G
Greg_L
Banned
lol @ craft
OK, Good at Sports, I'm not a song writing expert, but it sound well structured, story line moves in a typical direction, it is rather predictable, a couple of good clever lines, (trade in my GPA), etc.
But now, I ask, even with a well crafted song, and I'm not talking about the songs intention, what's the purpose of the song to you?
I want to craft a well written song, but I will forgo typical structure to achieve more thought out of the listener. Tease at words, use words where the listener has to think about what I am saying.
Good at Sports was pretty straight forward and there was little to no teasing or challenge to the listener. Not a bad song by any stretch of the imagination, but where does it raise above all the other good songs?
You could take the same song, use a bunch of double entendres to make the song sound innocent, but raunchy at the same time. If this is what you did, I missed it and now show my ignorance.![]()
Your missing alot of what the song has in it. For one it gets you involved in the story right away, first line is action, no fluff to fill space, no wasted words. You can see the whole story without seeing a video, thats old school writing.
As a listener, I did not get pulled into the story. To get one involved into the story, you have to draw me there. I wasn't drawn. As a listener, there was nothing there that even asked me to come back again. I heard the story, said hey nice, but didn't feel drawn back to it.
Some of my other comments were more examples, not saying that is how to do it. Some of the best story songs I know, American Pie, My Daddy's Hat (Chet Atkins sings it, not sure of the writer), Taxi (Harry Chapin), Fast Car (Tracey Chapman) just to name a few. It always draws you back, even when you are sure of the outcome.
Well, for Fast Car, I got it. And yes, American Pie is too high a bar. Fair enough.
The lyrics you have The Future is Rosie, of course they are good, but kind of been done before, like many times before. As for the other meaning, you're too clever for me to follow on that one. Reads like, poor schmuck, looser, meets the girl of his dream, soforth and so on. I get it.
Now, here is my point, in the right music setting, these words can be pulled out of the doldrums onto something bigger than the words. To me, that is why song writing takes on the second part, where does it sit (inside the notes/instruments). Am I a trailer in a trailer park, or am I a trailer on a lake? Now, that is the difference.
Interesting.
lol Im a better singer and music writer than I am a lyric writer, I had to work hard to get decent at lyrics.
Im pretty sure if this was recorded full blast, you'd appreciate it more.
https://soundcloud.com/dm60/the-loss
Where are the lyrics? so far i hear the riff from pink floyds "wish you were here" This has been done so many times
too many to count!
And all i hear for a lyric is and "I lost you" you should use a different line than that, and not repeat it a hundred times. It sound slike it might work for an ending, but not throughout the whole song.
You got some soul, but your songs are really raw, you can tighten them up considerably
Barry, you need to start your own "Sticky" thread - "Critical Listening and Crafty Composition". Break it down, tell us how it's done.
I didn't listen, I thing there is a problem with your link...
Well, you said it as well, nothing new under the sun. And it goes, "I found", "I lost", "I will find". I never claimed to be a great song writer. I think it is very hard. I'm just writing. That song is actually more about the death of a life long partner. But yes, I know it is not new. My focus was just to record and write. Not much more really.
I want to say thanks for the Pink Floyd reference. I've never learned a PF song, and to be able to play anything close to them I take as a compliment. I like to think it is a little more folksy than PF, but hey I'll take the complement anyway I can get it.![]()
The only thing that really sounds different is the production techniques, and the personal antics.