Soundproofing

  • Thread starter Thread starter whosyourdaddy00
  • Start date Start date
I assure you a sloping ceiling and other irregularities do nothing to solve low frequency problems. Play a 100 Hz sine wave and walk toward and away from the walls, and you'll see exactly what I mean.

--Ethan [/B]

First off, depending upon the angle of the opposing wall, it CAN stop standing waves. You know that Ethan.

Second, I am willing to bet that most guys control room are even big enough to realize standing waves below around 200Hz or so because their rooms are too small. As I argued long ago with you, a guy in a small room is going to spend better money with some low mid absorption and at least diffusion above that.

Bass traps are NOT a cure all, and in certain rooms are not even going to solve the worst of problems.

There are other mechanical bass traps on the market. A google search will yield useful info and products to consider.

Ed
 
Ed,

> depending upon the angle of the opposing wall, it CAN stop standing waves. <

Okay, so exactly how big an angle is needed to completely stop standing waves? More to the point, since standing waves aren't really the problem anyway, how would angled walls avoid acoustic interference which is the true cause of severe peaks and dips?

> I am willing to bet that most guys control room are even big enough to realize standing waves below around 200Hz or so because their rooms are too small. <

Honest, I have no idea what you are saying there.

> As I argued long ago with you <

There's no need to argue about anything. Science is science, and it's always worth discussing problems and solutions. If you and I disagree about something, I never feel the need to "argue." Let's just go over the points, and maybe I'll convince you or maybe you'll convince me.

> There are other mechanical bass traps on the market. <

Since you yourself said, "Forget about foam in general." we'll rule that out. So what's left that's affordable? I am absolutely being serious. The only tube trap that performs even close to a MiniTrap costs $780. RPG makes nice membrane bass traps, but at $450 for four feet that's out of reach for most folks. And the RPG traps target only a narrow range of frequencies. So what's left?

--Ethan
 
1 - As I recall, 12 degree's will eliminate standing waves. In addition, standing waves and coupling is what your beloved bass traps are hoping to avoid. Those peaks and dips are the result of standing waves and coupling. Personally, I don't care much about what is happening at the back of the room Ethan. It is what I hear at the mix position that counts.

2 - Explain to me how a 12' room can have standing waves at 100Hz and below! You haven't even developed a full wave length in 12'. Indeed, the octaves above can surely present a problem, but the fundamentals themselves pass right on through these small walls, and with the common drywall coverings with airspaces beyond them should quite effectively take care of those low fundamentals. We can talk about the stucture itself contributing, but I seriously doubt your bass traps are going to do much for that either except to add a bit more density to the walls. My comment here should make a lot of sense to you.

3 - Science is a very tricky thing Ethan. Research is full of half baked theories that get thrown out, accepted as truth by the masses. What is scary is when science specific to one thing is applied to situations/things that MUST HAVE other factors considered.

More often than not, people in small acoustical spaces suffer more from blurred transients from hard early reflections at their mix position. This smearing of transients seems to have huge implications in how we percieve the balance of low end relative to upper frequencies. Blah blah blah....I have read quite a bit about ALL the issues concerning acoustics over the years and compared what I have read with what I have observed with audio material I am intimate with via monitors I am intimate with. While not exactly "scientific", I have gained a few insights that have served me well.

What I read little about from people with DEGREE's in acoustical design is bass traps. Mostly, I have read that they can be effective is certain situations where very rigid walls that exceed the physical size of the frequency wave surround the room. This is often not the case in let's say 99% of home studio environments.

I do however read alot about how early reflections need to be dealt with, and how standing waves in mid and upper frequencies can severely effect what one would hear at the mix position.

So I don't know Ethan, I come back again to the fact that you seem to offer little advice to acoustical problems other than bass traps. I call that imcomplete science when your suggestion is always bass traps, when the person asking generally doesn't even discuss the design of their room.

You HAVE to agree that there is value is getting rid of low frequency standing waves/coupling in common contrustion designs. These walls are not made to be super rigid like a proper recording studio would be, thus, these walls are going to let lower frequencies pass right on through, and even if they hit a super rigid surface a few feet later, you now have an air pocket and the wall again to act as a bass trap. That more of less sounds like a bass trap to me! With proper low mid absorbing on these walls, we take care of the frequencies that REALLY mud up the mix position.

Anyway. I think it is prudent to consider the WHOLE structure and the layout of the monitors and mix position when talking about acoustical treatments. That would be "science".

But when only one approach to acoustic treatment is applied to every situation, I call that "quackery".

In any event, there is a guy around here who get's paid to design studio rooms, and continues to make money at that because his designs sound great. He offers MANY approaches to acoustic treatments on his website, and all for free! His designs incorporate these approaches.

The trick is, he knows what approach to apply to a room once he knows ALL the pertinent facts about the room and stucture. This person wouldn't dream of just saying "put diffusion on the back wall" to somebody asking any question about acoustics. Get the hint Ethan? ;)

I just find it troubling that your bass traps are about the only acoustic treatment I see you suggest, even when you don't know a thing about the person's room. Always the link to your website that sells these things.:confused:

4 - You are correct. There are not that many pre-made bass traps out their. It would be interesting though to compare yours with the RPG brand in a situation where they are actually paramount to have in the room. Possibly, the extra money might be worth it for the RPG's. It is impossible to argue which is the better performance vs. price unless they can be directly compared.

But again, since bass traps like these are not usually incorporated in many studio designs, there would indeed be a VERY small market for them.

Ed
 
I was just thinking about how speaker box compression, crossover designs, amplification system with inadequate head room, and summing amps that are inadequate for a mix buss can also cause some pretty significant monitoring problems.

Each their own area of science.

Also, the mess of having speakers close to a wall behind them that is not treated!!! Soffit mounting!!!

Then we could talk a long time about the "budget" monitoring systems on the market that the masses buy! Man, have I heard some doozies!!! All the specs show them as flat, yet at what SPL? In the end, many of these monitors don't translate so well to real world.

So many factors to consider when talking about what we hear in a room. So MANY factors.

Ed
 
What about temperature control in the room? What about humidity control? What about air pressure control?

Ethan, cannot all these things have a significant impact on what we hear in the room?

Lot's of science to discuss here! Where do you want to start?

Ed
 
Ed,

> Lot's of science to discuss here! Where do you want to start? <

Yessss! :D

> As I recall, 12 degree's will eliminate standing waves. <

You're thinking of the minimum angle needed to avoid flutter echo between parallel surfaces. While that does affect "standing waves" at higher frequencies, it does nothing for the stuff below 300 Hz which is the real problem in most rooms.

> Personally, I don't care much about what is happening at the back of the room Ethan. It is what I hear at the mix position that counts. <

I agree 100%. But what many fail to understand is peaks and dips at the mix position are caused by reflections off the walls, floor, and ceiling. This is why bass traps are always put in the corners and often along the rear wall. That's where the damaging reflections occur. Reduce or eliminate reflections off the back wall, and you flatten the response at the mix position.

> Explain to me how a 12' room can have standing waves at 100Hz and below! <

Easy. First, the real culprit is acoustic interference, which is a more general case. The reflections I just mentioned happen at all room boundaries. There is always a null 1/4 wavelength away from every boundary. For 100 Hz that's about 34 inches. There's a corresponding peak at 1/2 wavelength away, which is about 5-1/2 feet. There are other peaks and dips at the wavelength multiples - a null at 3/4 wavelength, a peak at 1/1, and so forth. This happens at all frequencies in all rooms. So for small rooms in particular, where you're within 10 feet of the back wall, the low frequency response is a continuous roller coaster of peaks and dips that skew the response by 20 dB typically. If you have a room in that size range in your house, play a 100 Hz sine wave and walk toward and away from the walls. You'll immediately see what I'm talking about, and realize the importance of bass traps in small rooms.

> I seriously doubt your bass traps are going to do much for that either except to add a bit more density to the walls. <

I can tell you for certain that bass traps make an enormous improvement at 100 Hz in small rooms. Here's a plot of my partner's 10x16x7 control room showing the response with and without wood panel bass traps:

response.gif


But I think you're missing something important. When my partner and I started RealTraps last year, our main products were wood panel bass traps. In April we started selling MiniTraps, which are an entirely different product and work on a completely different principle. Now this is pretty much all we sell. If you get a chance, stop by our site and look at the MiniTraps page. In particular look at the specs, the explanation of how we measured them, and the comparison to other product.

> people in small acoustical spaces suffer more from blurred transients from hard early reflections at their mix position. <

I don't know if they suffer "more" from early reflections, because a response that varies by 20 dB continuously throughout the low end is about as damaging as it gets. But I surely agree that early reflections are a big problem. And as with low frequency peaks and dips, most home studio owners have no idea they even have this problem!

> What I read little about from people with DEGREE's in acoustical design is bass traps. <

Have a look at any book on recording studio design and you will find entire chapters on bass traps.

> these walls are going to let lower frequencies pass right on through, and even if they hit a super rigid surface a few feet later, you now have an air pocket and the wall again to act as a bass trap. <

Yes, a wall that's not massive can serve partially as a bass trap, but that's never a complete LF solution. Unless the wall is very thin, like 1/4 inch plywood, the resonant frequency will be too low to be useful. The biggest problems are from about 80 Hz and above, and a sheetrock wall resonates lower than that. More important, suich absorption is fairly narrow. What's really needed is broadband absorption across the entire bass range, and no standard wall construction can do that.

Since you seem to need convincing that bass traps are even necessary at all, I strongly urge you to play various sine waves and walk toward and away from the walls. I am certain that will change your opinion very quickly.

> I just find it troubling that your bass traps are about the only acoustic treatment I see you suggest, even when you don't know a thing about the person's room. Always the link to your website that sells these things. <

There's another misconception. First, I truly believe that broadband absorption is what all smallish rooms need more than anything else. I've been on this bandwagon for nearly 30 years. I've been selling bass traps for less than one year. I don't need to know anything about the room to suggest bass traps. If it's a room, it needs them! Now, they may need other things, and how many traps and where they go may vary. But the core requirement for broadband trapping is absolutely universal.

Your real misunderstanding here is my advice and links. It is very rare for me to refer people to my company's site. I post here and about 20 other groups every day, and what I always link to is my Acoustics FAQ. This is an unbiased and totally non-commercial article that explains acoustic treatment. Much of the article explains how to build your own treatment. My partner complains that I shouldn't be so free with DIY help because he worries folks will build their own rather than buy. But I feel so strongly about the importance of acoustic treatment that I'd rather see people make their own than go without. You can verify this easily by searching on my name here and in all the other popular newsgroups and web forums.

> It would be interesting though to compare yours with the RPG brand ... It is impossible to argue which is the better performance vs. price unless they can be directly compared. <

That's what absorption specs are for! Again, please go to the RealTraps site and read up a little bit. I suspect you will be very surprised.

> I was just thinking about how speaker box compression, crossover designs, amplification ... What about temperature control <

Yes, all of those are important. But first you have to get rid of the 20 dB LF response variations that are far more damaging!

--Ethan
 
"As chessrock said, the real issue is that my company is the only place you can buy real bass traps for a reasonable price. It's obvious you don't follow my posts here and elsewhere - I spend a huge amount of time helping people for free."

I'm glad you spend time helping people increase their knowledge - I mean that. I benefitted from an article you linked to on this site the other day, and I'm grateful - it was an eye opener for me. But the helping doesn't justify the advertising. Not only that, it's equally obvious that you don't follow posts on this site either - the guy who runs this site, Dave Fiedler, posted his feelings less than a week ago about people who use this site for self promotion. He really dislikes it.

"Please, before you accuse someone of being a spammer, do a little research."

I don't have to do any research to recognize spam. Advertising is advertising. How much research is required for that?

"In fact, the original poster asked specifically what else he could buy besides foam. So how can you fault me for making a suggestion?"

Okay, fair enough. We've each made his point.
 
Dobro,

> But the helping doesn't justify the advertising. <

Again, as I just explained to Ed, it is very rare for me to mention my products. In this case I made an exception in response to the specific question/statement, "I just can't bring myself to spend $600+ on FOAM!!!" No kidding, I'd resent paying that much for $20 worth of foam too. In fact, that's what got me into acoustic treatment in earnest. I hate rip-offs a lot more than most people!

The first company I know of that sold foam was Sonex. I couldn't believe people were actually paying big bucks for foam rubber! As the years went by (this was during the late 1980s and early 1990s) and other companies started selling foam, I'd had enough and approached Electronic Musician magazine to write an article showing how to make real bass traps and absorber panels. They agreed, and to this day my EM article remains one of the most popular I've ever written.

When I wrote my Acoustics FAQ many months ago I spent three entire weeks doing nothing else. I have spent at least another full week adding to it since. In the opening section I wrote, "I have consolidated this information here to provide a single comprehensive source that is free of commercial references." I visit many forums every day posting between 20 and 50 messages, and weeks can go by without me once mentioning my company or my products. This is all I meant by "do a little research." I agree 100% that spam is a distracting nuisance. But sometimes a product recommendation really is the best advice. If someone else - heck, if anyone else - made an effective bass trap for an affordable price I'd be glad to mention that too.

> the guy who runs this site, Dave Fiedler, posted his feelings less than a week ago about people who use this site for self promotion. <

With all of the above explained, do you really still feel my sole purpose here is self-promotion?

--Ethan
 
Come on, guys.


Who here on this board has the level of spam paranoia that I do? :D

If anyone was going to be shouting "spam!" at the top of their lungs, it would be me.

Anyone who accuses Ethan Winer of spam probably doesn't get out on the web very much . . . and probably hasn't read much of this board either, for that matter. :D Ethan has probably done more to hurt his own business by posting and helping people to build their own stuff and do it themselves. And he's been doing it for like the past 5-10 years or so.

I've had a lot of issues with folks in the past . . . and my major beef was usually the fact that they post nothing else even remotely useful or helpful to help offset the spamapalooza.
 
Dobro,

> Okay, fair enough. Sounds reasonable. Sorry, Ethan. <

Thanks. Still friends I hope!

And if you have any acoustics questions let me know. :D

--Ethan
 
FWIW, from a fellow do it your selfer', between F. Alton Everest books, and the very helpful people on the web (Ethan included) I feel you can go a long way. A bit of work, maybe not as pretty, but not much $$.
Thanks to those who went befor, figured all this.... sh** out, then were willing to share it.
:D
Wayne
 
Back
Top