Industry Standard?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nigelito
  • Start date Start date
N

nigelito

New member
Newbie here! I am recording stuff at home on a very basic set up but get some quite good results generally speaking. However, I recently uploaded those same tunes onto my Ipod and played them in the car - they sound a million miles away from what you hear on TV or the Radio. What are the 'idiots guide to mastering' top tips anyone has got to offer? I'm a complete novice so please keep your terminology at the 'idiot' level! Chiz. (Is there such a thing as the industry standard?)
 
Newbie here! I am recording stuff at home on a very basic set up but get some quite good results generally speaking. However, I recently uploaded those same tunes onto my Ipod and played them in the car - they sound a million miles away from what you hear on TV or the Radio. What are the 'idiots guide to mastering' top tips anyone has got to offer? I'm a complete novice so please keep your terminology at the 'idiot' level! Chiz. (Is there such a thing as the industry standard?)

During and After you have mixed down everything are you using any processing?
Such as compressors , limiters , EQ ?





:cool:
 
1) There is no such thing as "industry standard" sound quality.

2) "Mastering tips" have nothing to do with your issues.

Newbie here!
Nothing wrong with that, but you're comparing your work to work by industry professionals with aggregate decades of experience.
I am recording stuff at home on a very basic set up
Against those professionals working on the state-of-the-art in gear in rooms that are most likely properly set up for the task.

Not trying to discourage - Just offering a touch of reality. It takes some people years and years and years to even find out if they're capable of making good recordings (i.e., if they have the listening skills necessary).

Learn - Experiment - Upgrade your monitoring chain (sorry, I just have to say that) - Listen. It takes time. Could take years - Could take decades - Might not ever happen. Just like anything else, it's not for everyone...

All I can throw at you in the positive are the two actual "rules" of audio --

1) You will only ever be as good as your monitoring chain allows you to be - Period. End of story. No exceptions.

2) Your monitoring chain will only ever be as accurate and consistent as the room they're in allows them to be (again, no exceptions).

Most people I know with a lot of difficulty in this arena are using sub-par monitoring (and/or) in an improperly treated space (i.e., throwing acoustic foam all over the walls and ignoring the actual problems in the room). They make recordings that "sound fine in the room" and they're surprised when they sound like [SELF-CENSORED] everywhere else. Until the monitoring chain is up to the task, anything that sounds fine everywhere else is a lucky shot.
 
John is 100% right.

...And even if there was some sort of industry standard, I'd run screaming in the opposite direction as fast as I could. The industry is "optimizing" for anything but optimal sound, feel, and groove these days.
 
its taken me a year and countless mixes, working at it every day ( i dont work), reading at least 4 books, countless magazine articles and online articles, learning how to use reference tracks, room treatment, better equipment...just to get my mixes to a quality that i find acceptable yet I still get told Ive got a bass build up, or my kicks inaudible..and they're still a million miles from professional productions

thats what youve got to look forward to, if you dont want to go through that then get used to have crap sounding mixes in your car unfortunatley..

I think learning how to critically listen, how to use EQ and compression and how it affects your music is the most important things first of all...

also at the beginning use reference tracks...listen to how produced music sounds on your system and ask yourself whats your track missing..loudness? maybe you need more compression and limiting, a lack of sparkle? maybe you need gains in the high frequencies or cuts in the low...take it from there
 
I just compare my mixes to kcearl's. If they sound like his, I start over. :laughings: :laughings: :drunk:
 
Thanks for your responses - I'm beginning to see what I'm up against! I think I'll be reading that thread for the next 3 weeks! And replacing my monitor speakers in due course!
 
1) There is no such thing as "industry standard" sound quality.

2) "Mastering tips" have nothing to do with your issues.


Nothing wrong with that, but you're comparing your work to work by industry professionals with aggregate decades of experience.

Against those professionals working on the state-of-the-art in gear in rooms that are most likely properly set up for the task.

Not trying to discourage - Just offering a touch of reality. It takes some people years and years and years to even find out if they're capable of making good recordings (i.e., if they have the listening skills necessary).

Learn - Experiment - Upgrade your monitoring chain (sorry, I just have to say that) - Listen. It takes time. Could take years - Could take decades - Might not ever happen. Just like anything else, it's not for everyone...

All I can throw at you in the positive are the two actual "rules" of audio --

1) You will only ever be as good as your monitoring chain allows you to be - Period. End of story. No exceptions.

2) Your monitoring chain will only ever be as accurate and consistent as the room they're in allows them to be (again, no exceptions).

Most people I know with a lot of difficulty in this arena are using sub-par monitoring (and/or) in an improperly treated space (i.e., throwing acoustic foam all over the walls and ignoring the actual problems in the room). They make recordings that "sound fine in the room" and they're surprised when they sound like [SELF-CENSORED] everywhere else. Until the monitoring chain is up to the task, anything that sounds fine everywhere else is a lucky shot.
:drunk: agreed
 
Back
Top