H
Harvey Gerst
New member
It's a question that gets repeated here just about every week - and there's no simple answer. Here's why it's a problem to try and answer this question:
The guitar is considered a large source, with notes radiating from all parts of the face of the guitar. That means that no matter where you point the mic, some of the notes will be coming in "off-axis" (coming into the sides of the mic).
Now, small diaphragm condenser mics have better off-axis response. The smaller bodies don't cause reflections or block some of the frequencies (like large diaphragm mics can,) so they're generally used for capturing large sources, like guitars, pipe organs, choirs, etc.
Large diaphragm condenser mics are generally used for smaller sources, because they have more "personality," and can be used to flatter a particular voice, or small instrument. Since a voice is a pretty small source, off-axis response is less of a problem when using a large diaphragm condenser mic to capture the sound.
There are exceptions to these statements, but they're usually very expensive exceptions. Neumann U-87's have often been used to record large instruments, but at $3K each, they might be out of range for most home recordists.
For most of us here, the best solution (i.e., cheapest way to go) might be to get a nice, inexpensive large diaphragm condenser mic, suitable for vocals - and a small diaphragm mic or two for guitars.
One mic to record both voice and guitar well isn't really a great option. For a particular voice and a particular guitar, you may get lucky, but nobody here can help you, except to point out what may have worked for them. Will their mic choice work for you as well?
Maybe, but I wouldn't count on it.
Naiant, MXL, Behringer, Studio Projects, and several other companies, make very affordable large and small diaphragm condenser mics.
The guitar is considered a large source, with notes radiating from all parts of the face of the guitar. That means that no matter where you point the mic, some of the notes will be coming in "off-axis" (coming into the sides of the mic).
Now, small diaphragm condenser mics have better off-axis response. The smaller bodies don't cause reflections or block some of the frequencies (like large diaphragm mics can,) so they're generally used for capturing large sources, like guitars, pipe organs, choirs, etc.
Large diaphragm condenser mics are generally used for smaller sources, because they have more "personality," and can be used to flatter a particular voice, or small instrument. Since a voice is a pretty small source, off-axis response is less of a problem when using a large diaphragm condenser mic to capture the sound.
There are exceptions to these statements, but they're usually very expensive exceptions. Neumann U-87's have often been used to record large instruments, but at $3K each, they might be out of range for most home recordists.
For most of us here, the best solution (i.e., cheapest way to go) might be to get a nice, inexpensive large diaphragm condenser mic, suitable for vocals - and a small diaphragm mic or two for guitars.
One mic to record both voice and guitar well isn't really a great option. For a particular voice and a particular guitar, you may get lucky, but nobody here can help you, except to point out what may have worked for them. Will their mic choice work for you as well?
Maybe, but I wouldn't count on it.
Naiant, MXL, Behringer, Studio Projects, and several other companies, make very affordable large and small diaphragm condenser mics.