T
tanoka
New member
Hi HR,
I've spent the past three days at Frankford Wayne in Times Square. My engineer is cutting lacquer off 15 ips 1/4" dolby A preservation LP master which came from the original baked tape. The first plate (20Khz - 20hz) I referenced at home had significant tape hiss, turns out the dolby A needed replacement on the tape machine and didn't work at all, so today I got another plate (15Khz - 20hz) with corrected dobly A.
To me the plate with dolby sounds much better than without but my engineer thought the opposite and offered to cut without dolby limiting the range at (10 or 12 Khz - 20hz) to eliminate most of the hiss even though it's against the rules.
I was wondering if of those two options one is always better than the other in how it subsequently presses to vinyl? Is it crazy to consider both dolby and capping out at 10 or 12 Khz since I still heard some hiss in the dolby plate?
thanks,
Tenyu
here's the reel:
I've spent the past three days at Frankford Wayne in Times Square. My engineer is cutting lacquer off 15 ips 1/4" dolby A preservation LP master which came from the original baked tape. The first plate (20Khz - 20hz) I referenced at home had significant tape hiss, turns out the dolby A needed replacement on the tape machine and didn't work at all, so today I got another plate (15Khz - 20hz) with corrected dobly A.
To me the plate with dolby sounds much better than without but my engineer thought the opposite and offered to cut without dolby limiting the range at (10 or 12 Khz - 20hz) to eliminate most of the hiss even though it's against the rules.
I was wondering if of those two options one is always better than the other in how it subsequently presses to vinyl? Is it crazy to consider both dolby and capping out at 10 or 12 Khz since I still heard some hiss in the dolby plate?
thanks,
Tenyu
here's the reel:
