Raticus said:
Mike...
If you were to use the Sony board... Would you still get to use it features particulary the EQ's and whatever other effects which rewuire you to route the dignal through the board....
Because that would be a very expensive Control surface.... If you could explain how you would use the unit with Nuendo....
THanks
Raticus
Yes. You can use the boards features.
Here's how I have mine set-up:
I run 24 channels. I use the RME 96/52 soundcard for 16 of those channels, and its "daughter board" for the other 8 channels.
The first 8 inputs run to my Yamaha O1V
I can use all of the boards functionality including mic pres, EQ, and other board related effects. Any processing used in this way, goes to the HD that way.
Now it's possible, using the bus routing options in Nuendo, and the O1V's Aux I/O's, to use the O1V's EQ, Dynamics, etc. after recording to the HD.
The second 8 inputs are set up like this:
9&10 run to outboard mic pres.
11&12 are DI from a synth.
13&14 are DI from a drum machine
15&16 run to outboard mic pres.
and all of those 8 are routed to an outboard AD/DA converter.
The final 8 are for future expansion.
Even though I'm only connected to the O1V for 8
inputs, the rest of the boards functions (fader, mute, solo) control the VST multi-track in Nuendo. So, I can control 14 faders and a master in Nuendo, using the O1V.
If I had the Sony, I think I set it up in a similar way, to where if I wanted to use other outboard gear, I'd have that option, without going through the board, but still let the Sony control the entire VST surface.
I know what you mean though. It would be expensive to pay for mic pres, EQ, Dynamics, and other
board related processing functions, if you don't use them.
I believe the Houston, and the Radikal SAC2 control surfaces are just that; Control surfaces, and have no processing capabilities.
But I don't like either one of them.