studioviols
New member
Scenario :
An MP3 Clinic board member contacts you through email or PM and tells you that there is an MP3 , (at 160kbps), available for you to download ... and that they would like for you to develop a part, and record that part ... to their song.
They tell you that they had 'you in mind' ,when they actually were writing the song.
You ask them about a time frame ... they say ... oh ... no timeframe.
So you work the collab into your schedule, and you get an email 4 days later asking how the tracks are going. You respond that you are going to start on them at the top of the week in a few days.
So you've downloaded, and then you spend some long hours laying some tracks, mixing, mastering and then finally uploading your side of the collaboration. And you slave over these tracks, you do the damn best you can do, for the board, and for the collaboration, but most importantly ... for the song itself.
You check the ideas with others through your additional resources, and they are stunned, the tracks are fantastic and totally appropriate they say. They can't wait to hear how the collaboration progresses, and several say they would love a crack at a lead line or whatever, they want a piece of that action they say.
You upload your first set of ideas, the foundation for your part, and solicit another chat session to discuss the collab and where it should go. This is a very formal collab it seems, exactly the opposite of what The Ghost of FM and I are recently involved in.
So you have a chat with your collaborator and they tell you 'it sounds like samples !' , you become concerned ...
The next response you get is notification that your partner has posted a mix to their nowhereradio.com site that has the same name as the song you and your collaborator the songwriter have been working on together.
Oh joy you think in naive confusion, I'm posted for this collab, so you download to see what your fellow collaborator finally did with your mix.
On their nowhereradio.com website you find a mix posted with the disclaimer that the tune is finished and there is a byline with your name thanking you and giving you credit for 'tips' . You become concerened
You listen. Your collaboration partner has indeed posted a mix ... of them playing the instrument you were solicited to collaborate. The are playing YOUR arrangement with some additions that are highly inappropriate ... and their playing sucks like holy shit especially when compared to the general quality of the song and the performance and the recording ... and you have been given credit for the 'tips'.
Too late, someone who 'wanted a piece of the action' has downloaded it also, one of your peers who helped you check out the mix ... they say you've been suckered, you have lost credibility with a professional peer, they will of course tell everyone else and they have the mix also to prove it.
They make a joke of it.
Again, your collaborator has basically taken your arrangement and altered it to fit their perceptions, made some additions ... and proudly posted it as finished ... blaming you for their shitty mess with the 'thanks for the tips' and 'it's finished' disclaimer.
What do you do ? How does this affect the spirit of collaboration on the board ? How does this affect the health of the board.
How important is collaboration for this board? Officially, there isn't even a collaboration section here ...
Is collaboration greatly subordinate to reviewing mixes on this Clinic ?
Or is collaboration the majik that holds this whole ship together, born from the juice the Clinic's fruits have produced ?
Your thoughts please fellow board member so we can nip this in the bud, if there be nipping to do ?
An MP3 Clinic board member contacts you through email or PM and tells you that there is an MP3 , (at 160kbps), available for you to download ... and that they would like for you to develop a part, and record that part ... to their song.
They tell you that they had 'you in mind' ,when they actually were writing the song.
You ask them about a time frame ... they say ... oh ... no timeframe.
So you work the collab into your schedule, and you get an email 4 days later asking how the tracks are going. You respond that you are going to start on them at the top of the week in a few days.
So you've downloaded, and then you spend some long hours laying some tracks, mixing, mastering and then finally uploading your side of the collaboration. And you slave over these tracks, you do the damn best you can do, for the board, and for the collaboration, but most importantly ... for the song itself.
You check the ideas with others through your additional resources, and they are stunned, the tracks are fantastic and totally appropriate they say. They can't wait to hear how the collaboration progresses, and several say they would love a crack at a lead line or whatever, they want a piece of that action they say.
You upload your first set of ideas, the foundation for your part, and solicit another chat session to discuss the collab and where it should go. This is a very formal collab it seems, exactly the opposite of what The Ghost of FM and I are recently involved in.
So you have a chat with your collaborator and they tell you 'it sounds like samples !' , you become concerned ...
The next response you get is notification that your partner has posted a mix to their nowhereradio.com site that has the same name as the song you and your collaborator the songwriter have been working on together.
Oh joy you think in naive confusion, I'm posted for this collab, so you download to see what your fellow collaborator finally did with your mix.
On their nowhereradio.com website you find a mix posted with the disclaimer that the tune is finished and there is a byline with your name thanking you and giving you credit for 'tips' . You become concerened
You listen. Your collaboration partner has indeed posted a mix ... of them playing the instrument you were solicited to collaborate. The are playing YOUR arrangement with some additions that are highly inappropriate ... and their playing sucks like holy shit especially when compared to the general quality of the song and the performance and the recording ... and you have been given credit for the 'tips'.
Too late, someone who 'wanted a piece of the action' has downloaded it also, one of your peers who helped you check out the mix ... they say you've been suckered, you have lost credibility with a professional peer, they will of course tell everyone else and they have the mix also to prove it.
They make a joke of it.
Again, your collaborator has basically taken your arrangement and altered it to fit their perceptions, made some additions ... and proudly posted it as finished ... blaming you for their shitty mess with the 'thanks for the tips' and 'it's finished' disclaimer.
What do you do ? How does this affect the spirit of collaboration on the board ? How does this affect the health of the board.
How important is collaboration for this board? Officially, there isn't even a collaboration section here ...
Is collaboration greatly subordinate to reviewing mixes on this Clinic ?
Or is collaboration the majik that holds this whole ship together, born from the juice the Clinic's fruits have produced ?
Your thoughts please fellow board member so we can nip this in the bud, if there be nipping to do ?