
lexdrummer
mix mono
That was lite hearted pluckery. I didn't mean anything by that.noisedude said:Why would anyone disagree with it? You're looking for something that isn't there, dude.
That was lite hearted pluckery. I didn't mean anything by that.noisedude said:Why would anyone disagree with it? You're looking for something that isn't there, dude.
Today I found out I definitely have to move out of my house and there is definitely nowhere I can move to ... having pissed off the major local letting agent by trying to move me and my four male friends into a 'family' house without them realising. My bad mood is not caused by microphone.lexdrummer said:That was lite hearted pluckery. I didn't mean anything by that.
dude that is hard luck man. sorry to hear it.noisedude said:Today I found out I definitely have to move out of my house and there is definitely nowhere I can move to ... having pissed off the major local letting agent by trying to move me and my four male friends into a 'family' house without them realising. My bad mood is not caused by microphone.![]()
Great point noiseman. For dense or "big" soundmixes there is not substitue for good mic's, pres and converters. Not to mention a good variety thereof for the most part. Helping the tool closet give individualized clarity taylored exactly to the specific source is just plain art, skill and money combined.noisedude said:Dude, maybe you don't realise you're a bit of a special case. Most people here could NEVER make music as good as yours, regardless of equipment. That doesn't mean that if you had better mics it wouldn't sound better - it just means that you're doing something special with what you have.
Plus, for the most part, you are exploiting the limits of home recording and going for a quite compact, quirky and intelligent sound. People who are trying to sound like the huge bands like Rage, U2 or anyone else who has a 'big' sound are struggling to do so and resort to better gear to try and get there.
Cheers Ryan ... in all seriousness I'm thinking about upping sticks to another country in 12 months' time to do some teacher training in a change of scene. This old town, as they say, is getting me down.cellardweller said:damn noisy, you're definitely having a day.
Ehh, these things usually work themselves out...
besides, what's the worst that can happen?
besides becoming a street-person![]()
The spirit of adventure is a wonderful thing...keep the faith noisedude.noisedude said:Cheers Ryan ... in all seriousness I'm thinking about upping sticks to another country in 12 months' time to do some teacher training in a change of scene. This old town, as they say, is getting me down.
You surely know it CAT. I downloaded all your stuff. I feel like I ripped it off it's so good. Tell the "offensive" team they need an SM57POWER T-shirt...cat-eggs said:the sm57 sounds fine to me. i like it better than crappier ldc's i've heard.
whenever i heard mp3s off this web page, the sm57 usually asserted people as modest homerecorders who're getting the job done, while these crappy ldcs assert people as home recorders who are trying to sound great and not getting the job done
Perhaps I'll be seein' ya in the United States of Amerikanoisedude said:Cheers Ryan ... in all seriousness I'm thinking about upping sticks to another country in 12 months' time to do some teacher training in a change of scene. This old town, as they say, is getting me down.
That's totally besides the point. I blieve there are artists that can make a create recording with a handheld 4-track - I've been part of such sessionslexdrummer said:I believe you have a point, but the other is about expression and creativity. One artist that does this quite well (if within your taste) is an artist whom has 5 CDs after multiple sold out pressings of five hundred on LP, all recorded with odd mics, usually an SM57. All of this done on a tascam 4track. He took California to a new age of psychedelic circle and now travels the world on the dragcity label. This artist is renouned for his "soul" on record, and has clipped multiple record label deals out of an sm57 and a tascam 4track. Let me know if you want his name. Better yet, see if anyone out there knows who I'm talking about. Quiz time. His name is everywhere on the net.
I think you are taking some of this out of context. That was merely a display of hope for the little guy who has limited equipment and limited means to acquire more. It was inspiration from the fortitude of those who never gave up, and offered what they had and could do at the time to measured success. As well as, getting the best possible sound from what you have may be the key to your tone, which in effect is the "relative merits of YOUR gear" possibly containing that "best sound you can get".fraserhutch said:That's totally besides the point. I blieve there are artists that can make a create recording with a handheld 4-track - I've been part of such sessions
However, this is a forum where we discuss the relative merits of gear and how to get the best sound we can get. Why is that soooo hard to comprehend?????
fraserhutch said:That's totally besides the point. I blieve there are artists that can make a create recording with a handheld 4-track - I've been part of such sessions
However, this is a forum where we discuss the relative merits of gear and how to get the best sound we can get. Why is that soooo hard to comprehend?????
Absolutely! What I'm saying is that the technique is a part of it, a large part, but not all.PhilGood said:Isn't part of the art getting the best sound you can with the gear you've got? We're not just about telling people which gear to go out and buy! There's technique involved here! That's a great deal about what this forum is about! If I buy a u47 and am getting poor results, is this forum only here to tell me what else to get?
Where did I tell anyone what they cannot talk about? I am ONLY stating that it is equally valid to sdiscuss the merits of gear.And who are you to tell us what we should talk about?!
Dude. I already took a red star from all this tension. Lets not bicker and argue over...who killed who. This is supposed to be a happy occassion.....through the tragic death of this posting, I don't think I have so much as lost a thred, as gained some insight...fraserhutch said:Absolutely! What I'm saying is that the technique is a part of it, a large part, but not all.
A large part of what we do around here is discuss the relative merits of gear.
Where did I tell anyone what they cannot talk about? I am ONLY stating that it is equally valid to sdiscuss the merits of gear.
Kapeesh?
fraserhutch said:Where did I tell anyone what they cannot talk about? I am ONLY stating that it is equally valid to sdiscuss the merits of gear.
Kapeesh?
fraserhutch said:Why is that soooo hard to comprehend?????
I think he's run away.......KEEP RUNNING!PhilGood said:You did. By the statement:
You implied that someone doesn't understand what to ask or post, like they didn't get it. Its a pretty condescending statement, isn't it?