Bdgr said:
Has anybody else noticed Day 15 is missing?
I did. I was trying to figure out why there seemed to be a lack of continuity and realized there was a party or something and that day was left out.
A few of my opinions regarding people saying:
"Why doesn't MM just quit. I would soooo be out of there"
If memory serves me correct this is his big break. It sounds like he has done lots of engineering (he had passed the producer in the halls before, he mentioned) but he eludes that the big labels were saying "Mixer who?" when the band wanted him in. If he comes out with a good product it could mean a very different career money wise for him. Also, if they band has a big hit I know the Producer get's a % of money from sales, and if I'm not mistaken the chief engineer recieves a smaller portion. He's holding a lottery ticket and is doing anything he can to make it pay off. Who would want to walk away from that knowing that walking would effectively end their chance at working with the big labels?
"Why doesn't the label just pull the plug?"
2 million reasons why. Plus, doesn't the cost of the recording come out of the advance given to the bands? I always understood it to work that way (unless that is just with smaller labels). And if that is the case the label doesn't give a rip how much of the band's money the band is spending to make the record.
"Why doesn't MM exert more control of the sessions"
I think Harvey wisely pointed out many of the reasons why, he's not the one in control of the sessions. As far as not allowing the bass player to sing or the singer to lay guitar tracks, he can't. He's not paying for the studio time, the band is (or the label if my previous assertion was incorrect). He is there to facilitate their creativity and hopefully capture it on tape, not to run how the band goes about playing the music. What if something genious came out of the switcheroo (I know a long shot, but still...)? He can't dictate their creativity. Notice how even the Producer didn't try to stop it but instead, after realizing nothing good was going to come out of it bailed out (because he could!

) and left MM to mop up.
"How can this band stay together when they don't get along?"
"Why do they even bother...they're going to break up anyways?"
I have been here. And while my band wasn't in the studio with 2 mil on the line, we were headed somewhat close to there. I think one thing is that studio's bring out the worst in bandmates. There is something about the experience that is just totally stressful. I think it is that everyone knows that you are laying down what people are going to hear from you until the next album and it's that permanence that makes it so important to each member that it sounds exactly like THEY want it to sound like. The problem arises when people don't see eye to eye. I have heard stories of everything from band's breaking up in the control room, to actual fistfights where the engineers are trying to keep combatants off of the board. It's crazy. Why do they stay together? They know that they have made it further than 99.9% of gigging musicians out there and that they have a chance at something big. There is nothing like a hit record to make members overlook each others disdain and even hatred of each other.....for a little while
"Why the hell is there video games and basketball. Why would a studio even have that stuff around?"
Big label projects last for weeks and oftentimes months on end. It is very rare that everyone is actually present and playing except when laying down drum tracks. Studios offer up these lounges as alternatives to sitting in the control room, to relieve the stress for the members that aren't needed at the time. It's good for the musicians to get away from the music when they don't need to be there. It keeps music related fatigue away, and let's them get away from each other if need be. Unfortunately the engineer is the one who probably needs the most breaks but in reality gets the least.
"If I was there I would run things totally differently..."
I would answer this two ways:
1) That may be why your not there....
or
2) Get there, and while trying to stay there, write and tell us how you are doing it differently
I think it's a great column, but one thing makes me wonder about it's authenticity (or I should say "that it is happening right now")...they had to move the articles because it was being read so heavily. It would seem to me that SOMEONE associated with the project would see these columns and bring it to the attention of the producer or someone else that would land MM in trouble. How many Cotton's can there be in the studio's right now. I know he changed names, but if he really nicknamed that guy Cotton and they are all calling him that, then it would seem this is far from an anonymous band. If the members cought wind of this it would be a disaster. How are they gonna feel reding what he thinks about them? If he just made up the Cotton nickname and the laughter surrounding it, then it's still anonymous because there are lots of crappy drummers in studios right now, but if the name really is being said...well it would just seem he would have too much to lose to really write and release these columns.