Stand-alone Multi-trackers

[getuhgrip]

I've used several PCI based "break-out boxes" with a few different software packages like N-track and Power Tracks. Currently I'm using ST Audio's C-Port.

I want to move on to a stand-alone box and just use the computer for mastering and tweaking. I'll be recording just myself on guitars, drums and vocals. I'll need enough in's for micing drums.

I have a 12 channel analog mixer, powered monitors, and a Tube MP.

What should I be looking for in terms of features and capabilities? USB out is a must. I assume my mixer will suffice for EQ. Obviously I want as many tracks as possible. I'd like to stay under $500. I'm open to used equipment if nothing new is worth considering at this price point.

I'm watching a few items on ebay:
Yamaha AW1600
Tascan 2488Mkll
Fostex MR16
Korg D3200
Roland VS-1824

Any thoughts on these machines?

 

[avieth]

I want to move on to a stand-alone box and just use the computer for mastering and tweaking. I'll be recording just myself on guitars, drums and vocals. I'll need enough in's for micing drums.

I have a 12 channel analog mixer, powered monitors, and a Tube MP.

This seems like more of a downgrade than 'moving on'. Getting an all-in-one MTR renders your 12 channel mixer useless. If you are trying to get away from the computer, you should get a true standalone MTR. There aren't many digital standalone MTRs since most people just use computers. Something like the Alesis HD24 is all I can think of, but it's at least $1000. Of course, you could always look into an open reel tape machine. Or... try ADAT

 

[getuhgrip]

IMHO, I don't know that I'm really downgrading as much as switching one physical interface for another. Considering the A/D converters and mic pre's, I would think recording quality should remain the same.

It just seems to me to be alot less hassle using a box that is designed with one dedicated purpose. The hardware is chosen and configured specifically for recording.

Many of these machines are dropping bit rate down to 16, but isn't that where we wind up anyway when mixing down to a CD?

I guess what I'm really looking for are valid arguments for or against an all-in-one box vs a PC based system. I'd also like to hear any model-specific input about some of the current offerings.

 

[avieth]

I guess what I'm really looking for are valid arguments for or against an all-in-one box vs a PC based system. I'd also like to hear any model-specific input about some of the current offerings.

You can't go wrong with TASCAM.