The admin was mentioned - oddly, there's nowhere I can find that says who the forum belongs to, or how to contact the admin or owners. The reason for this comment is that one section of the rules mentions membership minimum age - 13! Legally speaking, accepting 13 year old members (but not 12) does mean that moderation is actually a requirement - under the duty of care rules that are common to many jurisdictions. Exposing a 13 yr old to some of our content, especially PT places. I'm by no means a legal expert, but if the forum is uncontrolled for many hours a day, then the people in charge, and owners could end up in court? Society is going mad because of 'education' topics delivered to kids in schools, but is the content of prime time suitable for kids? Of course members can lie about age to get in on some adult forums, but inviting 13 year olds in is great - but then the content ALL needs to be suitable for 13 year olds. Gecko, as the only mod, would be first contact. He would have the unenviable job of justifying ALL content as the man with the keys. This is pretty unfair - I guess complaints go to Nico first, then Gecko. I always use what I call the Judge Judy test for loads of things. What would she say if you stood before her. "You invited in this 13 yr old kids and then exposed them to ........? You're an idiot Sir" Anyone who has seen that show would know how it would go. "What did you do about it? You had a strong word with them?"