Pughbert said:
i use a simple £20 tuner. Its perfectly accurate, far more accurate than any human ear would be in detecting tuning mistakes.
Actually, it's not. The average human ear can hear tuning discrepencies of just less than one cent. The average electronic tuner (anything other than a strobe) is only acurate to within about 2-3 cents, at best. They say they are more acurate than that, but they are talking about laboratory conditions which never exist in real life. In real life, they aren't even close.
For setting intonation, you need a strobe, but for getting your guitar in tune, you need to use your ear, because you guitar will never really sound in tune unless you tune it by ear. You don't want it to be perfectly "in tune" acording to the US Standards deparment, becuase that doesn't compensate for stretched thirds and such. (A perfect third, minor or major, sounds flat to the human ear.) You need to learn how to get your guitar in tune by ear, and then learn what "in tune" to you looks like on your tuner, if you are going to use one at all.
Personally, I usually have to tune differently for different songs. For instance, I do a version of Sting's "I'm Mad About You," and if I leave my guitar the way I normally tune it (which sounds great for most of what I do), the first chord in the bridge sounds like shit. So I have to tune to THAT chord before the song starts, and then the whole song sound just right.
Oh, and if you are going to use a tuner, get a strobe. Built like a tank, and FAR more acurate than anything else on the market. A strobe actually IS more acurate than the human ear, and in real world conditions too.
Light
"Cowards can never be moral."
M.K. Gandhi