However, there is a BIG BUT here.
I am feeling a little "ripped-off in principle" because...
1. Nowhere on the guitar does it say John Lee Hooker or Epiphone USA. It says Sheraton Reissue on the sticker in the F hole. I think the John Lee Hooker everywhere is a little cheesy anyhow but still, that is what is supposed to make this guitar collectible.
YES. Just a discreet JLH signature inlay at one of the upper frets would've been nice.
2. I thought this was a made in the USA model? It says "Assembled In The USA" on a sticker on the back of the headstock.
YES.
3. The pickguard looks like ONE thick piece of plastic and it has a squared edge, it does not show the nice 5 layers with a beveled edge like you expect.
I like my pick guard. It's tortise shell with five layers of black and white binding. It's not beveled but it looks really nice.
4. The "Metal E" on the pickguard is basically an aluminum foil E sticker.
That doesn't really bother me as that was how it was on the original 1964.
5. There is no "stamped original serial number of John Lee Hooker's guitar". There is no stamped serial number at all, just a sticker with a serial number attached to the Epiphone sticker inside the body by the top F hole. The sticker says Epiphone, Inc. Kalamazoo Michigan (for whatever that's worth).
YES.
6. Blank black two layer truss rod cover. No shiny E, no John Lee Hooker on it. Very blah.
Just an engraved "e" logo on it would have been a cool touch on a supposedly $2500 guitar. There was one on the 1964. Why would they leave it blank?
7. This is a HUGE point to me if its true...I think this is a polyurethane finish, not laquer. That is probaly the main reason I took a chance and bought this thing and one of the reasons I expected the value to increase over time. I don't know how to verify this. What would that do to the future resale value of this guitar?
MF ad claims finish is "nitrocellulose laquer" and I believe that's what mine has.
Seems to me that these guys at Musician's Friend are seriously testing the limits of the false advertising laws.
YES. YES. YES. The difference in descriptions of the guitar between the MF ad and the Epiphone site are very confusing and misleading..