K
Kasey
New member
I recently visited the home studio of Jim Peterik (the guy that wrote eye of the tiger, I'm a friend of a guy in his current band). The only reason i refer to it as a 'home' studio is because its in his home/mansion. The equipment was better than a lot of the stuff i've seen in top of the line pro studios. he had neumann microphones all over the place (there was a U87 just sitting on the couch...just sitting there) and i saw a really cool ribbon mic (i dont remember the name... the one that looks like a pill...). There were several guitar cabs with large diaphragm condensers on them, a bass amp mic'd with a large diaphragm condenser, then i saw a drumset that was already mic'd. I noticed the small diaphragm overheads, a large diaphragm in the bass drum...a large diaphragm on the snare... a large diaphragm on each mounted tom.. and a large diaphragm on the floor tom. of course i realized that there were no dynamics anywhere... i searched the studio high and low, not a single dynamic. i was tempted to get a 57 and say, 'remember this??'
by the way peterik owns all this stuff but another guy runs the studio, it was him that was showing me around.
is using a large diaphragm on everything common practice in studios today? (at least the ones that can afford it?)
To me this doesnt sound like a very good idea... but what do i know. does anyone else know anything about this?
by the way peterik owns all this stuff but another guy runs the studio, it was him that was showing me around.
is using a large diaphragm on everything common practice in studios today? (at least the ones that can afford it?)
To me this doesnt sound like a very good idea... but what do i know. does anyone else know anything about this?