Oh... My... God... M-Audio Solaris

  • Thread starter Thread starter Massive Master
  • Start date Start date
Massive Master

Massive Master

www.massivemastering.com
Now to be fair, I have to preface this with the following disclaimer:

These are strictly my first impressions from a headphone mix. No monitors were available for tracking. Headphones were Sony 7506's.

So anyway, I had to record a 65 or 70 piece orchestra Thursday (and again on Friday). I don't have rights to the recordings (Union guys, you know...) so I can't post anything... Yet...

I've had these two M-Audio Solaris mics lying here for weeks, still in the boxes, and figured I'd hang 'em up and give them a whirl (This one is an archive thing, so they're good for testing new gear). They're supported from a crosspipe on a catwalk. 16 feet high, spaced 12 feet, right above the conductor and the first row of strings. Cardioid, no pad, no low cut, slightly angled in and toward center stage. Another experiment there - For another thread. Both mics are plugged into a Behringer (hey, that's what was there) UltraGain 2200 (?) preamp. No cuts, no EQ. Just phantom and level.

It's a Pops presentation, so they're playing Gershwin and the like. They go into Sing, Sing, Sing (a very "jungle beat" oriented swing tune that you'd recognize in a heartbeat if you're not familiar with the title) and my partner in the control booth is wondering why I have this strange look on my face. I handed him the headphones and he's listening for a bit.

The conversation that followed went something like this:

"Great drum mix, dude..." He says. "I didn't know you mic'd up the kit..."

"I didn't..."
He listens for a bit more...

"Those are those mic's we hung earlier?"

"Yup."

"Nothing else..."

"Nope"

"Bull[CENSORED]! You've got something down there... Whadd're ya... Floor mics? What...?"

"Nope - Nothing."

"They've got to be thirty feet from that kit!"

"Yup."


He picks up the binoculars in the booth (around 100 feet from the stage area and looks around). "DUDE?!? That sounds kick-ass!"

"Yup."

"It sounds like you're standing right in front of them!"

"Yup"

"Wow! The horns sound like they're right there!"


The horn section is around 50 feet from the mics.

Anyway, we ran on and on about them. I barely ever took the phones off the whole night. The clarity was unusual. The realism was scary. I could listen "through" the orchestra and pick out any instrument - Like when you're in a room of people talking and you can pick out a single conversation. The detail was... The diaphragms on these things are 3 microns - That's one of the the thinnest diaphragms in the business. It's hard to explain after recording orchestras dozens and dozens of times to hear detail and clarity like that - after using workhorse mics over and over (81's, 414's, 491's, 184's, C-400's, even down to the venerable MC012's).

It's one thing to clearly hear the solo winds in Rhapsody in Blue - It's another thing to hear the other musicians breathing during the solo... And to be able to which person flipped his/her page over in the middle of a crescendo.

Admittedly, these are pretty ugly mics (gotta throw in something bad). However, they seems to kick an awful lot of butt for seriously cheap (I think the list is $349 which would put the GC/MF/SA price right around $299 or $279 or so). Class "A" FET all the way, heavy body... The included and proprietary shock mounts also kick major tail.

I'm assuming by the performance that these mics would be an excellent choice for anything that isn't... too loud... Vocals, acoustic instrument, high overheads & rooms... I would assume that some heavy guitars would kill it (although the specs say different). I would probably opt for its' "little brother," the Luna with a more hearty 5 micron diaphragm. Those might be next on my list...

Anyway, I "should" be able to at least "get a sample" of Friday at some point. The only bitch I've got is that I can't change the "mix" - The piano is beyond the proscenium arch and the lid is opened into the house. The drums (there's a traditional kit center stage) are too damn loud. The fact that they're angled in towards them doesn't help. I needed a Genie to hang the mics, and I'd need it to adjust them also. However, chairs & stands & cables prevent me from doing so. So, I'm stuck with it. But if I can get something up there, I think you'll get a pretty good idea of them.

I only hope that those headphones weren't fooling me too much... Or I've just wasted and awful lot of typing time...
:eek:

Naw - I've tracked through cans enough to know detail like that when I hear it. The overall "color" of the mic is another story - Can't really tell you through the phones. Although, if the specs are any indication, this is a very "pure" sounding mic to begin with.

Just another pleasant surprise from the M-Audio guys...

Hey! That rhymes!

John Scrip - www.massivemastering.com
 
Last edited:
Massive Master said:
The detail was... The diaphragms on these things are 3 microns - That's the thinnest diaphragm in the business. It's hard to explain after recording orchestras dozens and dozens of times to hear detail and clarity like that - after using workhorse mics over and over (81's, 414's, 491's, 184's, C-400's, even down to the venerable MC012's).

Well, Shure's LDs use 2.5 micron disphragms, but... :) It's cool to hear such a positive response. I've been meaning to try this mic out myself, as its right in that price range for me, and I was looking at other multi-pattern mics suitable for an M/S or blumlein setup along with my CAD M179s and SP B3...

I haven't heard anyone say anything bad about the M-Audio QC since the mic has come out, and hopefully it will stay that way...
 
Hmmm...
The Shures are 2.5? Where have you seen this info, thats new to me.
Stephen Paul is the only person that was making anything less than 6 micron for a long time, and the ONLY person to ever make a sub 1 micron capsule.
The Studio Project C4's are 3 micron too, and possible have some Stephen Paul ideas in them.
 
Post corrected - "one of the thinnest"

Gotta tell the M-Audio guys to correct that also... :D
 
John,
Thanks for taking the time to write this. Nice to hear about new mics instead of the same old tired stuff!

:cool:
 
DJL said:
Thanks for the link... it looks like Stephen Paul isn't/wasn't the only person making mics with less than a 6 micron diaphragm anymore... I read somewhere that Neumann is doing it too.

If you knew about Stephen, you would know that he was the first to make a 3 micron, a less than 6 isn't a huge deal. But Stephen and Tony are the only people in the world that can make a sub micron large diaphragm capsule.
 
wow I always thought it was a BabyBottle knock off...seems like it may have better value than the blue.

Also it REALLY PAYS you know what your doing ;)
 
John, just to write that I really enjoyed the spirit and detail of your feedback. I'll surely remember it the next time I hear about or use the M-Audio mics. I'll admit that I've liked everything I've used from M-Audio--preamps and monitors.

Thanks for taking the time,

J.
 
Massive Master said:
...Class "A" FET all the way, heavy body...
Opps... the specs read "Class A FET electronics w/ output transformer", so looks like there's a transformer in there. If the specs are true (20 - 20KHz, +/- 1dB) it's probably a good one too!

OTOH, the Luna does not appear to use a transformer.
 
Massive Master said:
...The diaphragms on these things are 3 microns - That's one of the the thinnest diaphragms in the business...
Hmmmm. A dual 3 micron capsule. I only know of one from China - the one made by 797, same as in the Studio Projects B3.

Justin, do you know anything about this? Is it the same one, or is someone else over there making a dual 3-micron?
 
Justin Hyatt said:
If you knew about Stephen, you would know that he was the first to make a 3 micron, a less than 6 isn't a huge deal. But Stephen and Tony are the only people in the world that can make a sub micron large diaphragm capsule.
Hopefully Tony will teach Brent or someone before he dies... it would be a shame to lose the art.
 
Massive Master,

Do you have a small clip of the recording available for listining?

M-audio Web site claims that to get a matched pair for stereo micing, it is as simple as buying 2 mics because the all mic tolerances are so close +/- 1dB. What you do guys think about this claim?
 
HERE'S THE FILE

M-Audio Solaris Test

The MP3 doesn't do it justice... This is a bit of the rehearsal of Sing, Sing, Sing - It's a bit sloppy, and as stated, it's very drum heavy. However, it should give a pretty good idea of what these babies are worth... Heavily & sloppily edited down to a 2 minute VBR MP3.

Mics -> Behringer preamp -> Sony MD (analog in) -> Apogee converter (44.1/24-bit) -> Edited & normalized -> VBR MP3 - That's it. Nothing done - No pads, EQ, etc.

Something to keep in mind - The kit is around 30 feet from the mics. Horns - 40. String section (I think I edited most of the string parts out) is between 15 & 30 feet. The timpani at the start is around 45 or 50 feet away.

Mics hung as specified in the first post. This is a pretty standard Broadway-sized stage - Proscenium around 35 feet wide, stage width including wings is around 80 feet. Depth around 40 from the apron to the cyclorama. Sprung wood floor, concrete walls on 3 sides, probably 7 or 800 pounds of soft goods dead-hung from a grid system at 20 feet with a 30 foot ceiling height.

JS -

[EDIT]

Here's a slightly "sweetened" version - A little dark plate verb, compression (just a whisker) and the UAD Pultec in "ON" position.

Boy, the more I think about it, if these sound like this through a $100 Behringer preamp, I wonder what they'd sound like through some "real" preamps...

[/EDIT]
 
Last edited:
WOW, that was great. I realize being a newb my opinion is nearly meaningless but, wow. Great stereo image too.

Rob
 
That is amazing. It sounds like the kit is 10ft away. That must be a pretty sweet room.
 
Back
Top