MXL 603 vs. Rode NT5

  • Thread starter Thread starter dmc777
  • Start date Start date
D

dmc777

New member
Just wondering if any of you guys has had experience with both of these mics. Primarily for an acoustic guitar with a DMP3 pre. Guitars are a Martin D15 all mahogany, and a Seagull Performer Spruce Top and Cherrywood back. Does Rode sound a lot better? I've still found my 603s to sound thin and slightly brittle.
 
...

The Rodes are great in comparison... I own NT4 and NT5 pairs, it's worth it.
 
That's what I was thinking. Thanks for the reply Blue. Anyone else? All info will be appreciated.
 
dmc777 said:
Just wondering if any of you guys has had experience with both of these mics. Primarily for an acoustic guitar with a DMP3 pre. Guitars are a Martin D15 all mahogany, and a Seagull Performer Spruce Top and Cherrywood back. Does Rode sound a lot better? I've still found my 603s to sound thin and slightly brittle.

I use the DMP3 with the 603s and it is neither thin nor brittle on acou guit in my experience. I think you should work on your mic positioning before buying any new mics.
 
...

All mahogany...it doesn't sound good with the 603s, I've tried it with the 00000 Martin...
 
dark guitar with a bright mic is a no go? hmm.
 
dmc777 said:
Just wondering if any of you guys has had experience with both of these mics. Primarily for an acoustic guitar with a DMP3 pre. Guitars are a Martin D15 all mahogany, and a Seagull Performer Spruce Top and Cherrywood back. Does Rode sound a lot better? I've still found my 603s to sound thin and slightly brittle.

Post a sample of something that you think is 'thin' and 'brittle'.
 
cello_pudding said:
dark guitar with a bright mic is a no go? hmm.

Yes, that was my thinking as well. I have used the 603s on both a Webber Rosewood-Cedar OM and a Larrivee Mahogany-cedar D-05 dread and got what I felt were excellent results. Regardless of mic position I usually had to cut some lows when recording the D-05.
 
I'm a 603 fan, I recently picked up some omni-capsules for them and I tell ya, nice change. Say bye bye to proximity boom when working really close.

Like some of the others have said, I don't find them thin or brittle either. I suppose some of that could have to do with placement and the instrument's sound.
 
dmc777 said:
Just wondering if any of you guys has had experience with both of these mics. Primarily for an acoustic guitar with a DMP3 pre. Guitars are a Martin D15 all mahogany, and a Seagull Performer Spruce Top and Cherrywood back. Does Rode sound a lot better? I've still found my 603s to sound thin and slightly brittle.

I usually try the 603s on acoustic guitar before anything else, and its very rare for them to be switched out.

Anywho, I would definitley compare the two myself before dropping the money for the rodes. Guitar Center should have some nt5's readily available I would think...
 
Is the 603 a completely different mic than the 603 M?
I was thinking the only difference was the wire used.

I have a 603 M and I don't see anything brittle in this mic.
It's the only MXL I have and if anything I find it a little to full
for an acoustic.

So I'm wondering if we are talking about the same mic or not.

Never mind I just remembered the one I have is a 63M or V63M
more like the MXL2001. I see you guys are talking about pencil
mics. My bad.
 
Blue Groove said:
It's a hollow sounding guitar, not alot of low mids....

Maybe you are right--that the 603s just isn't a good match for an all mahogany guit. If the guit is that hard to please, though, I'd consider going to some store where I could try a few different mics before buying--or use a different guit for recording.
 
Back
Top