Tracking a poetry reading.................

  • Thread starter Thread starter VTgreen81
  • Start date Start date
VTgreen81

VTgreen81

Active member
How do I treat this differently than a singer? Or would I? I'm thinking it should have a fairly large amount of room sound. There will be four readers in the performance, and I'm wondering about using a condensor mic on each voice or just going with a pair of overheads for a more live, coffee house kind of sound. First time doing anything like this and it's also my first PAYING customer so I gotta get it close to right.
_________________
 
I've never done this before, but I'd use a combination of room mics and close mics. The room mics can get the audience while the close mics capture the poets. Just mix them to taste. I figure the room mics alone would be too far away from the poets, catching too much of the room and not enough vocal.

EDIT: Are the poets being amplified? If so, then just the overheads should be fine.
 
I have a pair of Audio Technica PZM / boundary mics that are fantastic for this kind of thing - you set them on the desk or on the floor in front of the source and they do a good job. Same thing as business conference mics; they use a flat surface like the table or the floor as a giant microphone. I've used them for tracking operatic and theater work and for sound reinforcement - literally tape them to the front of the stage with gaffer tape.

If this is going to happen after this coming Tuesday, lemme know and I'll pull 'em for you to borrow when you're in town Tues. night (if I can find the cables!). They require phantom power.
 
Just throw up either a blumlein pair or a pair of spaced omnis, no need for close micing.

I record these a lot. Im listening to Jack Kerouac read right now.
 
BigRay said:
Just throw up.
either
a blumlein

pair
or
a
pair of

spaced omnis,
no need for

close
micing.

I record these.
A lot.

Im listening.

To Jack Kerouac:
Read right now.

I can dig that.
 
I'm not a big fan of room mics and using your own " room sound". I'd just use a condenser for each of them, or just two would work also, and add the reverb digitally. after recording then again, you may have a better "room sound" then I do and want to use it, but thats just my opinion.
 
schulteboy said:
BigRay said:
Originally Posted by BigRay

Just throw up.
either
a blumlein

pair
or
a
pair of

spaced omnis,
no need for

close
micing.

I record these.
A lot.

Im listening.

To Jack Kerouac:
Read right now.
I see William Shatner is still doing poetry readings :D

Seriously, to VT Green: IMHO, keep it simple.

G.
 
I've recorded a fair bit of speech in my time, including poetry for BBC radio.

Personally (and I mean personally), I'd get them all miked fairly closely. Not right on the mic as in voiceover, but close enough so you don't hear the room. Maybe a foot or more. Aim for it to sound as if they are in the room with you.

The best formation is to have them all sitting round a table, so they can see each other. You shouldn't isolate them too much - they will often like eye-contact with each other.

Follow the script closely and ride the faders as you record. Don't mute the unused - instead dip the unused mics to about -10dB, so you can fade the next one up quicker, rather than coming all the way up from mute. You can get away with coming up from -10dB on an opening word, but in coming up from mute you'd hear the fade. If each reader has a whole poem each, then you'd probably not need to ride the faders and can get away with kiling each channel until it's needed.

Use some large diaphragm condensors. I tend to favour AKG C414s as these are relatively flat. Avoid mics like Neumann TLM 103s as these add a presence peak and will sound unnatural.

As you're dealing with poetry, you'll probably want this as natural as possible, so avoid compression. Seriously - maybe a little compression to catch any high peaks, but don't allow the voices to get too processed. Ditto EQ - use sparingly.

Make sure your performers don't drink coffee before the recording as this dries out the mouth and will add clicks and clacks. Encourage them to take plenty of water in with them. Listen out for script rustle - even the most experienced actor/VO is guilty of this one. Yes, they will argue that they didn't rustle, but you're in charge so make them do it again... Make sure the readers read the script with their eyes, not their head. By that I mean that a reader can have the habit of bending his head downwards as he reads, and you can hear the sound change as he gets further down the page - keep that head still! Look out for loudly ticking watches, jangley jewelry (my personal nightmare is having to record Mr. T). And say 'no' to laptops - sound obvious, but I've made presenters print out their script during studio time because they thought their 'quiet' laptop with their script on wouldn't pick up on the mic...

Good luck,

A47.
 
ask the poets who are paying how they want it to sound. maybe they want it with a more intamite close micing or a club sound or whatever
 
I would watch out for things to make it sound boring, like overcompression. Others may have ideas on this take.
 
what if the poem is about boredom ... then maybe it would artisticly work :rolleyes: it might be a good idea to know what kind of mood the poets want to set though, and then you can record it so it best reflects that mood
 
Back
Top