
A Reel Person
It's Too Funky in Here!!!
Cool
Good comments, and I wouldn't necessarily disagree.
Putting it plainly, what you say is maybe "I stop listening".
That may very well be true, to a certain degree, but I 'try' to keep an open ear and an open mind. I am a 'self produced solo artist/homerecordist', after all, and I 'try' to keep my ears and mind open, by definition.
Also, in regard to how music impacts a generation, I agree that 'it's an age-thing', and that the music that impacts a generation 'follows' that generation, or vice-versa, and that every generation has it's defining "art" or "artists".
On the flip side of that, (a little used colloquialism referring to vinyl records), part of the reason that today's music can impact today's younger generation, is that other previously mentioned thing: cultural ignorance.
Music history is a 'long and winding road', as is 'Rock' history, and I think that mediocre or heavily derivative contemporary Rock music has such a big impact on contemporary youth, because they simply don't know their favorite music might be heavily derivative of some older and better Rock music. (IMHO).
FI: anyone who's impressed with 'Marilyn Manson' or 'Mudvayne' were probably not around when 'Alice Cooper' and 'KISS' exploded on the scene, when the 'youth' of 'my generation' got the same thrill, and it all seemed so outrageous. Also, Metallica, as great as they are, in my opinion are still not as good as BLACK SABBATH, DEEP PURPLE, ROBIN TROWER, JIMMY HENDRIX, or even THE WHO, and the likes of artists like that.
I'm part of a generation, and the same 'Generation Gap'-thing applies to me, and I don't hold myself separate from everyone else. What is 'good' is obviously an entirely subjective judgement, and strictly a matter of opinion.
It's turned into an interesting discussion, and I've thought it through (I think), and the clear and concise rebuttal to my own entire argument is: Most 'kids' (contemporary youth) would say flat out that they think 'my' music is BORING, and they're simply not interested in it, period, and I think I probably feel that same way myself, about 'contemporary' music, even though I 'try' to listen, and 'try' to keep an open mind about it... I'm not impressed. At that point, bottom line, what is 'good' is a matter of opinion, which everyone is entitled to have.
It's not all or nothing, folks, and I know very well there are some really 'happening' artists on the contemporary music scene, but none that are particularly memorable to me, and that just shows my own 'cultural ignorance', I'm sure.
I think there's room in music for practically everyone, as long as they want to listen or play or whatever, including all of us 'very underground' and 'obscure' home recordists.
Hey, Tiny Tim had a HUGE music career as compared to most of us on this BBS, so go figure,... but DON'T get me started on KENNY G!
Good comments, and I wouldn't necessarily disagree.
Putting it plainly, what you say is maybe "I stop listening".
That may very well be true, to a certain degree, but I 'try' to keep an open ear and an open mind. I am a 'self produced solo artist/homerecordist', after all, and I 'try' to keep my ears and mind open, by definition.
Also, in regard to how music impacts a generation, I agree that 'it's an age-thing', and that the music that impacts a generation 'follows' that generation, or vice-versa, and that every generation has it's defining "art" or "artists".
On the flip side of that, (a little used colloquialism referring to vinyl records), part of the reason that today's music can impact today's younger generation, is that other previously mentioned thing: cultural ignorance.
Music history is a 'long and winding road', as is 'Rock' history, and I think that mediocre or heavily derivative contemporary Rock music has such a big impact on contemporary youth, because they simply don't know their favorite music might be heavily derivative of some older and better Rock music. (IMHO).
FI: anyone who's impressed with 'Marilyn Manson' or 'Mudvayne' were probably not around when 'Alice Cooper' and 'KISS' exploded on the scene, when the 'youth' of 'my generation' got the same thrill, and it all seemed so outrageous. Also, Metallica, as great as they are, in my opinion are still not as good as BLACK SABBATH, DEEP PURPLE, ROBIN TROWER, JIMMY HENDRIX, or even THE WHO, and the likes of artists like that.
I'm part of a generation, and the same 'Generation Gap'-thing applies to me, and I don't hold myself separate from everyone else. What is 'good' is obviously an entirely subjective judgement, and strictly a matter of opinion.
It's turned into an interesting discussion, and I've thought it through (I think), and the clear and concise rebuttal to my own entire argument is: Most 'kids' (contemporary youth) would say flat out that they think 'my' music is BORING, and they're simply not interested in it, period, and I think I probably feel that same way myself, about 'contemporary' music, even though I 'try' to listen, and 'try' to keep an open mind about it... I'm not impressed. At that point, bottom line, what is 'good' is a matter of opinion, which everyone is entitled to have.
It's not all or nothing, folks, and I know very well there are some really 'happening' artists on the contemporary music scene, but none that are particularly memorable to me, and that just shows my own 'cultural ignorance', I'm sure.
I think there's room in music for practically everyone, as long as they want to listen or play or whatever, including all of us 'very underground' and 'obscure' home recordists.
Hey, Tiny Tim had a HUGE music career as compared to most of us on this BBS, so go figure,... but DON'T get me started on KENNY G!
Last edited: