
mshilarious
Banned
In case you needed to know, 9VAC @ 20Hz did just the trick!
However your results may vary 


Actually I sincerely believe that if I did the same the results woudl be identical. But out of curiosity, exactly what dumb thing did you do to have that happen?mshilarious said:In case you needed to know, 9VAC @ 20Hz did just the trick!However your results may vary
![]()
Innovations said:Actually I sincerely believe that if I did the same the results woudl be identical. But out of curiosity, exactly what dumb thing did you do to have that happen?
mdarnton said:So, uh, are you saying you had the mic, for this experiment, hooked up as a speaker?
So how did it sound????![]()
Gnash5150 said:I hope that was a NADY ribbon mic!
Please don't say it was a ROYER!![]()
Purge said:This thread is a great example of why mshilarious is one of the greatest members of this board.
So this really was a deliberate act to discover something. I presumed that you had done something by accidentmshilarious said:At 20Hz, not too good. However at frequencies above 1kHz, it works fine although a bit quiet compared to a ribbon tweeter. That was with voltages down in the 0.2VAC range. It would have survived a higher voltage than 9VAC at a higher frequency than 20Hz, but I wasn't interested in that.
This was part of an experiment designed to see if a limiter circuit could protect a ribbon mic against severe reverse voltages. In fact, with the limiter in place, it took up to 28VAC @ 20Hz without hurting the ribbon![]()
I still have more tests to do, I'll have more details later.
Purge said:This thread is a great example of why mshilarious is one of the greatest members of this board.
ez_willis said:He's a smart fucker, just not smart enough to get far, far away from here.![]()
mshilarious said:Nah, an old Shure. And I can reribbon it myself. I will probably purposely toast it a couple more times before I am through![]()
riffy said:Outta curiousity, was it a 300 or 315 mic?