D
dontouch
New member
I apologize if this has been discussed here.
I am mixing a couple songs and they are not consistent in terms of master output. The loudest one(let's call it Mix A) reads "-2.1/-2.4", while the lowest reads(Mix B)"-3.8/-4.2". My question is: a.do I need to make them all peak at the same place? If so, does that mean I must go in and turn up each instrument tracks, and
b. how should I calculate the amount? i.e. if I am to make them all peak at -3.0, do I bring each instrument down 0.9 db on Mix A and up 0.8db on mix B?
And, does it matter if the L and R not peak at the same place? Do you call that an "imbalanced" mix?
AND lastly, is peaking at -2.1 too loud? I use Cubase LE and the -2.1 is read from VST output. (you know, the digit that changes once a while along with the green signal graphic...i don't know what the professional term is).
THANK YOU in advance!!!
I am mixing a couple songs and they are not consistent in terms of master output. The loudest one(let's call it Mix A) reads "-2.1/-2.4", while the lowest reads(Mix B)"-3.8/-4.2". My question is: a.do I need to make them all peak at the same place? If so, does that mean I must go in and turn up each instrument tracks, and
b. how should I calculate the amount? i.e. if I am to make them all peak at -3.0, do I bring each instrument down 0.9 db on Mix A and up 0.8db on mix B?
And, does it matter if the L and R not peak at the same place? Do you call that an "imbalanced" mix?
AND lastly, is peaking at -2.1 too loud? I use Cubase LE and the -2.1 is read from VST output. (you know, the digit that changes once a while along with the green signal graphic...i don't know what the professional term is).
THANK YOU in advance!!!