V57M Reviews

  • Thread starter Thread starter BlindCowboy
  • Start date Start date

Mic any good?

  • Damn nice!

    Votes: 5 71.4%
  • So, So

    Votes: 2 28.6%
  • I miss the $40.00

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I'd prefer the free ass mic.

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    7
B

BlindCowboy

New member
I posted this message on another thread, but it seemed with all the recent purchases of the MXL V57M for $40.00 that there may be a couple of reviews coming up that needed it's own thread. Here's mine.

I was pleasantly surprised. I expected to get burned for $40.00. However, that doesn't seem to be the case. I've got the MXLV93M, 319s, 57s, 58s, and a couple of ATs.

I placed the 57M, 93M and a 319 in a semi circle with equal distance to the source (vocal) and recorded to 3 different tracks. I tested both male vocals, female, and several high pitched giggles from an over-excited 17 month old. (Oddly enough, his high pitched caterwalling is a gift. There's no way I could get that high without a pair of vice grips.) Secondary was acoustic guitar, then harmonica, and lastly, native percussion. (Bongos, rainsticks, etc..)

So that you understand how I feel about my existing mics, my assessment of the V93 M, is a bright, warm mic that seems to grab the source. It seems to be almost hypersensitive and my best recordings come out of a dead room where the mic and source are isolated. Used mostly on vocals/acoustic guitar/amp micing/female vox

The 319, is a darker mic. It tends to thicken up bassier sounds and grab alot of the room's details, not just focusing on the source. I have never gotten a 'crisp' feeling from this mic that I get from the V93M. I use it mainly for acoustic guitar/bluegrass instr./percussions/room micing/etc. It's just a good all around mic.

The V57M cheesy as it may look, sits damn near in the middle of both of these mics. It has the warmth of the 93, but shares the darker coloration of the 319. It 'captured' my son's excitement without any noticable deviation and tended to stay focused on the source instead of the room. It performed well on harmonica, and acoustic guitar micing. Though I prefer the 319 for my percussions that were tested. (Though the rainstick did sound quite nice through it.)

All in all, it was probably the best $40.00 i've spent on my studio. I kick myself for not getting two when I had the chance.

The cheesy though, had to go. It was stripped of it's sheath last night, air sanded the grille and air brushed. The grille band and ring was painted royal blue and the grille got a shot of gold. The body was finished in a dark blue/black and the bottom ring, again, royal blue. Gotta love paint.

BTW. Take the grille off of the 319 and give it a shot of yellow. Totally changes the look of the mic. Makes it stand out bigger than a gold tooth.

Blind Cowboy...
 
I got one at $40, as well. I haven't used it yet, but if it really is a 1006 in an ugly trenchcoat, it will probably be OK.

A country music singer that has been recording on and off in my studio for a year or so went down to Nashville to record a demo. They set him up with a 1006. At $1250/song, I'd be wanting a little more mic than that, but he didn't know any better. Came out OK, though. If he had access to that type of studio musician up here, we could have done damn near as well in my place, and it would have cost him a lot less...
 
BlindCowboy - That sounds sweet. How about a picture?

I bought a 2nd one at the $40 price. I have found this mic to be extremely useable on acoustic guitar, resonator, mandolin, harmonica and male voices. Even at $50, it's a good buy.
 
At first listen, I thought it was a pretty nice sounding mic. It has a scooped sound which makes it sound very clean when speaking into it through headphones. I recorded myself singing through it and it was OK but a little crisp on the high end. I found running the High pass filter on my DMP3 was needed because of the big bottom the mic seems to have. Then I recorded my daughter and it sounded like she was singing with a whistle in her mouth. I had to use a lot of EQ to try and get rid of the sibilance. Really unusable for her voice. I think this would be a problem with doing more than one track on this mic. I think the high frequency build-up would get out of hand quick. I'll have to try it on some other things to see if it works better for them.

My vote; So so

Blessings, Terry
 
I picked up one of these also. I figured for $40 it was a good deal.

According to Brent Casey (formerly with MXL) this is the same mic as the V63. I used to own a V63, and my initial impression was the same as Terry's. Sounded good speaking into it, but when recording vocals I found the sibilance impossible to deal with. So I returned it and got a different mic for vocals. (AT 3035)

However, I thought it sounded pretty decent on acoustic guitar. So when this came up for $40 I grabbed one.
 
I bought two for the price. I like the octavas a bit better though.
 
I already had one from a trade with muzeman and it's become my favorite mic. Granted.....I don't have 'big-bucks' mics but I like it better than my V93 or Rode.
 
Back
Top