AD conversion for DAT

  • Thread starter Thread starter macros4
  • Start date Start date
M

macros4

New member
For a portable classical-recording rig i intend to use DAT with external converters and preamps; since DAT is 16bit, how can i interface the converters that currently are on the market - my eyes are set on the 20bit Lucid AD/DA

If i run the S/PDIF out of the Lucid into a DAT machine (perhaps an ebay'ed Tascam DA30?) S/PDIF in, will it merely cut the last 4 bits off the signal? If so, will this make it sound awful? (are these good choices for gear?) Thank you in advance for your input
 
The Sony DATs have excellent converters. Hell some studios use their DATs for the converters alone.
 
Track: i can't find anything in the online manual or specs that discusses bit-depth options; only 20 is listed. Are there any comparable converters at lesser prices than the Apogee that still does 16-bit? is there an inexpensive converter that dithers well? thanks
 
macros4 said:
as good as the Lucids? impressive... but is this so on the less expensive models as well? the PCMR300, for instance?
Click to expand...
I really don't know how they stack up against the Lucid converters. I really doubt Sony would use any other converters for the DATs, it would not be cheaper for them once they're using one type in production. I really don't have all the details on the Sony converter story, try a Google search.

The Mini-Me has variable requencies and bit rates.

www.apogeedigital.com/products/prod_minime.html
 
I have used the MiniMe for classical recording and it did a creditable job. I was using it at 24bits, though (into a Masterlink). The converters in it are better than the ones in any DAT I've used, even at 16bits, and the mic pres are quite nice (in a Grace or Earthworks, uncolored way). The built-in limitng and compression can be a real life saver, particularly when recording live where unexpected peaks can pop up (and you don't want to set levels too low at 16bits).

Scott
 
I like the idea of the mini-me but don't have that kind of budget at this point. Digit - u bring up an interesting point: the Masterlink; how are the ADCs on the Alesis? Good enough to wait before getting something on par with the Mini?
 
Yeah, the Masterlink converters aren't bad, and you can record at 24bits, and/or higher sample rates. I wouldn't rely too much on the built-in signal processing (not that its bad, I just have better) but the editing functions are great. A pair of good mics, 2 channels of clean preamps & a Masterlink = a good live to stereo recording rig.

Scott
 
At our studio, we use the Lucid AD9624 into the Tascam DA-30 MkII and it's superior to the sound of the Tascam converters, IMO. Is it a huge difference? Not really, but it's definitely an improvement.
 
thanks all for ur advice - i think i'll probably go for the alesis: its the best bang for the buck at this point.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top