The Purpose of the List of Bad Tapes Thread

[Dr ZEE]

Without references, you are dead in the water.

Reference is not a proving point nor a point to score.
Reference is an obligation when and where it is due.
**********
Question of the day:
"What is Das Referat ?"

 

[MCI2424]

Oh, Who did you talk to? Please let me know.

OGI is a research institute not a teaching institute. All scientific knowledge is based on the works of others. We cite those references in our papers. Each and every person who is granted a degree from OGI must do some original research. Their findings are the basis on their research. It must be significant and original.

Buts lets go back to who you talked to here. Please tell me their name.

Uhh................where have I gone wrong?

READ DR>ZEES POST and then READ MY ANSWER


I SAID THAT YOU HAVE TO PROVIDE REFERENCES FOR YOUR FINDINGS.

Please read s...l...o...w...l...y so you can get it.

IE> You can"t say that RMG tape is better than Quantagy because I think it sounds better. You have to prove it sounds better with references to how it is made, what material (better/worse) it is made from and why it is better.

Subjectivity aside in the "sound" there must be scientific reason (s) why it would "sound" better.

 

[MCI2424]

always do.

I'm glad that you do

The only reason I respond to MCI2424 posts on this board IS - fulfilling my duty helping to keep this board being a credible resource for people who are in search for information about actual findings.

There is always a purpose, you see..

Name for me 1 uncredible thing you think I said.

1 example please.

It is time for you to close your mouth and prove, by way of reference, why you are just plain attacking me and my experience, credibility etc.

 

[evm1024]

Come on Andy, answer the question!

Reference is not a proving point nor a point to score.
Reference is an obligation when and where it is due.
**********
Question of the day:
"What is Das Referat ?"

Oh, Who did you talk to? Please let me know.

OGI is a research institute not a teaching institute. All scientific knowledge is based on the works of others. We cite those references in our papers. Each and every person who is granted a degree from OGI must do some original research. Their findings are the basis of their research. It must be significant and original.

But lets go back to who you talked to here at OGI. Please tell me their name.

No. Findings are using resources to back up what you are trying to prove. No college will ever grant a degree based on "original research". You are clueless.
Without references, you are dead in the water. Wanta challengeme?

Go ahead. I have many friends at MIT that will blow your ascertions into the water.

You have to base your research on materials with references to previous research to be credible. Unless your college bases its degrees upon BS resources, it has not changed.

EDIT: I talked to your Oregon Graduate Institite and they grant degrees based on the research/reference method.

Andy, come on. Tell me who you talked to at OGI. I'll be happy to walk over to their office and ask them what you talked about.

Just answer this one question. Who at OGI did you talk to?

 

[MCI2424]

Andy, come on. Tell me who you talked to at OGI. I'll be happy to walk over to their office and ask them what you talked about.

Just answer this one question. Who at OGI did you talk to?

See. Bait taken. You have absolutely no problem with my changing the subject if you can harass.

Try answering another question, Where excatly have I given misleading information over and over again?


You just seem to be following the heroes here. They have given not one shred of proof as to their ascertions. Any "proof" they have provided was totally taken out of context. What kind of degree have you been given? I hope they are teaching you to think for yourself. Not trying to put you down at all, but you are calling me on everything and them on nothing.

I think I will bypass OGI if that is the scientific method they choose to teach.

Peace be with you.

 

[evm1024]

Ah Andy

See. Bait taken. You have absolutely no problem with my changing the subject if you can harass.

Try answering another question, Where excatly have I given misleading information over and over again?


You just seem to be following the heroes here. They have given not one shred of proof as to their ascertions. Any "proof" they have provided was totally taken out of context. What kind of degree have you been given? I hope they are teaching you to think for yourself. Not trying to put you down at all, but you are calling me on everything and them on nothing.

I think I will bypass OGI if that is the scientific method they choose to teach.

Peace be with you.

Andy, You lied about it. You lied about talking to someone at OGI. You got caught.

You know we are about the same age. You're about 50 and should know better.