Great River NV-1 Vs. RNP Vs. Grace 101

  • Thread starter Thread starter dudleys100
  • Start date Start date
D

dudleys100

New member
Eventually I need one good pre (within a few months). I was amazed at the sound difference going from my Edirol UA-5 pre's to my Soundtracs Topaz 12-4 pre's. But I want a nice Golden channel, mainly for vocals and some acoustic guitars. I want it to be fairly versatile. I have not heard a lot of pre's to tell if I want some "color" or not, so I need some opinions. Is the RNP going to hold up strong to these others? I only need one channel. I would love to hear some comments. Thanks
 
John Hardy M-1 - $950 - the single best general-application pre under $1K, IMO. Very natural and musical sounding. Extremely well-built. Transformer or tr ansformerless operation. If you're doing any kind of acoustic-based music, this pre is stunning.

Great River MP-1NV - $975 - this pre is built like a tank. I'll have a review of it at Digital Pro Sound on January 14th. The 1NV is heavy on the transformer, which gives the iron in the sound. Although not identical, it's based on a Neve 1073. But unlike the 1073, you can build up lots of tracks with the 1NV and still have a tight recording. If you'r e doing rock or any kind of heavy music, this vintage-sounding pre is the best under $1K, IMO.

A Designs MP-1 - $899 - If you want to get in to a real all-tube pre for under $1K, the MP-1 is it. Awesome bass DI. This pre smoothes out the rough edges. I can't say enough good things about this pre. You're going to be hearing a lot more about it.

Grace Designs 101 - $599 - Very powerful, transparent mic pre. We've tracked a Royer 121 w/ the Grace on a kick drum and it is monsterous. Great pre for acoustic guitar. The least-expensive serious transparent pre.

FMR Audio RNP - $495 - Although this thing looks and feels more like a toy, it's got a great sound that's colored but different from other pres. A little on the dark side as far as sound.

_____________

Dan Richards
Digital Pro Sound
The Listening Sessions
 
Dan, are you covering any of the channel strips on the listening sessions?
 
Yeah, I read that review and it's not fair to tantalize me that way. Look's like the kid's college fund is gonna take a hit.

Would like to see some of the Focusrite stuff on the list if that's possible.
 
Thanks for your posts, that helps me a lot. I would also like to through another one in there. The Sytek with the 2 modded pre's. I really only need one or two channels, so would one channel of sytek be in the ballpark as the Great River etc.? To mention I am using a C-1, and a 603 for most of my mic duties. What is it about the Great River that makes it better for rock and the M-1 better for acoustic. I just am not sure why one would favor a certain type of music more. Thanks.
 
sorry dot, snot, tot, cop. the best under $1000 deal is the 4 channel sytek pre. of course you can't get the burr brown mod anymore. too late suckers! nubs cornered the market.

i got two nubs.
 
sweetie, the old MPX-4Aii was a good deal at 4 channels for under $800, but it's not the best pre under $1000. The jury is still out on the new opamps. The Sytek's great, but it's not up to the quality of pre of any of the ones I listed.

There are other good deals under $1K, like the Ward-Beck retrofits made by Dave Thomas in Canada. Also the older Presonus MP-20 with the Jensen transformers. Also some API mic pres by API and ones made by Brent Averill - although the opamps you get are hit or miss, and there are definitely some that are superior to others.
 
Last edited:
dudleys100 said:
I would also like to through another one in there. The Sytek with the 2 modded pre's. I really only need one or two channels, so would one channel of sytek be in the ballpark as the Great River etc.? To mention I am using a C-1, and a 603 for most of my mic duties. What is it about the Great River that makes it better for rock and the M-1 better for acoustic. I just am not sure why one would favor a certain type of music more. Thanks.

dudleys, the Sytek is very different from the Great River. The Sytek MPX-4 was originally developed for the Neotek Elan console. The Sytek pres are transformerless. Using a transformerless design does a few things: 1. It makes the "slew rate" - basically the speed of the signal in the pre – much faster. These types of pres are better for music with great degrees of dynamics and also instruments that have fast transient attacks – such as snare, cymbals, claves, etc. 2. Transformerless micpres also tend to be much more "transparent" in their treatment of the signal being passed through. These types of pres are favored by classical recordists - which is why you'll find mic pres made by companies such as Millennia being widely used to record orchestras. For more info on this, read the Millennia Design Philosophy.

The Great River MP-1NV is on the other end of the spectrum. Not only does it have a transformer on the output stage, but it also has a transformer on the input stage as well. This does a few things: 1. It slows down the slew rate. 2. Gives the signal being passed through the mic pre a certain "color". To a purist, this would literally be known as a type of effect. Perhaps much desired, but an effect nonetheless. The MP-NV mic pres are based on the Neve 1073, which is known for a "big" sound. The term iron which you might see written when referring to these types of pres, means the iron inside the transformer. The majority of transformers are made with iron and nickel. A sound passing through iron has a certain sound. It also has a way of sort of compressing some of the faster frequencies in the signal -so then, the slower elements of the signal "catch up". That's how you get that in your face sound from certain mic pre manufacturers, such as API, Neve and Manley.

Some of the companies with a transformerless designs are Millennia, Earthworks, Grace and Sytek.

Some of the companies with transformer-based designs are API, Neve [and all of the Neve emulators ], Focusrite and Amek [ both of which are decended from Neve lineage and include Rupert Neve as the designer of many of their products ], Manley and the new FMR Audio RNP.

In modern music, where would you want to apply a transformerless mic pre? On all or most classical music, on Jazz and acoustic-based music such as Bluegrass. Also on drum overheads and stereo miking of piano and acoustic guitar. This is actually why it can be good to buy the first transformerless mic pre you buy to be used as a pair.

Some applications for transformer-based mic pres are in music with less overall dynamics and tonal range - which includes Rock, Hip Hop and other forms of popular "energetic" music in which you want to add some "balls" to the sound. The good thing about a pre like the Great River MP-1NV is that, for the most part [ if you're overdubbing ] – you can easily get away with one channel.

I'll post a little about instrumentation and mic pre selection when I've got a little more time.

Hope that helps.
 
Ward-Beck retrofits made by Dave Thomas in Canada

I saw somewhere that these are acutally broadcast board pres. Just wondering how effective they are at recording?
 
I have both the Sytek and a Hardy M1 and record acoustic instruments a lot. The Sytek is pretty decent, but the Hardy is so clean and clear, it sounds just like your instrument. The Sytek is a bit more dark.

On a limited budget where you need 4 channels, I would recommend the Sytek. If you need the best acoustic sound, the Hardy.

Pete
 
Dot and others,
Thanks for the info!!! It explains much of the questions(in my newbie head) I had...

By the way anyone have opinions on the Speck 5.o pre?

Dot what do you think of the Earthworks uh.. I think its the 201?

TIA

Tony
 
I'm gonna side with DOT over nubs this time.

The Sytek is certainly a great value at something like $200 per channel, but if the question is best sound (not best value) I would definitely go for some of DOT's suggestions over the Sytek.

In my time with the Sytek I found it somewhat boring on vocals at least compared to some of my other pres, and it doesn't react in a very friendly manner to being pushed hard.

In spite of how that sounds, I'm by no means dissing the Sytek - it's a huge step up from Mackie pres, etc. I just don't think it's on the same level as the John Hardy, Great River, etc.
 
notice folks, i said "the best DEAL under $1000 is the sytek" the great river probably sounds a little better, i've heard the two channel and it's good. the sytek does kick the shit out of the grace 101 and on a channel for channel basis its $400 cheaper. it is boring, but clean. i wonder what the harmonic distortion specs are on it? probably almost negligable. what can i say, i spent a lot of time years ago on a Neotek board and loved it. nubinomicron likes clean, he is a clean little boy.
 
Wow, thank you so much DOT, and all of the rest of you. I was getting real close to the Sytek. As I think through it, the Great River is becomeing more tempting. I really would like more "balls" to m y music, thats what I often feel is lacking. We are a mainly acoustic band, but we do things that are closer to pop music like Goo Goo Dolls, and Jars of Clay type stuff. I mainly do single channel overdubs on everything, so I wouldn't need more than 1 and if I did I could use it in conjunction with my Soundtracs board until I could afford say a Sytek or a Grace in the future for an alternate sound. I am also very interested in the info that you have for the future when you have more time. I would love to hear what you got, the things you posted made it much more clear to me, I never fully understood the whole Iron thing, and the differemce between transformer and transformerless. I am going to a pro studio this weekend to get a compilation project mastered, and will be able to play around with some Neve's and API's, so I can hear some Iron first hand. I can't wait. I just gotta say, I love this BBS, it has helped me soo much. I have been doing a project for the last month or so, recording some local bands, and I have had to do about 60-80's of reading along the way to get better at what I was doing. This board has been a majority of that time, and although I don't make a lot of posts, I really appreciate the time you all put into posting here to help us all. It's funny how you start to get to know different personalities on the board, and who has issues with who. Sometimes it feels like the a soap opera, "As the reel to reel turns" maybe. I love it. Anyway, it's late which makes me talk a lot and I had best leave it at that. I do have another question though, and that is about the John Hardy. You say you can turn the Transformer on and off? Does this mean it can have clarity and balls? If so that would be a great thing for an all around pre.
 
sweetnubs said:
i wonder what the harmonic distortion specs are on it? probably almost negligable.

As long as you pad that mic good. Not a lot of headroom to play with there.
 
You say you only need one channel, but wouldn't 2 be so much more versatile? You're pushing the $1000 mark. Consider Davissound TB-10, 2 channels of class A pre for a grand. Coming up very soon- PMI's Toft EC-1 looks a lot like what Grace 101 would be if it were a channel strip. Available imminently, it promises to be a transparent 1 channel pre with EQ and optocompression for list $800. The ATC-2 will be similar, but 2 channels in a 2 rack space unit list-$1300. Just some products you may not have considered.-Richie
 
dudleys100 said:
I do have another question though, and that is about the John Hardy. You say you can turn the Transformer on and off? Does this mean it can have clarity and balls? If so that would be a great thing for an all around pre.

dudley, i could well be wrong here, but i always assumed thatit meant you could order the preamp in either a transformer or transformerless configuration - not that you get both in any single unit.

i guess if i wasn't so damn lazy i'd just go to the website and check it out, but at 2:30 a.m. after a long-ass gig, i'll let someone else do the heavy lifting tonight.

feel free to correct me here if i'm wrong.
 
Oh I didn't realize. I just got back from a studio up here. They mastered a new cd that I just finnish compiling, it's a compilation and it has a bunch of local bands. I recorded 5 of the bands and I was so impressed with the master. It made my mixes sound much more pro. I tried out his Averills (both Neve and API styles) through 4 mics. I first tried the BLUE Bottle, then the Blue Kiwi, U-87, and last an AKG 414. This was great. I found a huge difference between the mics. The Bottle was soo lush and full, while the AKG had a lot less balls. The 87 seemed to have the most definition, but I must say the Kiwi and the bottle were my faves. I guess they kind of "tune" thier mics so they sound like a well EQ'ed mic from the get go. I found I couldn't tell the difference between the two pre's but I could tell a huge diff from the mics. Now I am considering getting a RNP, and a Dragonfly. I get the two for $1000 after shipping. That is roughly the same as the Great River I was planning on. This also gives my two channels and more options. I am also considering the Rode NTK. Please let me know if this is a better route. I currently use a C-1. It sounds great on some of the people I record, but after hearing the difference today, I really think my voice would do well to try a new mic. By the way, thanks Richard for the tips. I talked with the engineer today and I think the idea of getting a pre with a nics built in EQ would be nice. I would like to get a nice EQ in the future, and having it on the pre would kill two birds. Maybe I will start out with the mic/RNP combo now, and then when I get a nicer pre I can get one with EQ. I learned so much today I think I have to digest a lot now, my priorities are shifting a little now that I realize some of the other things I still need to buy to upgrade my setup.
 
Well, I think you're getting there, Dudley. In the long run, I believe neither the Dragonfly or the NTK will turn out to be bad choices. I believe 2 matched channels are always better than 1, and the RNP has impressed a lot of heavy hitters. While you will probably add over time, none of these units will turn out to be a bad purchase. Best of luck.-Richie
 
Back
Top