Behringer is a God-send . . .
When I think of companies in the pro audio industry who have revolutionized the playing field by offering superior bang-for-buck performers, a few companies come to mind . . .
Joemeek, for one. Mackie. M-audio. Studio Projects. FMR-audio.
Behringer, however, tops my list hands-down.
When Harvey said that Behringer "may have taken" the lead in bang-for-buck mics, I considered that quite the understatement.
The C1 is a great mic for the price at $230. Yet, for $30 less, you can get Behringer's B2. The B2 has a bass rolloff, an extra diaphragm, a -10db pad, and it's multi-directional. Having the choice of pickup patterns is like getting an extra microphone. Basically, it is an exact replica of
the Rode NT-2. As much as I like the C1, I think it would be awfully tough to pass up what is essentially an NT2 for $30 less.
Need I even mention the value you get with
the ECM-8000, which is similar to the Earthworks models, and sounds remarkably good for a measley $35?
And now, I hear they are coming out with the B1, which should be an even cheaper single-diaphragm version of the B2. If that sells within the $100 range like I'm guessing, then there's your leader in bang-for-buck mics.
Then there's the composer, which is basically a ripoff of the Drawmer compressors. These things go for like $80! If the reverse-engineering brings these anywhere close to the quality of the Drawmer units, then how can you even justify buying an RNC?!! Yes, the RNC is: a) twice the price, b) doesn't have a limiter and c) doesn't have a gate. Shit, the gate and limiter alone should be at least worth the $80, even if the compressor sucks! And I've heard they're quite good!
Add to the list their cheap D.I. boxes, patch-bays, etc., and the cheapskate home recorder should be bowing down and kissing the feet of the mighty B.
But no, someone bought a B mixer, and it sucked. Boo-hoo. Just buy a Mackie and get over it.