
masteringhouse
www.masteringhouse.com
When I hear the MC5 shout "kick out the jams, motherfucker", I believe it. Even after ten thousand listens.
Is anyone making an "Authenticity" plug-in?
When I hear the MC5 shout "kick out the jams, motherfucker", I believe it. Even after ten thousand listens.
Mark, buddy, you need to calm down. No one is being anti-metal. I don't see where you got that from. Maybe you're too green to understand what's being said or you simply just haven't critically listened to enough music to get what's being said. For me personally, I'm not anti-modern recording techniques at all. I like it loud and don't particularly care about a lot of dynamics. Hell, I don't use tape and haven't since 1993. My own music and the music I like is a barrage of volume from beginning to end. That Killswitch example you posted is nothing special though. It truly sounds like any other highly polished commercial production job. It's a guitar heavy, robotic, typical modern metal mix. You took offense to the Nickelback comparison, but they really do sound the same as far as production goes. Super loud, super slick, super perfect, heavily processed everything. Those pro productions use pro everything. Those bands have good equipment to start with, and then it's heavily doctored even further in the studio. Layering guitars and using room mics is no new phenomonon. Neither is pristine drum sample replacement. Neither is auto-tune. When you have a million dollar room to record in, and a million dollar budget, it's easy to throw everything in the arsenal at a mix, and that's what they do. Most of us home-recorder hobbyists probably can't even fathom the amount of production that goes into a modern rock mix. The song does lose something though in the process once it's quantized, sanitized, and hit with a spit shine. How angry can you be when you've got major label backing and a pro studio to fuck around in? Listen to a Stooges record. That production sucks, but it sounds ten times angrier and meaner than this stuff. I think that's what turns some of the older generation off of this new stuff. It really is cookie-cutter and contrived. It's not believable. When I hear the MC5 shout "kick out the jams, motherfucker", I believe it. Even after ten thousand listens. Maybe in 30 years people will look back to the good ol 2010's and say "man, those songs and mixes had feeling", but I really doubt it.
A lot of people are VERY anti-metal and other than rap its probably the least respected music genre.
Respected by the masses or not its well known that metal fans are some of the most loyal fans in music. Think about how MANY people love lady gaga, think about how many are as loyal to her as some are to bands like slayer. I don't see anyone carving 'lady gaga' into their arm! (A number of kids I went to high school with had slayer carved into both of their arms....)
Why do I get the feeling I'm being horribly mis-understood (and judged)? I have read interviews. Funny enough this is not "cookie cutter production" For instance, I know they used a lot of room mics for the guitars and did not only do the standard sm57 right next to cab. I also know they layered clean guitars with the distored guitars, which I've not heard of very often for metal. Anyways I'm not asking for how they made the album. Once again, I was simply looking for comments regarding "what you hear" with a technical explanation. How hard is that to understand?
I love how often anti-metal people like you, show their lack of respect for the genre, which to me, comes off as pure ignorance. I don't go listen to a country song and say "thats just auto-tune and cookie cutter production with thousands of clones. Furthermore you need to look at deeper productions". Why? because I dont LISTEN to country so my ears are not tuned to hear the intrices of the music. Not to mention, what are the chances you even listened to the song barret? If you did you'd realize there is no damn auto-tune... What you consider good production is not necessarily what other people consider good production. Being a producer (if you even are), you should know that.
A lot of what Greg says, he has a good basis for and even though I dislike his approach, I do value his opinion. Who the hell are you? I don't even remember seeing a relevant post of yours...![]()
For what it's worth, I co-admin a site called www.metalguitarist.org, and I think the production on this track, from the handful of times I've heard it on rock radio, is about as cookie-cutter as you get. Sample-replaced drums. Check. Mesa Rectifier sound. Check. Angsty, whiny vocals. Check. Clean sparkly bit/stock heavy chug riffing. Check. I probably forgot something, but you get the picture.
I hate to single out anything Andy Sneap's done for even more praise than the guy's already getting (admittedly, totally deservedly), but I'm sitting here at work with the most recent Nevermore going, which is pretty fucking brutal - almost stripped down for a metal album, but very in your face. And, if you want to get even more over the top for metal production, Strapping Young Lad's "Alien" is, well, pretty shocking. Not that I listen to a ton of this stuff, or really go after that sound myself (of Devin Townsend's recorded cannon, I prefer "Terria" to any of his SYL stuff), but if you're really after pretty extreme, cutting edge production, go see if you can find a pretty hi-fi video for SYL's "Love?" on the net somewhere - it's about as accessible as that band ever gets, and man is the chorus just hair-raising.
EDIT - and not that there's even anything that wrong with "cookie cutter" hard rock/metal production. It takes a lot of skill to get anything to sound that polished, and the guys who do that stuff do it VERY well and make a lot of money doing it. I'd just rather hear it a bit less edited and a bit more organic (or, on the other side of the coin, like that SYL disc I mentioned, where Gene Hoglan's performances SOUND like they could have been sample-replaced, but evidently were done totally live, as sort of a challenge to himself, which blows my mind just how tight the guy is).
Most of us home-recorder hobbyists probably can't even fathom the amount of production that goes into a modern rock mix
I'd agree, in making the movie Avatar, each frame had a few hours work on it X 32sec a frame X 3 hour movie. Over 40 people full time just on graphics. Music isnt that intense, but you get the point.
this thread may go off in a tangent I predict
Hey guys! I'm pretty new to the mastering process and I have a lot to learn. I'm curious to what you guys think of the mastering/sound/mix of the song "My Curse" by Killswitch Engage. Please disregard the songwriting. I personally love it but I'm more interested in hearing your opinions of the production. To me this sounds AMAZING! The best metal sound I've ever heard by far. What do you guys think?
PS: Any ideas of how they got that sound would be helpful too!
I think this is just another mix up between what mixing and mastering is![]()
The bottom end sounds "heavy as hell" to you probably because you don't really know any better. I'm gonna assume you're young and these modern digital mixes are all you know.
I didn't say it had no bottom end. I said it is kind of light in the bottom end for something that's supposed to be "heavy" and aggressive. Big difference. I guess, off the top of my head, Green Day's "American Idiot" album is a pretty good example of a modern slick production that has a pretty big bottom end. Listen to the kick and bass. They're pretty big yet not muddy.
Why do you think American idiot has more bottom end?