professional sound

  • Thread starter Thread starter d_squad54
  • Start date Start date
D

d_squad54

New member
What are some things you do to get the most professional sound possible out of these instrument type recordings. (mic placement....recording technique, mastering effects, ect...anything you can think of) Thanks yall, keep rockin. peace.

Acoustic guitar-???


Electric guitar clean-???


Electric guitar Distorted-???


Keyboard-???


Vocals-???
 
1) Artist talent/performance & instruments
2) room acoustics
3) mic selection/placement
4) signal chain to the recorder (mic pre, converters, etc...)
5) engineering skills (mixing/mastering)

In that order....
 
Blue Bear Sound said:
1) Artist talent/performance & instruments
2) room acoustics
3) mic selection/placement
4) signal chain to the recorder (mic pre, converters, etc...)
5) engineering skills (mixing/mastering)

In that order....
That about covers it.
 
d_squad54 said:
What are some things you do to get the most professional sound possible out of these instrument type recordings. (mic placement....recording technique, mastering effects, ect...anything you can think of) Thanks yall, keep rockin. peace.

Acoustic guitar-???


Electric guitar clean-???


Electric guitar Distorted-???


Keyboard-???


Vocals-???


You might ask the questions as it relates to your particular situation. Tell about your room, your acoustic guitar (in that particular instance), etc.

Your original question is just to general and Blue Bear gave you a general answer. A good one at that.
 
Blue Bear Sound said:
1) Artist talent/performance & instruments
2) room acoustics
3) mic selection/placement
4) signal chain to the recorder (mic pre, converters, etc...)
5) engineering skills (mixing/mastering)

In that order....


Number 3 is a part of number 5, which is WAY more important than number 4. Gear can help, but the guy who knows how to use cheap gear is going to do a better job than the guy who doesn't have a clue with his expensive gear.

but other than that, yup.


Light

"Cowards can never be moral."
M.K. Gandhi
 
I'm afraid no one can give you definitive answers, because the path to "professional" sound is dependent on the particular song/room/players/etc. The best way to achieve the skills necessary is to DO IT. Experiment with your equipment, move mics around, play with the controls on that compressor, learn the strengths/weaknesses of your room and monitoring, read up on gain staging and signal flow - do all of this as often as possible until you start to get a "gut feeling" for how it all works. Then you're ready for the next stage: getting it right going in. Using the accumulated knowledge from your experimenting, learn how to get the sounds right at tracking, by using mic selection/positioning, other equipment selection, positioning of the players within the room, use of temporary/makeshift acoustic treatment to overcome room deficiencies. Don't ever think or say "We'll fix it in the mix/editing". If that thought enters your head when hearing playback of a recording pass, you need to go back and get it right. There are going to be lots of things you need to "fix" come mix time, even though you didn't notice them at the tracking stage - no need to complicate matters by keeping a track (or tracks) that you KNOW are going to need fixing.
 
DigitMus said:
I'm afraid no one can give you definitive answers, because the path to "professional" sound is dependent on the particular song/room/players/etc. The best way to achieve the skills necessary is to DO IT. Experiment with your equipment, move mics around, play with the controls on that compressor, learn the strengths/weaknesses of your room and monitoring, read up on gain staging and signal flow - do all of this as often as possible until you start to get a "gut feeling" for how it all works. Then you're ready for the next stage: getting it right going in. Using the accumulated knowledge from your experimenting, learn how to get the sounds right at tracking, by using mic selection/positioning, other equipment selection, positioning of the players within the room, use of temporary/makeshift acoustic treatment to overcome room deficiencies. Don't ever think or say "We'll fix it in the mix/editing". If that thought enters your head when hearing playback of a recording pass, you need to go back and get it right. There are going to be lots of things you need to "fix" come mix time, even though you didn't notice them at the tracking stage - no need to complicate matters by keeping a track (or tracks) that you KNOW are going to need fixing.

Thanks everyone, I was not suprise by any of those replies. I understand there is just to many things that factor in to actually get the sound you are looknig for.

Scott- I wanted to thank you for your post. You encouraged me and gave me some confidence to go ahead with that approach. (The approach I wanted to do and felt more natural) I will continue to experiment and learn.

I am really excited. Recording opens the door for so much more opportunity and expirementing. Good luck everyone, peace.
 
Light said:
Number 3 is a part of number 5, which is WAY more important than number 4. Gear can help, but the guy who knows how to use cheap gear is going to do a better job than the guy who doesn't have a clue with his expensive gear.

but other than that, yup.


Light

"Cowards can never be moral."
M.K. Gandhi
I was torn about that myself, but left it the way I did just to get the point across... But yeah - I agree with you 100%!
 
I would argue that engineering skills has to be number 2, directly behind artist talent. A good engineer knows how to deal properly with everything else below #1 in such a way to still manage well:)
 
Back
Top