Played with Garageband today...wtf

  • Thread starter Thread starter marshall409
  • Start date Start date
how come i can't post any new topics??????

is it because of all the undercover haters giving me negative rep points...

or is the moderator, dragon, and undercover hater?

every forum i goto it seems there's some uptight moderhaters, I am convinced websites would be much much better off with little to no moderation, it's just some bitter idiot banning and deleting things on a whim, that's all it is.
 
pacman9000 said:
how come i can't post any new topics??????

is it because of all the undercover haters giving me negative rep points...

or is the moderator, dragon, and undercover hater?
Click to expand...


you should be able to? i don't think there's anything in place that would prevent you from posting new topics because of your rep or whatever. the board could be messed up, sometimes it acts funny like that. :confused:
 
ok well i hope i can still post i have an important question

rep points:

-36281 points total lol
 
just try it again later, sometimes the board will freeze up or something when you're trying to create a new thread, then it'll show up twice, or just disappear, or it'll say "you've already posted an identical thread" or something like that. it should work eventually. congrats on the rep, thats pretty impressive to rack up that much neg in such a short period of time!
 
pacman9000 said:
that's a given, you're only exposing your own stupidity, who would configure their system to prevent themselves from utilizing a higher sample rate if that was their intention.
Click to expand...

Say what? Oh, I think I get it.

Plenty of people do it all the time. Technical limits aside, the upper cutoff frequency is pretty much arbitrary. A lot of 96kHz units limit their frequency response to 30-40kHz. Why not higher? Ask them.

In my own personal experience, a 48kHz sample rate can provide a smoother sound no matter the frequencies sampled.
 
pacman9000 said:
how come i can't post any new topics??????

is it because of all the undercover haters giving me negative rep points...

or is the moderator, dragon, and undercover hater?

every forum i goto it seems there's some uptight moderhaters, I am convinced websites would be much much better off with little to no moderation, it's just some bitter idiot banning and deleting things on a whim, that's all it is.
Click to expand...

There's not really any moderation here.
 
stockton is a nice place eh?? I used to live down the road aways in Fresno...
 
boingoman said:
Say what? Oh, I think I get it.

Plenty of people do it all the time. Technical limits aside, the upper cutoff frequency is pretty much arbitrary. A lot of 96kHz units limit their frequency response to 30-40kHz. Why not higher? Ask them.

In my own personal experience, a 48kHz sample rate can provide a smoother sound no matter the frequencies sampled.
Click to expand...



smoother then 96khz??


My samples are so smooth i must have sampled them at 96ba (baby's ass).



actually I prefer 12 bit for my drums, with some crunch and warmth, but I never really tried anything other then 44.1, I'm going to try 48 though when I get setup...godammnnit


oh and bits relate to the amplitude, not frequency, just givin you the heads up..
 
-36281 points total Latest Reputation Received

Thread Date Comment

If There's A Program Th... 03-09-2007 16:17 Complete idiot....

If There's A Program Th... 03-09-2007 14:05

If There's A Program Th... 03-09-2007 14:05 Fuckin' hippy

If There's A Program Th... 03-09-2007 09:09 You can't possible think this would be
legit? If so, you are TOO stupid to learn an instrument, yet along record anything.... Dumbass pirate!

Do you really buy that ... 03-09-2007 04:47 fuck off, asshole.
 
pacman9000 said:
stockton is a nice place eh?? I used to live down the road aways in Fresno...
Click to expand...


haha stockton sucks! but compared to Fresno.......

nah it's getting better here, they're building a lot of new crap downtown and it's looking pretty nice. but there's still a ton of crime. on wednesday some lady got robbed at gunpoint 1 block away from my work out on the street in broad daylight! :eek:




so yeah, uh, Garage Band....can't say that i've ever used it... :D
 
pacman9000 said:
-36281 points total Latest Reputation Received

Thread Date Comment

If There's A Program Th... 03-09-2007 16:17 Complete idiot....

If There's A Program Th... 03-09-2007 14:05

If There's A Program Th... 03-09-2007 14:05 Fuckin' hippy

If There's A Program Th... 03-09-2007 09:09 You can't possible think this would be
legit? If so, you are TOO stupid to learn an instrument, yet along record anything.... Dumbass pirate!

Do you really buy that ... 03-09-2007 04:47 fuck off, asshole.
Click to expand...


kinda fucked up that nobody signed any of those!
 
i'M GOING TO POST THIS HERE SINCE I CAN'T MAKE A NEW TOPIC...

Do Different Software Recording Programs Have A Different Overall Sound To Them (ASIDE from effects,eq,plugins,etc)


Because I Know Different Digital Recorders/mixers Have Different Sounds And There Is For Damn Sure A Difference In Sound Between Winamp And Real Player When I Play The Same File (same Song).
 
pacman9000 said:
smoother then 96khz??
Click to expand...

I just used 48 as an example, that higher sampling rates are about more than just increasing frequency resaponse.


pacman9000 said:
and bits relate to the amplitude, not frequency, just givin you the heads up..
Click to expand...

Don't think I mentioned bits anywhere...... :(
 
so you're saying a higher sample rate gives you more dynamic range...I'm pretty sure that a higher bit rate has more of an effect on the dynamic range then the sample rate...but maybe you have information that contradicts this??? I'd love to see it, please share...
 
pacman9000 said:
Do Different Software Recording Programs Have A Different Overall Sound To Them (effects,eq,plugins,etc Aside)


Because I Know Different Digital Recorders/mixers Have Different Sounds And There Is For Damn Sure A Difference In Sound Between Winamp And Real Player When I Play The Same File (same Song).
Click to expand...


try searching. i know there was a pretty big thread a while back about this exact topic. interesting stuff. some people do swear there are noticeable differences. try searching for Samplitude as a keyword, because i know it was discussed that Samplitude was supposedly one of the better sounding programs. just don't go stealing it.

i've tried Acid, Cubase, Samplitude and Reaper, and honestly i never really noticed a marked difference in sound between the programs, but i think thats sort of a subjective matter anyway, because it would be a pain in the ass to precisely duplicate a mix between two programs.

i stuck with Reaper because of the ease of use, nice workflow, PRICE, awesome support, frequent updates and bug fixes, and the customization depth. whether or not the software itself SOUNDS any different than the others is not a huge deal if you can mix worth a shit IMO.



also, i dunno what your thoughts on Winamp are compared to Real Player, but Reaper is actually programmed by the guy who invented winamp. he posts on the Reaper support forum and updates the program weekly if not more.
 
zed32 said:
try searching. i know there was a pretty big thread a while back about this exact topic. interesting stuff. some people do swear there are noticeable differences. try searching for Samplitude as a keyword, because i know it was discussed that Samplitude was supposedly one of the better sounding programs. just don't go stealing it.

i've tried Acid, Cubase, Samplitude and Reaper, and honestly i never really noticed a marked difference in sound between the programs, but i think thats sort of a subjective matter anyway, because it would be a pain in the ass to precisely duplicate a mix between two programs.

i stuck with Reaper because of the ease of use, nice workflow, PRICE, awesome support, frequent updates and bug fixes, and the customization depth. whether or not the software itself SOUNDS any different than the others is not a huge deal if you can mix worth a shit IMO.



also, i dunno what your thoughts on Winamp are compared to Real Player, but Reaper is actually programmed by the guy who invented winamp. he posts on the Reaper support forum and updates the program weekly if not more.
Click to expand...


Thanks for the feedback...


SEE, I love Winamp's ui it's better then Real Player...but Real Players sounds much crisper and clearer and vocals also sound markedly better (more real life sounding)...maybe it's the version of winamp is old or a weaker version but it's 'sound' is definetly inferior to the Real Player app I have...I would rather use Winamp though...


I hope it's not the same with Reaper...great user interface, ease of use but low on sound quality...

Is samplitude a multi-track recording program??

I used Acid briefly, real easy but I think it lacks many features of other software recording progs
 
Samplitude is an awesome multitrack recording program, i really like the mixer section on Samp, and wish that reaper had a similar setup. but Reaper is set up more like Vegas, which is still very user-friendly, just has kind of a boring and plain mixer panel.

i haven't noticed a lack of sound quality at all from Reaper, it sounds as good as whatever you put in it. i think it would probably be cleaner and a more faithful reproduction of sound than Winamp, which is designed as just a playback program and not for critical listening/mixing. at the same time, thats really an apples and oranges comparison.

that said, there was one song i did in Samplitude that i re-mixed in Reaper, and was much more pleased with the results i got in Reaper. but it was a complete remix, so even that isn't a fair comparison. there's a pretty good demo of Samplitude you can get for free, and they make a lite version of samp for $50 which is a good deal. but for $10 less you can get the fully featured version of reaper which towers over Samp SE when it comes to available features.
 
So can Reaper do all or most of the midi stuff that logic/sonar/pt can do?

what's DP????

thanks again, oh yeah and whatever I search for i get "this page cannot be displayed" thing...djfsdjfskldfskldjfsdkfoewifs sdfskdngkln d
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top