Troubles

  • Thread starter Thread starter ParkerParker
  • Start date Start date
P

ParkerParker

New member
So I've always run my microphones (sm57 and sm58) into my BR-864 (cause it's all I have right now) and then to my computer...that's always worked. Recently I have inherited an AKG 3035 and bought a ksm27 and neither one of these condenser mics have worked or picked up anything. the 3035 barely picked up a little noise when I had the gain all the way up, but nothing worth recording. The ksm27 just wont pick up anything. Are these mics duds? I would think, although crappily, the 864's preamp would be enough to get some response out of these mics...what's the deal?

Edit: Is it because the 864 provides no phantom power?
 
condenser mics require phantom power (usually 48 volt)
 
You can get a little box that provides nothing but phantom power (no need to worry about audio quality with a box like that) for 2 or 4 mics for around $30-50 bucks.
 
thanks, I think I may pick up the cheapest Rolls today
 
ParkerParker said:
thanks, I think I may pick up the cheapest Rolls today

If you're spending that much money, you're well on your way to the price of a Peavey PV8, which packs phantom power and four high quality, low noise pres in a mini mixer. Just a thought.
 
dgatwood said:
If you're spending that much money, you're well on your way to the price of a Peavey PV8, which packs phantom power and four high quality, low noise pres in a mini mixer. Just a thought.

You mean so that he can run his mic through 2 cheap preamps now?

Brilliant!
 
Ford Van said:
You mean so that he can run his mic through 2 cheap preamps now?

The PV8 preamps may be inexpensive, but I'd hardly call them cheap. THD is a third that of the DMP3 that so many folks around here seem to praise. They're really nice pres for the price ($35/channel). They'd be really nice pres at 3 times the price.
 
Ok.

So, go check the THD of it compared to a Summit, or old NEVE.

If THD was the only consideration of how a preamp will SOUND, some of the best preamps out there would be considered "crappy". ;)
 
And all that aside, why would you want him to run his mic via 2 different preamps? That just invites all sorts of trouble.
 
Ford Van said:
And all that aside, why would you want him to run his mic via 2 different preamps? That just invites all sorts of trouble.

Nowhere did I say to do that. I would assume that the multitrack recorder in question has line inputs. That's pretty much a given....
 
Ford Van said:
Ok.

So, go check the THD of it compared to a Summit, or old NEVE.

If THD was the only consideration of how a preamp will SOUND, some of the best preamps out there would be considered "crappy". ;)

We're not comparing it to a Neve. We're comparing it to the preamps in a consumer-grade multitrack digital recorder. Let's put this comparison back in context.... :D
 
Back
Top