T
tmix
Well-known member
Differences-Yes!
Dana,
I can understand your sceptisizm.
As far as initial Tracking, the program will not make a difference except as far as work flow. Indeed the difference at this point is the front end (mic-per-converters) you use.
However as soon as you start doing anything, I mean ANYTHING as minute as volume changes, you start invoking whatever algorthyms the programmers have written for summing 2 or more signals, scaling volumes, adding EQ,any effects plus the final summing of all tracks to stereo.
At mixdown you would particularly heavily edited-effected , large track count songs.
I did!
Tom
Dana,
I can understand your sceptisizm.
mishappen said:Please
What could possibly make one software program better than another in tracking wav files? Or are you talking about tracking? Does it have something to do with the 1's and 0's in the programing?
As far as initial Tracking, the program will not make a difference except as far as work flow. Indeed the difference at this point is the front end (mic-per-converters) you use.
However as soon as you start doing anything, I mean ANYTHING as minute as volume changes, you start invoking whatever algorthyms the programmers have written for summing 2 or more signals, scaling volumes, adding EQ,any effects plus the final summing of all tracks to stereo.
mishappen said:
If I used samplitude next to sonar and tracked identical parts in each would I hear a difference?
dana
At mixdown you would particularly heavily edited-effected , large track count songs.
I did!
Tom