Mic pres: Spend $200 or $2,000 ? ? ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chessrock
  • Start date Start date
Shailat said:
I know when I'm wrong and I'm all wrong here.

Awe come off it already with the sarcasm Shailat!

Im surprised that a professional would come in a bbs specifically catering to amateurs and get into a discussion like this. Comparitive anaysis of Apples...and Oranges.

The main point...for a home recording to sweat over a $2000 Racked Neve Pre is pointless until he has the ability to differentiate. You might be able to tell the difference because of how a ART would translate through an SSL, but you could you tell me how a API translates through a Nady Mixer? Kind of a stupid question isn't it.

A F119 Pratt and Whitney Jet engine is expensive, its fast, its one of the best engines available, would I recommend putting it in Piper Cub? NO!

Yes, the equipment where you work is better, yes it would make a better product,.Did YOU purchase that equipment on a salary of $100,000 or less? very doubtful.
If you did, you need to send me all those crappy Pres, EQ's, Compressors, Gates..etc. And Ill get you at least 1 ART pre.

Eddie was being realistic about HOME RECORDISTS with limited budgets, with a day job (hopefully). Trying to get the amateurs to focus on getting better at recording first, then when a product falls short, you can move up. If I had a business based studio, the product line would be completely different than what I have as a hobbiest.

As far a gear snobs are concerned, they are spec addicts for the most part and it has absolutely nothing to do with equipment. My father-in-law is that kinda person, he buys things that cost as much as possible, the best of the best. Does he use any of it? NO! He spent a gob on his surround system, it sat boxed up for three months. But he had one!

Be realistic, keep the equipment list within the context of home users , telling people what Bad Animals has in Studio B is better, won't help the home recordist track a song with a MXL V67M.

I guess the only way to resolve the thread is by having a group of musicians record 3 songs at Shailats place of work, and repeat it at studio of Eddies choice. Same engineer for both.

Blah blah, yadda yadda yadda!

Peace,
Dennis
 
Is it a nude of Mariah Carey Moshe? Please tell me it is...:) You haven't been around much lately buddy. Got something cool you are working on? Or are you getting in some more active duty with the military there in light of recent events? Or did you find a mistress? ;)

You bet I would *trade* a ART for a NEVE. I would much rather have both though. But come on man, read what I am saying earlier in the post. You KNOW what I mean in the overall picture. People almost commit suicide over the decision to purchase a piece of gear that most can little appreciate, and many are expecting that their recordings are somehow going to sound wonderful because of it. I have MANY wonderful sounding recordings using an ART, and I have FAVORED an ART over other ClassA pre's in production in the past, and will so many times in the future. The difference though is nuance, and in the realm of things, my point is that people should worry less about their damn preamp, and start using ANY preamp and start learning the things about audio production that is going to make a difference. If I slant towards saying to just buy a $100 dollar per channel pre and get on with it, I am saying that in context that many around here that would buy an NEVE, API, Avalon, Drawmer, etc.....would be listening to it through Yorkville monitors, in a room that has so many nodes (and tracking rooms that are even worse...) and putting a Studio Projects mic through it! Damn me for suggesting that maybe they get themselves a $100 pre and spend the $1000 they saved and get something that will REALLY benefit their production, like good monitors, a variety of mics, and some room treatments! THOSE THINGS will make a MUCH MUCH MUCH bigger difference in overall fidelity of a production than the difference between an ART and a NEVE. Listen to my friggin' mp3. Indeed, there were many things that could have been improved on it, but I can assure you that those things had more to do with the damn foam covered wall basement it was tracked in, the limited mic selection, pre-production time to strengthen up playing and source sounds and a more cohesive approach to the mix than it had to do with ART's being used on almost every track. In SPITE of all those above mentioned problems, which you and I KNOW are SIGNIFICANT issues in a productions end quality, that demo turned out sounding VERY professional, and most that hear it cannot guess that it was tracked using gear associated with home recordings. So, you cannot look me dead in the eye and say that your production is going to benefit MORE from investing in a $1200 preamp than it would from fixing MANY OTHER problems. That is just not so. The ART works QUITE well enough to achieve very professional results in the hands of a person that has an idea on what they are doing.

Fuck it. I have heard crap that was recorded on a Mackie to 16 bit ADAT's that blows away productions that have enjoyed more time, ALL KILLER GEAR BEGINNING TO END, etc.... It wasn't the gear that made the difference. It was the engineers willingness to make the most out of what they had.

It is about balance. I am sorry. A $400 preamp is a bad decision over a $200 preamp when you skimp $200 on MONITORS! THAT is what I am saying. A $2500 preamp WILL NOT improve your overall audio quality in the same way as puchasing $2300 worth of decent mics will! That same damn $2300 savings will go a long ways towards room treatments that will help you hear just how bad my all ART preamp recordings really sound! ;)

The jump isn't significant enough. I am tired of everyone around here bitching about how I suggest HIGH DOLLAR solutions for just "home recordings", but by the same token, these same people pronounce a fucking ART as SHIT, and go spend $600 on a preamp that they are going to use in their bedroom!!! That is gall dudes! And there isn't one fucking professional engineer on this site that can disagree with this assesment. I WOULD NOT spend $2500 on a preamp when I have a perfectly usable ART sitting right here that I KNOW will deliver PROFESSIONAL RESULTS to my HOME RECORDINGS when I have a need for $2500 worth of room treatments!

It is about priorities, and mostly around here, they are fucked up. You guys ask for the "best" of something, then put the "worst" price imaginable to pay for it as a condition, then bitch because I point out how that price won't buy your anything that resembles the "best" and even spend the time to illustrate WHY it won't. But then some moron comes back talking how X Brand of this or that has "specs" as good as Y Brand that costs 10 times more so it SHOULD sound just as good right? I mean it IS just a damn home recording.

Tell you all what. Go do a recording just like the one I posted up earlier in this thread. If you are seriously going to do it, contact me and I will tell you on down to the brand of wire that was used on EVERY track, and whether the preamp output passed through a patchbay or not! You can use your Mindprints, and dbx's, and all those other "mid priced" preamps for yours. Let's see what you results are going to be! Certainly, at best, only about as good, unless you can just smoke my pants as an engineer, and I can tell you that if you are THAT good you wouldn't even be talking about "mid priced" pre amps in the first freakin' place.

Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

:D:D:D See, I am still smiling. This is just all bullshit talk. I am playing devils advocate and making you all step up and explain your reasoning for all this talk about preamps. It IS rediculous.

My "real" opinion. Give me a rack full of NEVE's, API's, Manley's, Oram's, Drawmer's, Telefunkens, etc.....ANY day. But I am not so stupid to think that THEY are the reason I get good sounding final products. I have used them, and have used the crap too, and my take is that the pre's are actually very low on the food chain of investment. IF, and few around here are at this "IF" level, you have your engineering chops down cold, all the "important" things like mics, monitors, tracking room acoustics, and control room acoustics, are all in order, and you have clients that are doing something important enough to warrant a huge time investment, well THEN start thinking about preamps. If you are missing ANY of those elements, and ART will work JUST FINE for you. ;) The proof is in the pudding. Don't act like you want to be recording like big boys unless you are prepared to take it all the way. Buying an expensive preamp is a last step in taking it all the way.

Eddie
 
atomictoyz said:


Awe come off it already with the sarcasm Shailat!


In the words of the imortal Blue Bear... "Yikes !!! Shesshhh" !!,
I was kidding around.....


Im surprised that a professional would come in a bbs specifically catering to amateurs and get into a discussion like this. Comparitive anaysis of Apples...and Oranges.
[/quote/


You are so right about that. I get carried away a bit on these threads


The main point...for a home recording to sweat over a $2000 Racked Neve Pre is pointless until he has the ability to differentiate. You might be able to tell the difference because of how a ART would translate through an SSL, but you could you tell me how a API translates through a Nady Mixer? Kind of a stupid question isn't it.

A F119 Pratt and Whitney Jet engine is expensive, its fast, its one of the best engines available, would I recommend putting it in Piper Cub? NO!


Right again.



Yes, the equipment where you work is better, yes it would make a better product,.Did YOU purchase that equipment on a salary of $100,000 or less? very doubtful.
If you did, you need to send me all those crappy Pres, EQ's, Compressors, Gates..etc. And Ill get you at least 1 ART pre.


I own very little of the gear I use. I am as broke as all of you....
I get to use it...I dont get to take it home....


Eddie was being realistic about HOME RECORDISTS with limited budgets, with a day job (hopefully). Trying to get the amateurs to focus on getting better at recording first, then when a product falls short, you can move up. If I had a business based studio, the product line would be completely different than what I have as a hobbiest.


And he was right !. (sheeesh ! how many times can I saw right ?!!? YIkes !!!)



As far a gear snobs are concerned, they are spec addicts for the most part and it has absolutely nothing to do with equipment. My father-in-law is that kinda person, he buys things that cost as much as possible, the best of the best. Does he use any of it? NO! He spent a gob on his surround system, it sat boxed up for three months. But he had one!

Be realistic, keep the equipment list within the context of home users , telling people what Bad Animals has in Studio B is better, won't help the home recordist track a song with a MXL V67M.


I'm working on it
:D
 
sonusman said:

You bet I would *trade* a ART for a NEVE. I would much rather have both though. But come on man, read what I am saying earlier in the post. You KNOW what I mean in the overall picture. People almost commit suicide over the decision to purchase a piece of gear that most can little appreciate, and many are expecting that their recordings are somehow going to sound wonderful because of it.
I have MANY wonderful sounding recordings using an ART, and I have FAVORED an ART over other ClassA pre's in production in the past, and will so many times in the future. The difference though is nuance, and in the realm of things, my point is that people should worry less about their damn preamp, and start using ANY preamp and start learning the things about audio production that is going to make a difference. If I slant towards saying to just buy a $100 dollar per channel pre and get on with it, I am saying that in context that many around here that would buy an NEVE, API, Avalon, Drawmer, etc.....would be listening to it through Yorkville monitors, in a room that has so many nodes (and tracking rooms that are even worse...) and putting a Studio Projects mic through it! Damn me for suggesting that maybe they get themselves a $100 pre and spend the $1000 they saved and get something that will REALLY benefit their production, like good monitors, a variety of mics, and some room treatments! THOSE THINGS will make a MUCH MUCH MUCH bigger difference in overall fidelity of a production than the difference between an ART and a NEVE. Listen to my friggin' mp3. Indeed, there were many things that could have been improved on it, but I can assure you that those things had more to do with the damn foam covered wall basement it was tracked in, the limited mic selection, pre-production time to strengthen up playing and source sounds and a more cohesive approach to the mix than it had to do with ART's being used on almost every track. In SPITE of all those above mentioned problems, which you and I KNOW are SIGNIFICANT issues in a productions end quality, that demo turned out sounding VERY professional, and most that hear it cannot guess that it was tracked using gear associated with home recordings. So, you cannot look me dead in the eye and say that your production is going to benefit MORE from investing in a $1200 preamp than it would from fixing MANY OTHER problems. That is just not so. The ART works QUITE well enough to achieve very professional results in the hands of a person that has an idea on what they are doing.


In all seriousness I take my hat of to you for acheiving a good sound with the gear you use.
A guy working with gear at that level and can reach those results should be called a real engineer

Its a lot harder to work with that kind of stuff then to have somebody hand you a neuman tube mic with a API pre and
I give you full credit.
For the record I once took a live gig Ed did to the studio and played it before a bunch of engineers who were visiting and played it to them. They thought it was a kick ass job.

Ok...I think I kissed his ass enough (fork over the ART pre for my next production a deal is a deal)


Fuck it. I have heard crap that was recorded on a Mackie to 16 bit ADAT's that blows away productions that have enjoyed more time, ALL KILLER GEAR BEGINNING TO END, etc.... It wasn't the gear that made the difference. It was the engineers willingness to make the most out of what they had.

It is about balance. I am sorry. A $400 preamp is a bad decision over a $200 preamp when you skimp $200 on MONITORS! THAT is what I am saying. A $2500 preamp WILL NOT improve your overall audio quality in the same way as puchasing $2300 worth of decent mics will! That same damn $2300 savings will go a long ways towards room treatments that will help you hear just how bad my all ART preamp recordings really sound! ;)

True

The jump isn't significant enough. I am tired of everyone around here bitching about how I suggest HIGH DOLLAR solutions for just "home recordings", but by the same token, these same people pronounce a fucking ART as SHIT, and go spend $600 on a preamp that they are going to use in their bedroom!!! That is gall dudes! And there isn't one fucking professional engineer on this site that can disagree with this assesment. I WOULD NOT spend $2500 on a preamp when I have a perfectly usable ART sitting right here that I KNOW will deliver PROFESSIONAL RESULTS to my HOME RECORDINGS when I have a need for $2500 worth of room treatments!

It is about priorities, and mostly around here, they are fucked up. You guys ask for the "best" of something, then put the "worst" price imaginable to pay for it as a condition, then bitch because I point out how that price won't buy your anything that resembles the "best" and even spend the time to illustrate WHY it won't. But then some moron comes back talking how X Brand of this or that has "specs" as good as Y Brand that costs 10 times more so it SHOULD sound just as good right? I mean it IS just a damn home recording.

Tell you all what. Go do a recording just like the one I posted up earlier in this thread. If you are seriously going to do it, contact me and I will tell you on down to the brand of wire that was used on EVERY track, and whether the preamp output passed through a patchbay or not! You can use your Mindprints, and dbx's, and all those other "mid priced" preamps for yours. Let's see what you results are going to be! Certainly, at best, only about as good, unless you can just smoke my pants as an engineer, and I can tell you that if you are THAT good you wouldn't even be talking about "mid priced" pre amps in the first freakin' place.

Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

:D:D:D See, I am still smiling. This is just all bullshit talk. I am playing devils advocate and making you all step up and explain your reasoning for all this talk about preamps. It IS rediculous.

My "real" opinion. Give me a rack full of NEVE's, API's, Manley's, Oram's, Drawmer's, Telefunkens, etc.....ANY day. But I am not so stupid to think that THEY are the reason I get good sounding final products. I have used them, and have used the crap too, and my take is that the pre's are actually very low on the food chain of investment. IF, and few around here are at this "IF" level, you have your engineering chops down cold, all the "important" things like mics, monitors, tracking room acoustics, and control room acoustics, are all in order, and you have clients that are doing something important enough to warrant a huge time investment, well THEN start thinking about preamps. If you are missing ANY of those elements, and ART will work JUST FINE for you. ;) The proof is in the pudding. Don't act like you want to be recording like big boys unless you are prepared to take it all the way. Buying an expensive preamp is a last step in taking it all the way.

Eddie

Yes you are right. Spending mega bucks on a pre is a waste of money for a home recorder.
I myself said so in the top of my first post.

All I really wanted is to show an excitment I get like goose bumps
when I hear a great peice of gear that can bring me to a different world.

The first real shock I got was when one day many years ago I ran a bass through a mackie pre and then through a API for the fun of it and Woaaa I was hit by lightning. It was for me a world difference. I was never the same after that day even Molder saw a glow in me.....

I must be a real sicko. But that sound can do it for me......I mean sex is great and all but did you ever hear a Western electric on vocals with a full moon shinning at night.....sigh
 
You guys need a course on learning to condense your posts to the most salient points. I think everybody here said the same thing 20 different ways in about 5 paragraphs per point ;)

Tom's story reminds me of my 'audiophile' friend with a mammoth home theatre setup. I have to rewire the system everytime I come over just to watch a fight because he replaced something with a newer unit but never even bothered to hook it up.
 
I have to agree with Randy Yells post..

Come on, Ed, ease up!
The thing is, if everyone in this thread is saying: "Stop talking and start recording", why the hell would this BBS exist?
I mean, we are (at least I am) here to discuss things, to get the best value for money (not the dbx stuff..) and so. Without this, people would have bought tons of VC6Q's, dbx 376's, Art tube mp's etc. And everyone never knew that there is such a thing as a Audiobuddy or a DMP-3... Hell, when I started getting into recording, the only mic pre name I knew was Focusrite... I think I wouldn't be that happy after buying a $350 Trakmaster, and then see a $179 DMP-3.
I do agree that a $2000 mic pre won't make your bedroom (filled of nodes) recording sound good, if the rest of the chain ain't up to par. However, if it is...it will let you know how bad your room actually IS! :D

This summer I have about $1800 to spend. I was thinking:
-Event PS-8 or 2020bas, monitors: $800
-AT 4033 SE, condenser mic: $300
-Joemeek VC1Q, channel strip: $500 (In Holland it is..)
-M Audio DMP-3, 2 channel mic pre $200

Right now I have a Korg D16, and 2 mics: a Sennheiser e609 and a Shure SM57. Guitars, drumcomp, synth, bass, yadayada...
What do you think of this, Ed? Is the chain out of proportion or reasonably matched?
 
bicker bicker

this board really is a disappointment.

There is very little constructive information to be had from this thread, and looking at how this has degenerated into a battle of egos, I could just go over to rec.audio.pro and be entertained by the dimwits there. This is a good forum for info and help, I prefer my entertainment elsewhere.

anyone that would argue wether a neve sounds better than a consumer grade preamp is just a fool. Very reminiscent of that age old Digital vs. Analog argument, as if that was an argument to be had in the first place.

While it is fun to watch people argue over apples and oranges and the cost of spilled milk, it is a shame to not see a constructive platform here.

for those that have had great success with the ART preamp that seems so good here, why not post your singal chain and what you liked about it. Im sure that is of far more value to the person who is looking for an opinion on buying one that some moron saying "well, an art pre is just as good as a neve". Ok dude, good advice. sell me a mackie console to go with that please.

you guys have fun with your board now.

dave
 
:rolleyes: 7 posts and the dude thinks he knows everything about our site here!:mad:

See ya buddy.

Eddie
 
Re: bicker bicker

therealsoundguy said:
this board really is a disappointment.

I could just go over to rec.audio.pro and be entertained by the dimwits there.

dave
Hey, That's "Mr. Dimwit" to you. :D

And exactly which "dimwits" are you refering to over at rec.audio.pro: Steve Albini, Rail J. Rogut, Dan Kennedy, Karl Winkler, David Satz, Scott Dorsey, Robert Orban, me, etc.? Can you be a bit more specific with your insults please?

Nice equipment list, though.
 
Re: bicker bicker

therealsoundguy said:
this board really is a disappointment.

Try Harmony Central...sounds like a board for you.

Bye.
 
yawn.....zzzzzzz

I agree...someone said...CONDENSE those friggin posts...waaaaay too long...

has anything new been said here, anyway??
 
The real soundguy

I my self am a beginner i see and hear what Ed says here, and it is all good solid advice.

he did post up what he used and he showed us all the track we all heard it and talked about it together.

Ed did a lot with very little he pointed out the pros and cons of it all as well.

If anything should be said here by any of us it should be first of all "thank you" for assisting us all, and then this should be an inspiration for all of us to go and use what we have
me included..............and i know Ed has told me that many times before, and even though i frustrated hell out of him you know what in the end it has sunk in, all my lists went into the bin i have alot of nice gear and i know its enough more then enough for me to learn on.

The pros on this site they know who they are give us all a wealth of knowledge here and they dont charge us jack shit for it.

For anyone to care enough to show us all how to save money and still get a good result what can i say they are worth their weight in gold around here because you cant buy real knowledge or experience and this is what they are all giving to us on these forums i personally would like to thank anyone who assisted me here because without your help i might have still been on the gear trail thank goodness for sound advice.

No offence real sound guy but you need to step back a few rungs Ed is probably the last person in here along with the other pros who you need to be knocking they know their shit and many of us do not thats why most of us come here i know i do any great post i read is another piece of helpfull advice i would not get anywhere so please have a little understanding for what a person says before you shoot them down in flames
 
With the amount of bandwidth Sonusman takes up we should just have an "Ask Ed forum". (Good Idea I think).

I can dig the arguement of using the cheaper pres if you have them. But Shalait is right about the High end stuff, Ill probubly not spend $4000 on a pre even if I am a Millionaire because I still have a hard time dealing with the fact that I can have a used car for about that much.

This Is a great site where you can learn alot more about using your gear and how to get the best out of it, so dont rag on the site, dude.
 
Don't act like you want to be recording like big boys unless you are prepared to take it all the way. Buying an expensive preamp is a last step in taking it all the way.


Ed,

I like this side of you. Very inspirational, indeed. Usually you run some of these dudes pretty hard but the point you make here is a point that hits quite close to home with me right now. I'm a total novice...up till about two months ago, I was recording production demos with 4 track. I've stepped up in gear quite a bit in the last couple of months and I am lucky enough to have an engineer friend who lets me come by and help him in the studio. I've learned a LOT that way. THings I have learned in the past 6 months would have taken me years I think, otherwise.

My point is, that at this studio is some NICE gear and in my basement is some pretty nice gear....QUITE nice for a home reccer, I'd say and guess what!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I haven't recorded a damn thing seriously since I got the nicer stuff because I keep saying I'm going to hold off for a few weeks till I get X piece of gear and Y piece of gear. I get this gear snobbery thing from working around sweet stuff at a real studio when the point of helping out there is to hone my skills for my OWN studio and THAT is NOT getting done right now.

With that said, friends, I am a moron and have been saying that a lot lately so Eddie's point is not lost on me.

See....in MY case...10 Neves will not help my recording one bit.


Thanks Ed. I like when you get all deep into this stuff instead of short and sharp....you know you do it sometimes;)



IN CLOSING: I seriously think this site SHOULD do something with some of ED's (and other's as well) contributions. It would be nice to see those long posts Ed did on mixing in kind of a "best of" type archive around here. Might also save on people asking the same questions over and over again.


heylow, suckaz:mad:
 
>to get the best value for money (not the dbx stuff..) and so. Without this, people would have bought tons of VC6Q's, dbx 376's, Art tube mp's etc.<

What? Are you posting to the correct thread? You seem to have missed the point entirely. Are you really dismissing this gear because of what Chessrock posted?:( Did you miss Ed's post? Buh? Wuh? Unh?

Tom Cram
dbx Senior Technical Support
(801) 568-7530
tcram@dbxpro.com

If we don't believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don't believe in it at all.
-Noam Chomsky-
 
Shailat said:


In the words of the imortal Blue Bear... "Yikes !!! Shesshhh" !!,
I was kidding around.....


I know the tone in your typing Shailat :0) I know that form of kidding around quite well, Im nearly an expert at it with my wife when I need some new toy.

Its sucks though doesn't it. When I stopped working with Vic Marrese at Momentum and had to go it alone on my budget I almost cried. When You have sat behind a console with orgasmically smooth pots, not plastic knobs mind you, Knurled Aluminum with a nice anodized finishes that are solidly mounted. I don't miss loading the tape machines though, my splice blocks are at my dads house. But having to go alone with a nearly broke budget allowed me to actually grow as an Audio Engineer, The debugging process is longer and much more painful, you just can't go over and grab another compressor when the one your using develops a noisy pot or something. I just had a brain cramp, maybe interns aught to have to spend 2 months on a Behringer mixer using one compressor /gate/limiter (3630) , one preamp, so on and so forth, then if they can get a 1/2 decent recording than can enter the main event. Then they will appreciate the nicer stuff, maybe even feel like they were given a gift instead of a big head because its their right to be in Studio A. But then again I went backwards didn't I! I think thread like this are helpful regardless of what "therealsoundguy" thinks, it helps everyone see the multiple views required for making educated decisions. If everyone just agreed with one view, they wouldn't understand how or why things are the way they are in the professional realm, as well as how that trickles into the hobbiest, enthusiast and aspiring pro. Even the pros will get into long discussions about these things. Learn and Live.

And just to set the record straight, all individuals who are recordists, from pro to the newest newbie...are gear sluts, not just snobs and junkies. I myself since I was a small child gravitated to my fathers high tech audio equipment, He even gave me his custom power amp and mid-field monitors:0) Knob and nipples..so close, yet so far!

Record on!

Peace,
Dennis
 
Well Atomictoyz the main obstacle as I see it is the wife.........

I am in the process of buying my own gear slowly and surely.
I own a PT rig that set me back a few light years and managed to actully convince the wife to get a solid Tube two compressors and a two vintage RCA pre's with some high quality cables.
I have it all racked up in a SKB case and since I move from studio to studio depending on the project I take it with me.

So.... in my opinion its not a question of $200- $2000 pre but rather will $200 be a sufficent Bribe to the wife to go get some clothes so I can BUY a $2000 pre.
 
Heh heh, My 10 year wedding anniversary is coming up in August, maybe your idea could be more of, a new diamond this year for her, and for me a rack of 8 API channel strips, and a 1 inch 16 track machine? Im barganing with her already of space provisions, she remodels the down stairs family room, I get 1/2 of the garage, 800 sq ft more for me...

The kids and the wife (shes racked :0)) are not really obstacles though, I actually enjoy having them around.


Peace,
Dennis
 
You guys do realize that the only reason Ed is now defending cheap gear is because he has to pay for the stuff himself now ;)
 
Back
Top