You two sit in the corner. Sheesh.

(Just kidding...)
Cratinus & co., thanks for the detailed info!
I'm looking closely at the AW16G and I'm running these same questions through my owm mind. The big stumbling block for me is 16 bit recording and 44.1K sampling limitations. A thousand bucks is about the maximum I can spend, and I have n-track set up on the computer anyway. It seems that the closest competitor pricewise is a Fostex, and I suspect the Yamaha will be quieter with better preamps, and certainly better EQ.
So - My Question One:
Is it safe for me to assume that I can lay down tracks on the AW16G, archive them to the CD, pop them into the computer and fetch them with n-track? That gives me all kinds of tweaking options and still gives me a remote unit I can take into the field (last weekend it was 8 channels on a stage with 5 different acts doing a live show - might have come in handy if I knew how to use it).
Question Two:
Using this box in the field, is there any way I can move signal to the AW16G first, before it hits the mixing board? My mixer is a Mackie CFX - great in the field, a little noisy to use for recording. Can I run signal through the AW16G and then into the board, or will I need to build a patch bay to do it?
Thanks, y'all...
-------------
P.S. The mixer has four sub outs and an insert on each channel. I'd like to avoid any of it to get signal directly to the recorder first, but an option might be for me to use the send of each insert as an unbalanced input on the recorder. I have phantom power on the board, and can use at least one or two external preamps to get a better sound, but I'm left with the Mackie preamps for the rest. They're pretty good, but probably not as good as the Yamaha's.