
jpmorris
Tape Wolf
This is you, isn't it JPM
It is, yes. Someone was asking what was involved in the mixing process, so I decided to film it.
This is you, isn't it JPM
Since the end of June, I've been working on a video for a contest at work. It's my ultimate dream to become a film composer, so this is something special to me, and hopefully the beginning of my future career. I used all the same equipment that I used on Lacrimosa (Teac 4-track tape deck, Behringer mixer as preamp, Yamaha digital mixer) but it's been more than a year since I recorded that, and I've learned a bit more since then. Like for instance, how to get rid of most of that pesky noise that plagued Lacrimosa's recording. Here, there's nothing but a pleasing amount of tape hiss.
Listen to the score here:
The Lights of Seven Falls - Score | Joseph Irvin
Watch the video here:
The Lights of Seven Falls FAKE TRAILER - YouTube
Good tune, Jason!
Didn't sound too sloppy to me either!
What speakers do you use to mix on?
Cheers!![]()
This is an interesting thread and a very difficult one because we are analog nuts right? To post a hacked up digital version is not really fair to the intentions of the process right?
My feeling and from experience as a professional is that at this point in time, one can mix for analog or mix for digital. We did a digital record a few years back that we intentionally mixed so it would sound best on crappy things like ipods and computer speakers. Very punchy without a lot of nuance, because that great stuff gets lost when you keep slamming it down with bit rates and compressing the files.
When we played back what we did... on a real proper analog stereo.. tube amps, big Klipsch Forte ll speakers in a proper room.. it sounded horrible. Flat, compressed, lifeless, just like most all digital music sounds.
The last record we did... we recorded it all analog on tape reels and used tube amps for monitoring and mixing down.. and it sounds wonderful in the analog world. I don't like compression, and like to really keep things open and real sounding.. and if you record things properly, you don't need to use EQ or much in the way of outboard gear or other signal processing which really damages the sound in my opinion.
The beautiful recordings we did sounded awful once we dropped them into 24 bit... and worse when dithered down to 16 bit... and really horrid when mp3 ed. So much was lost at each stage of digital compromising.
It's a pretty sad state we are in generally speaking with most everyone using ipods and iphones as their primary listening devices.
Getting back on point.. I would guess that a lot of the recordings posted here sound really good in the analog world.. and not so good here.. so to critic one's work here based upon listening to it on bad speakers and digitally converted just isn't going to show anyone here what is really in the song.
We can hear the melodies and such, arrangement etc.. but beyond that.. it's difficult to critic.
Here's something from a few years back I realized I never shared ... I played in a group named Chelsea Manor 2009-2010 in Austin, TX.
Nice stuff. Incidentally, did you ever get anywhere with the remastered version of 'Oak of the Golden Dream'?
Here goes an album of psyche, shoegaze, acidfolk and weird studio experiments. All recording and mixing is done in the analogue domain, the mastering job is done in digital as we figured it would cost us lots of cash to make an analog mastering without building up more hiss than is already on the recordings.
Sorry about the poor fidelity of the streaming. Download in FLAC if you like it and ain't too broke.
Darling Adharma | Spökraket