
Shout It Out
New member
xstatic said:Look for a used Soundcraft 6000, Amek Big, D&R Orion, Trident Series 65, 75, or 24 etc....
what he said
xstatic said:Look for a used Soundcraft 6000, Amek Big, D&R Orion, Trident Series 65, 75, or 24 etc....
xstatic said:In every instance I can think of, the boards I talked about above will far surpass the mackie. Even with cheap mics and a bad room.
In other words, you can't really prove it. It's a matter of opinion and talent. If a person knows how to use a certain board to its full potential, it can sound as good as a board twice its cost.xstatic said:I don't. I also don't ever use stuff like that as a reference. I much prefer getting advice from people I trust. Equipment is too different and too tempermental for tests like that to be very useful.
katierich said:In other words, you can't really prove it. It's a matter of opinion and talent. If a person knows how to use a certain board to its full potential, it can sound as good as a board twice its cost.
She wanted some posts, so I went under her thing for a bit. Shhh...mshilarious said:Using your woman as a hatchet chick? Nice![]()
katierich said:In other words, you can't really prove it. It's a matter of opinion and talent. If a person knows how to use a certain board to its full potential, it can sound as good as a board twice its cost.
xstatic said:Lets maybe try to be a little less narrow minded here. Does a $1000 and a $2000 board sound much different? Not really, in general. Features is usually what you will find at this price range. However. I was talking about consoles that started their lives in the $10000 and up range. So now we are talking about consoles that cost 5 to 20 times as much. Having used many of these consoles, including Mackie's, here is what I have come to realize. Your statement is absolutely false. If a person knows how to use a certain board to its full potential, it can sound as good as a board twice its cost WHEN someone else with less potential is using the other board. However, if those same people were to use better stuff, there product would almost always be better as well. Telling someone to stay with a Mackie instead of buying a piece of equipment that sounds much better, has more appeal, and has more features is kind of irresponsible to me. Especially if you want to pretend that sonically they are virtually equals. Now, reccomending that someone do this based on budget, intended use and other qualifying factors is a completely different story.
In the end, I stand by my statement. My statement comes from my own experience, my own trials, and my own opinions. There is no scientific way of testing those things.
LemonTree said:Cornwall is ALLEN & HEATH country! I'd be keeping my eyes n ears open for an old SABER PLUS
Now THAT is funny as hell!!![]()
Yes, I have. But when reading what I'm saying, keep in mind the name of the thread. "Budget" recording mixer. As in.. BUDGET! The best bang for your buck is a Mackie, especially if you know the strengths of the board and how to stay away from its weaknesses.xstatic said:First off, not true. Anyone who does not know what they are doing can screw up an album on an EMI TG console. Secondly, as far as I was concerned, my responses were within the reality of this specific thread. What wasn't is insinuating that a mackie will do the same as the nicer consoles. Have you ever used a good desk?