Les Paul Vs. Stratocaster.

  • Thread starter Thread starter 64Firebird
  • Start date Start date
64Firebird

64Firebird

New member
I'm not trying to start a fight, I just want to take a close look differences between these two fine instruments and hear what other have to say about them.

I've noticed that playing a big full chord like a 7th or 9th chord on my LP sounds like good harmony singers at church. All the notes sort of come together and form a whole. My Strat on the other sounds like a group of professional back up singers. There seems to be a little more separation in the notes of the chord.

I've noticed that the LP is a little bit harder to tune. Likely due to the shorter scale length, you don't have as much room for error, but you don't have to bend the strings as much to get the pitch that you're looking for. The Strat is easier to tune, but the strings are tighter, so bending is more of a chore.

My Strat has the old style fretboard radius (7 1/2 inches I think) so it fits the curve of the hand nicely and makes bar chords easier to play. My LP seems to lend itself more to playing fast lead lines and 2 or three note chords or chord fragments.

My Strat sounds very percussive when playing single notes or chords while my LP sounds sort of spongy and of coarse it has that growl.

I think that if I was the only guitar player in a band, I'd have to go with the Strat. However, if there were two guitar players I feel that one of each would be the ticket.

So, what do you guys think?
 
It's apple to an orange. Different flavors alltogether. I want 5 of each thank you very much.:cool:
 
I agree with you, I own both myself. I'm interested in noting the differances and how people get the most out of each of them.
 
I got a studio LP and I HAD a standard strat but I sold it for a Tele. I want it back!. But I like the Tele and LP combination better. Tele has some kind of fat-er rhythem to it than a strat it seems. LP is just power, Period.
 
I love 'em both.

The LP has a fatter, warmer tone while the Strat has a brighter, more cutting tone. This is generally speaking, of course.
 
Besides the real differences in sound and string tension, there also seems to be a physiological difference resulting from the feel.

The LP feels more solid and "precision" to me, while the Strat feels more "alive". I think this really affects and reflects the way I play either one.

barefoot
 
Yeah. The weight difference definately affects the "feel", obviously. The LP is like a Mercedes 600 while the Strat is more like a Boxter(two fine autos that I've never had the pleasure to drive).

OK. So the LP is like an aged Cabernet while the Strat is like a Beaujolais Nouveau(two fine wines that I have had the pleasure to drive).
 
i have owned both and would have to say that the strat seems to be a lot more versatile.
both are real nice guitars.i used to flip the toggle switch on my lp to the neck pick up then turn the tone controll to full bass and send it thru a cranked up fender twin.man that was a killer blues ton!!

sheppard
 
sheppard said:
i have owned both and would have to say that the strat seems to be a lot more versatile.

Exactly!

But the best scenario is to have at least one of each. ;)
 
I hate the feel of a gibson neck... I'm not sure what it was, when I had mine... but man I just could not be comfortable playing it.....

Strats are for me.
 
hixmix said:
the Strat is more like a Boxter(two fine autos that I've never had the pleasure to drive).

Boxster

loppsboxter.jpg


:cool:
 
Also, be that as it may, there are so many variations of guitars incorporating features of both the LP and the Strat.

E.g., the PRS has the mahagony body of the LP, but compromises the scale length at 25". Also, the various Fat Strat type guitars with the humbucker on a Strat body. And all the varieties of neck radiuses. And all the different pickup types. And all the different body woods. There are so many vairables that it's hard to generalize.

Then again, my 70's Strat and my '02 LP fall into the generalizations nicely. I usually attribute the biggest differences to neck radius for playability and wood, pickup type, and scale length for tone.
 
nice ride Lopp. What do you do for a living?

I'll also chime in and say that each guitar has tones that lend themselves to certain types of playing. For example, ringing tones chordal stuff ala EJ and SRV sound great on Strat, but get kinda lost on a LP. The LP sounds a lot better for certain jazzy things where the tone needs to be fat and thick.
 
Well, lucky you Lopp. One day my ship will come in and I'll post a picture of my 600. :D
 
So how would you compare the SG to the LP and Strat? I have the LP and am trying to decide between the Strat and the SG.
 
LP or SG

Since you have the LP get a Strat before you get a SG.
 
JR#97 said:
nice ride Lopp. What do you do for a living?

Thanks JR and Hixmix.

Pick one of the following:

1. Porn star
2. NFL footbal player
3. Student who is good with Photoshop
4. Decent IP and engineering/tech-related job where I (recently) work long hours during which I snoop frequently into HR.com and spend the rest of my time doing musical endeavors like gigging, practicing, and recording and spend the other rest of my time with my family.

;)
 
How'd you know the answer was #1?

"jack"

Heh.




Be that as it may. When using my LP, I sometimes get this Joe Perry or Zakk Wylde attitude. Never happens with the Strat.
 
im with voxvender, i hate gibson necks. like bolting a baseball bat with one side flattened to a HEAVY guitar body.
i have had a few les pauls and for some things a les paul is better than a strat...sound wise. i like humbucker distortion better than sigle coil distortion. i mainly play blues and i would never use a humbucker guitar for blues. our band does a ZZ top medoly and i use a paul for that....you can't really get that "tres hombres" era zz top sound on a strat.

i will say this though....a les paul is a pretty guitar
i will say this too....a les paul is not a comfortable guitar to play for 4 sets.
 
Back
Top