B
BJW
New member
Hey,
I went out and ordered a DMP-3 with an option to return it no questions asked within 30 days. I currently use a behringer mx series mixer for my pre's, then I go from the direct outs on the mixer to my Delta 44 sound card and use cubase. I have a decent computer than can handle it all. I plan on doing some back-to-back comparisons (I take it you call that A/B'ing) of the dmp3 and the berry pre's to see if it's really worth the 135 or whatever I ordered it for (I thought that was a pretty good deal). You guys think I'll be returning it or keeping it? Keep in mind I'm on a small budget, so if I could have got a RNP or something higher end, I would have saved up for it, but I'm trying to save some cash for other more important investments (haha, if those exist).
The other thing I'm thinking. The berry mixer I use is an MX-2004A, and they go for about $150 on ebay. I'm thinking I'm going to sell the MX and turn right around and buy a berry UB-802 for $50 or so. I figure I'll have 2 pre's from the dmp3 and all I have are 2 more inputs, so what's the point of having a 20 channel mixer? I've heard over and over again that the berry UB pre's are far above the old MX pre's. Sound like a plan? I know berry has a terrible rep, but like I said, I'm on a tight budget, and I need a mixer (basically for the combo of the pre's and headphones). I was thinking maybe I could save up a bit for a studio projects vtb-1 since it gets some good reviews, that way I'd have the DMP-3, the vtb-1, and the berry UB pre's, so I could get several different options for a pretty low price.
Little more info (about mic's) I use an sm-57 (which I'm hoping, and I've read, that a better pre will really open up the sound on). I use the 57 for instrument recording along with my LD condensor, which is a Superlux. I also use the superlux for vocals. The superlux sounds kind of harsh and thin to my ears (especially on vocals). I bought it about 5 or 6 years ago, and it was a $100 LD condensor, so that might be why it sounds that way. I want to try out a Studio Projects B1. I can get a pretty decent guitar sound if I run my guitar straight in (it's a really nice takamine acoustic/electric) and mice the sound hole and the bridge, so 3 tracks for one guitar - sounds pretty full, especially if I pan the 2 mics right and left a bit. The thing is, i've gotten a much fuller sound (especially on vocals) recording myself live with an sm-58 and a decent digital mixer (I have no idea what kind it was), so I'm thinking the mic pre's in the mixer being higher quality than my berry had a lot to do with it.
Any thoughts/advice would be appreciated.
-Brian
I'll post a link to some of the stuff I've recorded, so you guys can see the quality I'm getting out of my setup with the berry mx pre's and my 2 mic's.
http://www.acidplanet.com/artist.asp?songs=261004&T=7157
If that doesn't work, let me know
Note* The stuff on the acidplanet site that says "live" was recorded with the sm-58 and the digital mixer I was talking about. That's the stuff that I think sounds better (vocally, not with the guitar - the acoutic was just recorded straight in, so it doesn't sound all that good)
I went out and ordered a DMP-3 with an option to return it no questions asked within 30 days. I currently use a behringer mx series mixer for my pre's, then I go from the direct outs on the mixer to my Delta 44 sound card and use cubase. I have a decent computer than can handle it all. I plan on doing some back-to-back comparisons (I take it you call that A/B'ing) of the dmp3 and the berry pre's to see if it's really worth the 135 or whatever I ordered it for (I thought that was a pretty good deal). You guys think I'll be returning it or keeping it? Keep in mind I'm on a small budget, so if I could have got a RNP or something higher end, I would have saved up for it, but I'm trying to save some cash for other more important investments (haha, if those exist).
The other thing I'm thinking. The berry mixer I use is an MX-2004A, and they go for about $150 on ebay. I'm thinking I'm going to sell the MX and turn right around and buy a berry UB-802 for $50 or so. I figure I'll have 2 pre's from the dmp3 and all I have are 2 more inputs, so what's the point of having a 20 channel mixer? I've heard over and over again that the berry UB pre's are far above the old MX pre's. Sound like a plan? I know berry has a terrible rep, but like I said, I'm on a tight budget, and I need a mixer (basically for the combo of the pre's and headphones). I was thinking maybe I could save up a bit for a studio projects vtb-1 since it gets some good reviews, that way I'd have the DMP-3, the vtb-1, and the berry UB pre's, so I could get several different options for a pretty low price.
Little more info (about mic's) I use an sm-57 (which I'm hoping, and I've read, that a better pre will really open up the sound on). I use the 57 for instrument recording along with my LD condensor, which is a Superlux. I also use the superlux for vocals. The superlux sounds kind of harsh and thin to my ears (especially on vocals). I bought it about 5 or 6 years ago, and it was a $100 LD condensor, so that might be why it sounds that way. I want to try out a Studio Projects B1. I can get a pretty decent guitar sound if I run my guitar straight in (it's a really nice takamine acoustic/electric) and mice the sound hole and the bridge, so 3 tracks for one guitar - sounds pretty full, especially if I pan the 2 mics right and left a bit. The thing is, i've gotten a much fuller sound (especially on vocals) recording myself live with an sm-58 and a decent digital mixer (I have no idea what kind it was), so I'm thinking the mic pre's in the mixer being higher quality than my berry had a lot to do with it.
Any thoughts/advice would be appreciated.
-Brian
I'll post a link to some of the stuff I've recorded, so you guys can see the quality I'm getting out of my setup with the berry mx pre's and my 2 mic's.
http://www.acidplanet.com/artist.asp?songs=261004&T=7157
If that doesn't work, let me know
Note* The stuff on the acidplanet site that says "live" was recorded with the sm-58 and the digital mixer I was talking about. That's the stuff that I think sounds better (vocally, not with the guitar - the acoutic was just recorded straight in, so it doesn't sound all that good)