hello, newbie recording audiobook

  • Thread starter Thread starter timhall11
  • Start date Start date
Checking the files, they are 96Kbps mp3, which for music would probably be an issue, but used strictly for voice, I think that will be fine as it goes out to 15KHz, close to FM radio but it has a "phasey" sound. I'm sure they use that spec to save space, as you get about 14x compression, which saves a lot of storage, and reduces bandwidth as well.

I will agree with Raymond that there are numerous pops and clicks that are evident. The room sound is very strong, and there are the some extraneous noises throughout.
 
Last edited:
If i have understood correctly, you can get the files, but one by one, so it will take a while. If you are wanting your product to be similar to the audio books people listen to, then there’s a fair bit of work to do, and almost certainly some re-recording of some bits. From past experience of a very short project like this, the critical bit is creating a naming system. The one I did was a short story, but in the end we had chapter, page, take, and a letter to indicate success. 2-23-4-G. Chapter 2 page 23 take 4 and G for G. As soon as we had a ‘G’ we moved on, and moved the other takes to a reject folder, just in case. We would then edit the G takes into a complete chapter, and move that to a different folder. Very often we would find mistakes missed later on, and need to re-record them. Because we recorded in batches we marked the floor with mic stand and chair position so the new recordings matched sound wise. I got involved because while reading, he found doing his own recordings very hard, and it created big gaps that took ages to edit out. With me starting stopping and spotting mistakes as they happened it was quicker but it took far, far longer than I expected, and I had not expected this. I guessed three days and quoted him based on that, and it took two weeks of six hours a day. Never again. He didn't get bored at all. For me, it was worse than waiting for paint to dry.

The good things is that your voice works and does not sound out of place. Your real loss I think is just time. Plus, you are listening to the story telling, and missing the other stuff. Odd gaps, noises, changes in your ‘tone’, the occasional missed plosive (poppy breath sound).

I guess you are now downloading like mad. Have you abandoned them as a distributor? Is it done? Or what?
it is done, all four books of it, is all available on the site, and i am now just posting and recording individual poems from my life's work to please the small audience that i have, while i work on editing book one into an audiobook. i am still distributing through substack, although they have screwed me before (once removing all the names from my initial subscriber list of about 120 people, all of whom i know or know of in one way or another, resulting in me not knowing who was or was not reading or how to speak to them. if someone used their own name in their email add. i knew them, but maybe 60% do not. this infuriated me and i protested it 13 months ago to substack mgt. and still have no answer. i will use them as long as i get some advantage out of it. my eyes are going bad and i cannot spend as much time in the laptop as before.)

But if i get you right, you have listened at some length of my work and u r saying yes there are many flaws such as noise and gaps and clicks but that my voice works ok and carries the story and this means people will not hear the flaws as much, so that what clean-up i can do might mean an ok result technically? is that what you mean? what about it passing the examination for audiobooks that they all go through at, where is it, audible.com? did you know of that? i worry that they will be too severe a critic of me because i do violate much of their austere requirements, i confess. i was relying on my fairly effective voice and story-telling and story-writing abilities to carry me. and i think they might, if the result is simply presented to a public, but that might not happen very easily if audible.com rules me too crude.

the other question, as yet unresolved, is how to get the recordings. i could not find an mp3 file within the email of the recording section that goes out each week, and i am told that the subscriber does not receive a file but just a link that then activates the recorded file back at substack, where the site stashes my files and (illegally, really, like the performance of a song is legally separate from its lyrics) will not give them to me. if i cannot get my already-recorded files from substack, i may have to start re-recording. this means a year of work goes unused and unrewarded. and who knows, maybe my voice will change or has changed, or i may be too exhausted to finish recording my crowning (ha) life's work. i am 83 years old. my sister says my voice still does not sound old. did you think it was ok, it sounds like you did. at any rate, if i have to i am game to start again. this time i will sound-proof the room (somewhat) and use a good condenser mike and a pop filter and go legit rather than rogue as before.
 
Just a final note. The MP3 files I downloaded load perfectly into Audacity. I haven't had time to really listen on headphones for quality, or if there might be things that could be done to clean them up.

View attachment 149955

It's a bit of a shame that you didn't find us earlier. The better way to do this would obviously be to record the tracks at home directly to your computer, and not through Substack. But that's water under the bridge, the question now is how much reworking can be done.

At least you have access to all of the previous work. You just need to download the files themselves.
i did meet you long ago. i am also a musician and singer and guitarist, but put that all aside for ten years of writing this novel, an "epic" of my life experience (ha ha). i have recording equipment to make a small studio but have not set it up, and i have been away from my musical side for so long i don't know if i can still do that.

be that as it may, back to your VERY HELPFUL comments (you guys ARE GREAT, INCLUDING THE ONE TH ONE ABOV WHO DID A LOT OF LISTENING!) so there are files that i can access> wonderful! but this confuses me. i do not know how to do it. if i can, will embark on them for book on immediately. this is great news!! also, somebody above recommended a method of marking your files; i have noticed that problem severely while only writing this behemoth. thanks to that colleague of yours!
 
More confused now - we seem to have established you can download the files (as we have been listening to them and commenting) - so just get downloading! It will just take time. If you are happy with it, then no rerecording necessary. It sounds that your major issue is just navigating computers.

We're more interested in recording rather than the content - so the production value that are standard for commercial recordings are our focus. We hear background noises, the odd clicks and pops and stuff like that. You seem very disenfranchised with them, so perhaps it's an eggs and basket thing? If you do the recordings on your equipment, under your control, when the things are finished you upload the files. I think your current system is to record direct to their storage isn't it? If you get annoyed by them - it makes sense to keep the thing on your equipment (AND MAKE BACKUPS FOR SAFETY) then upload it to them if at that point they are still most appropriate.

Remember they don't care what your content is - it's not like traditiional publishers. They have rules, you follow them,.
 
so there are files that i can access> wonderful! but this confuses me. i do not know how to do it. if i can, will embark on them for book on immediately. this is great news!!
When you look at each audio selection, there are 3 dots. Click on the dots and an option to download the mp3 appears.

dload.webp
 
Back
Top