knightfly
GrouchyOldFartOnBatteries
Michael - RE: soundproofing, and STC ratings - In case you've forgotten, check out the STC charts at John's site
http://www.saecollege.de/reference_material/index.html
- just remember, STC doesn't take into account anything in the bottom two octaves so won't predict results for trains, trucks, or incoming mortar rounds. (Or kick drum/bass getting out)
Pro studio builders use a really expensive recording sound level system for several weeks on a site before deciding how much sound control they need. I've only briefly considered doing something like that with a PC, a large hard drive, and a pgm like Samplitude that will let you do lower sample rates and record til the drive is full, then looking at the (time) compressed WAV file to find the peaks, and looking at the time code to find out when they happened - I think for most semi-pro use, that would probably be overkill and noisy periods could be worked around.
If I remember correctly, when you narrow the space between studs on any given wall plane to less than 2', the sound proofing gets worse. A certain amount of flex improves bass absorption... Steel studs generally are better than wood, because they flex in the middle and lessen the transmission from inner to outer wall surface, or vice versa. (Plus, no knots to nail into...)
As far as another wall inside, I'm still trying to fathom that one. On the studiotips.com site, there is a really bright acoustician named Eric that has designed major venues in europe, who continually cautions against "tripple leaf" walls as being detrimental to sound deadening. I'm eventually going to post a request for more clarification on that one, but as yet have not taken the time to even try to understand it first, much less post a "less than totally dumb-ass" question. Eric is from the Netherlands, and I have to work sometimes to follow his comments. (In all fairness, his English is about 500 orders of magnitude better than my Dutch...) He brings up things like % compression of rubber in order to actually achieve the isolation you think you're getting, how the figures for compression assume you're not "containing" the side walls of the rubber, which will stiffen it, etc, etc -
Just in case you weren't already buried in enough details... Steve
http://www.saecollege.de/reference_material/index.html
- just remember, STC doesn't take into account anything in the bottom two octaves so won't predict results for trains, trucks, or incoming mortar rounds. (Or kick drum/bass getting out)
Pro studio builders use a really expensive recording sound level system for several weeks on a site before deciding how much sound control they need. I've only briefly considered doing something like that with a PC, a large hard drive, and a pgm like Samplitude that will let you do lower sample rates and record til the drive is full, then looking at the (time) compressed WAV file to find the peaks, and looking at the time code to find out when they happened - I think for most semi-pro use, that would probably be overkill and noisy periods could be worked around.
If I remember correctly, when you narrow the space between studs on any given wall plane to less than 2', the sound proofing gets worse. A certain amount of flex improves bass absorption... Steel studs generally are better than wood, because they flex in the middle and lessen the transmission from inner to outer wall surface, or vice versa. (Plus, no knots to nail into...)
As far as another wall inside, I'm still trying to fathom that one. On the studiotips.com site, there is a really bright acoustician named Eric that has designed major venues in europe, who continually cautions against "tripple leaf" walls as being detrimental to sound deadening. I'm eventually going to post a request for more clarification on that one, but as yet have not taken the time to even try to understand it first, much less post a "less than totally dumb-ass" question. Eric is from the Netherlands, and I have to work sometimes to follow his comments. (In all fairness, his English is about 500 orders of magnitude better than my Dutch...) He brings up things like % compression of rubber in order to actually achieve the isolation you think you're getting, how the figures for compression assume you're not "containing" the side walls of the rubber, which will stiffen it, etc, etc -
Just in case you weren't already buried in enough details... Steve