CW9 Performance

  • Thread starter Thread starter EddieRay
  • Start date Start date
EddieRay

EddieRay

#?
I had a great weekend: tracked my drummer to 5 tracks of tape (TASCAM 688) alongside 2 scratch tracks, then dumped all 7 tracks into CW9, 2 songs, 3 takes each, 24-bit @ 48kHz. Nothing went wrong during this transfer.

I usually have a problem tracking 4 or more tracks at a time, 16-bit @ 44.1kHz. My PC (XP, 2.2 gHz, Celeron) usually finds something better to do when I'm doing audio stuff, causing little tempo gaps or having dropout fits. I tripled my memory (now 768mb) and got a bigger, faster hard drive but even so my PC is finicky about when it will perform well.

Not last weekend though. Smooth as silk from beginning to end. I noticed there wasn't much disk activity while dumping the tracks. Only when I stopped recording did the disk go into heavy write mode.

What gives? Is it good karma given to me by mistake? Or maybe 24-bit/48kHz performs better than 16-bit/44.1kHz? Somebody help me understand my good fortune so I can repeat it.
 
The best advice I can give you is UPGRADE! S3 can squeeze a hell of a lot more out of the relatively modern hardware you have than v9 is currently giving you.

Even so, it would be worthwhile digging through this site's search tips and tweaks for XP.

www.musicxp.net

What sound card are you using?

Q.
 
Qwerty said:
The best advice I can give you is UPGRADE! S3 can squeeze a hell of a lot more out of the relatively modern hardware you have than v9 is currently giving you.

Even so, it would be worthwhile digging through this site's search tips and tweaks for XP.

www.musicxp.net

What sound card are you using?

Q.

My soundcard is an Aardvark Aark24.

I've combed through this site looking for, and applying, performance tweaks. Last weekend was the real test so maybe it all paid off. But even after tweaking, just trying to convert a midi drum track to audio had to be done several times in order to get a non-glitchy track.

I would have thought that 24-bit @48kHz would really challenge my PC but it actually performed much better. Is that typical?
 
Back
Top