TeyshaBlue
It's the smell..
I'm asking you. Am I lying?
I'm asking you. Am I lying?
Victory Pete
Banned
Zaphod B
Raccoons-Be-Gone, Inc.
That's why I don't light any matches around her. I'm afraid I might create a singularity.
TeyshaBlue
It's the smell..
You're right in the middle of a learning situation. Soak it up.
Zaphod B
Raccoons-Be-Gone, Inc.
Talk less, listen more.
muttley600
Banned
Guy's the only person VP is lying to here is himself and he is also the only one likely to suffer as a result.
As long as the regular members keep pointing out his false assertions others will not be harmed or harm their instruments or knowledge as a result. If VP can't accept sound reason or scientific evidence as valid there is little we can do to change that.
Here is an actual picture of an actual vibrating string by the way and I see no "dead spots" theoretical or otherwise other than the node at the ratio 2:1 which we would expect to see. My opinion just imagined it into being.
As long as the regular members keep pointing out his false assertions others will not be harmed or harm their instruments or knowledge as a result. If VP can't accept sound reason or scientific evidence as valid there is little we can do to change that.
Here is an actual picture of an actual vibrating string by the way and I see no "dead spots" theoretical or otherwise other than the node at the ratio 2:1 which we would expect to see. My opinion just imagined it into being.
Attachments
TeyshaBlue
It's the smell..
Be very wary of walking behind Beagles.
Lt. Bob
Spread the Daf!
yep ...... no possibility whatsoever. Vibration theory dictates that the vibration begins at the very point of contact where the string is free to vibrate. Obviously it can't vibrate very much right there ..... but vibrate it does.
Victory Pete
Banned
Zaphod B
Raccoons-Be-Gone, Inc.
Obviously photoshopped!Here is an actual picture of an actual vibrating string by the way and I see no "dead spots" theoretical or otherwise other than the node at the ratio 2:1 which we would expect to see. My opinion just imagined it into being.
TeyshaBlue
It's the smell..
Nice try. I'll ask you again. Am I lying?
muttley600
Banned
Actually its "bugle" farts obviously you didn't get the handouts that day.
TeyshaBlue
It's the smell..
I'm going to lunch now. Take some time to try to extricate yourself from the chinese finger trap of logic you've become stuck in.
Victory Pete
Banned
Guy's the only person VP is lying to here is himself and he is also the only one likely to suffer as a result.
As long as the regular members keep pointing out his false assertions others will not be harmed or harm their instruments or knowledge as a result. If VP can't accept sound reason or scientific evidence as valid there is little we can do to change that.
Here is an actual picture of an actual vibrating string by the way and I see no "dead spots" theoretical or otherwise other than the node at the ratio 2:1 which we would expect to see. My opinion just imagined it into being.
First of all, A guitar string never has that amplitude. Second the deadspot would be very close to the saddle, is there even a saddle there or is it just tied on. Yes I understand harmonics and nodes.
muttley600
Banned
It's been fun guys. I'm back to work now. Catch you later.
Keep it real for me.
Keep it real for me.
Zaphod B
Raccoons-Be-Gone, Inc.
Maybe you should use a spell checker on those handouts!
Victory Pete
Banned
What if it is not neccassarily a string but something stiffer like a small diameter rod?
Zaphod B
Raccoons-Be-Gone, Inc.
Later, y'all!
muttley600
Banned
Prove it.
A vibrating string is a vibrating string or are you going to suggest it vibrates freely without fixed points at each end?
Prove it.
muttley600
Banned
Physics would describe that as a fixed beam but seeing as how you are so fond of physics you would know that wouldn't you.
Later guys. For a few virtual beers in about three hours from now.