J
jonhall5446
New member
If the charge of boosting the sound for the sake of volume is a crime the I am guitly as charged. I continue to see Posts from people in the business of mastering that say you ruin the mix by compressing to a certain volume. So how do you folks (masterersersrss) get the quality and volume out of a recording. I refuse to beleive that this can only be achieved on $100,000.00 worth of mastering equipment. On my first run of recordings I discovered this compressor that would make the tracks louder
I cranked the sucker up. As you might guess it was loud enough but the sound was dead. After some experimenting over several lightyears, I have now found what I believe to be a working relationship between compresseion and eq. It may loose a little pump here and there, or we may see a few peaks, but for the most part it is a good recording for gorilla mastering. I am recording on a digi001 and burning to 16 bit... taking notes on the mix on the way to my day job and then tweaking at night. Repeat about ten times. Trying to balance track volumes and levels the best I can. The bass is a little distorted, which may be what you refer to. When the highs are too high, I adjust in the eq. If I get an ok sound in the end then why spend the money to have it mastered? It sounds good and the people who have heard it say it sounds professional (not all friends by the way). Do I need to have my record mastered? Will it sound bad on the radio? Where will it sound bad? Other than people who know recording in and out I believe it is suitable for ears. The folks who do know recording in and out, I am sure could pick it apart in seconds, but thats not all I am going for here. I want to present and sell a cd that sounds good but without the million dollar budget. I have seen posts scrutinizing us who don't take the time to learn compression, but I can't say that I really want to spend that much time learning it. I rather be playing guitar!
