D
drbluezz
New member
...Rode NT-3 or Shure SM-81? Thank you for your comments.
Tom
Tom
Can't beat a Godin Multiac for great amplified acoustic sound!
A few more parameters would be nice. SM-81 can solve a few live / stage issues (polar pattern / off axis rejection). But it has a relatively low SPL limit which could be equally problematic. Not to mention that your comparison is a different class of microphone. Do I power my laptop with a single 9V, or a car battery? Not quite the same thing, although both are mildly related.
OP, the SM81 has been used by approximately 10 billion professional live sound engineers on acoustic guitar (and drum overheads, which are way way louder) for the last 30+ years. It will work fine. The Rode is a newer mic; it will also work fine. A competent engineer could make either mic sound great for live sound or recording. That said, every FOH engineer knows the SM81, so if you are worried about making semi-competent engineers feel within their comfort zone, you might select that one.
Most of what you post about microphones is completely insane. SM81 has an SPL limit too low for live acoustic guitar? Exactly how does one play ac gtr at 136dBSPL (146dBSPL with the pad)?
SM81 specs at 125dB. About all the pad does is raise the noise floor.
(or at least mine did)
(I was able to make them clip on an unamplified trombone)
I guess I shouldn't post while drinking. For acoustic guitar it should be fine. For amplified acoustic guiter (thread title), implying guitar cabinet / pa / speaker system, that limit would be easy to crest with proximity. But alas, I miss understood the OP. Mainly because micing and amplifying are two different things. Sorry I misunderstood the OP (and was drunk). There are situations where that limit could easily be crested, but it depends on the ensemble. Large jazz band on a small stage with acoustic guitar? vs. Micing an UNamplified SOLO acoustic guitar.

The SM81 is a fine mic. In a studio and controlled situation, you really can't beat it for the money. BUT.... For live performances, if you take that mic outside (the first thing that comes to my mind when one mentions blue grass), and throw in other factors like riding on a moving parade float. That mic can be one of the most hideous things ever contrived by man. Very sensitive to handling noise (bumps in the road), very sensitive to wind noise. For live you're probably looking at more of a compromise than the best possible for this instrument in a known situation.
VERY good points. We will be playing outdoors and possibly on some low quality, noisy, stages...like flat bed trucks? Perhaps the SM-81 would be overkill or almost too good? Perhaps I should take a second look at an AKG perception 170??? I seem to be going in circles, LOL!
Tom
Outside? Low quality, noisy stages? I'd consider an SM-57 with a foam windscreen. Shure makes a foam windscreen that clips on the SM-57. Mine work just fine for that application.
http://www.amazon.com/Shure-A2WS-Foam-Windscreen-SM57/dp/B000Z08U7U
Not as hifi as a condenser, but you really don't want all that stage noise to be rendered in hifi either.
The fault for any misunderstanding was likely mine. What I meant by my post was, more specifically, what would be some of the best mics within the price range stated ($250-$350) to mic a live performance (non-electrified) acoustic guitar in an all acoustic bluegrass band? This is given the guitar player has his own instrument and vocal mic. There...have at it!![]()
Most of what you post about microphones is completely insane. SM81 has an SPL limit too low for live acoustic guitar? Exactly how does one play ac gtr at 136dBSPL (146dBSPL with the pad)? Do you put dynamite in your acoustic guitars?