and lacks power.
Sorry if you take offence, none meant, I'm just trying to leanr how to hear the differences between home recording distorted guitars and the pro guitars so I can learn how to record better. My disorted guitars are nothing to talk about!! :)

Cheers,
Eck
 
hrmm if that's the sound you're thinking then it's not at all what i was thinking you were after.. Nirvana's guitar sound is very raw.. less distortion more overdriven.. just for fun i'm listening to heart shape box right now and i have to say the distortion sound is anything but smooth, but that's why it works.. as i said think more overdrive then full blown distortion for this sound

get a big muff or mxr distortion pedal (i love my mxr pedal) you'll find the sound! hahah
 
By closer yeah your guitar is heavier in style, but what I'm talking about in this thread isn't really about what style of heavy guitar, more so about just getting a smooth full disorted guitar pro sound.

I listened to your mix. Although I like the clean tone, real nice, the distorted tone is lost in clarity, is a bit lifeless and lacks power.
Sorry if you take offence, none meant, I'm just trying to leanr how to hear the differences between home recording distorted guitars and the pro guitars so I can learn how to record better. My disorted guitars are nothing to talk about!! :)

Cheers,
Eck


No offence taken. I am a bit confused however. I don't understand the lack of clarity and power. This has tons more clarity than yours and it's pretty damn ass whomping powerful IMO. What is it that you would consider clear/smooth and powerful. An example maybe.
 
In the right hands, glorious tones can come out of one of those beasts. No doubt. But they're also very easy to mis-use.

.

I use a boogie. Presence knob stays @ 0. The gain knob however is a fine line between not enough gain to get some buzzsawing, and an over crowded tone. My gain knob is usually around the 5-6 position during rehersals. But in a recording session i usually go a hair lower, because tracking the rythm parts multiple times, makes it all up in the end. Lowering the gain will increase your tone definition rather than a higher gain setting that will over crowd and make a mess in a daw mix.

cheers, g
 
I use a boogie.


So you're not talking about a Rec then. The Boogies are a whole different animal. Frankly, for recording, they're just fantastic. I'm talking the smaller Boogie combo amps like the Nomad or similar. The rectal-fryers are fine for what they are, but difficult to get a great recorded tone out of sometimes, due to the amount of volume you're dealing with ... along with sort of a mud factor that can creep up if you're not really careful.

The smaller Boogie combo amps are just pure clear, powerful tone. At least from my experience, you can get a bigger sound out of them than you can out of much larger amps / cabinets, and they're much easier to deal with ... what comes out of them is generally what you get on the recording.

.
 
So you're not talking about a Rec then. The Boogies are a whole different animal. Frankly, for recording, they're just fantastic. I'm talking the smaller Boogie combo amps like the Nomad or similar. The rectal-fryers are fine for what they are, but difficult to get a great recorded tone out of sometimes, due to the amount of volume you're dealing with ... along with sort of a mud factor that can creep up if you're not really careful.

The smaller Boogie combo amps are just pure clear, powerful tone. At least from my experience, you can get a bigger sound out of them than you can out of much larger amps / cabinets, and they're much easier to deal with ... what comes out of them is generally what you get on the recording.

.


Ihave a two dc-5 heads and they sound
different. They are 50 watts. I usually use a 2 x12 cab and cover one speaker up. I much perfer it over a dual rec.

I've been looking to trade one of the heads for a 50 watt jcm 800 to get the best of both worlds. I like the chimmy'ness of a el34 marshall but the low end of a boogie.

Your track reminded me of the guitar tone of the Helmet album Meantime. I didn't think the actual material was good , but good guitar tone none the less.

cherrs
 
No offence taken. I am a bit confused however. I don't understand the lack of clarity and power. This has tons more clarity than yours and it's pretty damn ass whomping powerful IMO. What is it that you would consider clear/smooth and powerful. An example maybe.

As I said in my last post, my guitars are nothing to talk about.
Your guitar tone sounds very weak compared to what Im looking for in my recordings. If your happy with your guitar sound then thats good, but Im looking to achieve something alot more pro sounding.

Examples would be Deftones, Tool, A Perfect Circle ("Pet", from the album "Thirteenth step")

Listen to any of those then listen to your guitar, you will instantly hear the amount of power these examples have in their guitar.

Cheers,
Eck
 
Back
Top