
bennychico11
...
Validate?![]()
by saying you were just arguing semantics and saying, yes technically they do actually absorb frequencies when placed on a wall.
maybe you're the one not reading my post
Validate?![]()
Maybe you should spend a little more time researching the absorption coefficient of materials.
http://www.acousticsfirst.com/docs/egg.PDF
I never said another adovates egg cartons for acoustic treatments. Neither do I. I argued that they were "useless". With an absorption coefficient of .40, they perform better than fucking drapes do! It is better than carpet too.
Egg cartons are actually about on par with peg board over fiberboard.
In fact, they rate about as good as PEOPLE do for absorption.
http://www.saecollege.de/reference_material/pages/Coefficient Chart.htm
Check your facts and try to pull your head out of your ass and read what I ACTUALLY say before you try working on me newb.![]()
Yes, they do absorb some frequencies, just not in a way that is appreciable to the human ear.
If you've been in a properly treated room, you'd understand the whole concept better and drop this silly egg carton issue.
I dare you to post your defense of egg cartons on a forum like recording.org's acoustics forum. There are people a lot more knowledgable than I who will provide painful detail as to why you're sadly uninformed.
You seem to be under the very wrong impression that I actually advocate using egg cartons for any kind of acoustical treatment.
Maybe you should go back re-read the whole thread again, this time, keep in mind that I have worked in NUMEROUS studios that have been properly treated, and have helped construct two different studios. John Sayers trusted my knowledge in this field enough to ask me to edit his acoustics guide which he sold to SAE.
You can take your acoustic forum at recording.org and stove it up your ass. Oh wait, your head it there. But maybe there is still room?
Egg cartons have a .80 coefficient between 600-800hz! I can tell you for CERTAINTY that there are MANY rooms where this is a very problematic frequency and absorbing almost all of that frequency would be a god send! Not only have I worked in studios, but have done live sound for far longer that I care to admit, and have mixed sound in every conceivable situation you can think of (including fucking bluegrass bands huddled around a AT 4033 when the stage was RIGHT underneath Interstate 5!!!).
So AGAIN, while far from the best material to treat walls with, it is FAR from "useless". In certain situations, it could be JUST what is needed. It could be a far cry better than your caveman brute force of over-absorption of using OC 703 everywhere!I like you OC 703 guys, you think it solves most everything.
![]()
Remind me again, how seriously are we supposed to take someone who finds it good sport to make fun of people with Downs Syndrome?
Actually, for acoustic treatment, it is FAR from "useless".
Ford Van said:You seem to be under the very wrong impression that I actually advocate using egg cartons for any kind of acoustical treatment.
Egg cartons have a .80 coefficient between 600-800hz! I can tell you for CERTAINTY that there are MANY rooms where this is a very problematic frequency and absorbing almost all of that frequency would be a god send!
Certainly it is possible. What do you really think the probability is that he needs this solution in a home studio ? (serious question)
Thanks.
Ford Van, you might want to get Dana Perino on the job as your spokesperson.
She could look just adorable as she explained you seeming to be on all sides of the same issue at once.
.
Maybe 30-50%
I have been in egg carton rooms (who hasn't if you have been doing this crap for over 20 years!). I can say with certainty that they sound a LOT better than without the egg cartons!
I got it now. You think egg cartons are useful in acoustic treatment, mentally retarded people are fun to taunt and we should take you very seriously.
Thanks for clarifying...
Agreed. It doesn't take much effort or money at all to put some removable bass traps in the corners...
G.
Yes, people like you ARE fun to taunt.![]()
I have issues with LF standing waves in my room. I was considering bass traps, but an article in EQ commented that although bass traps help prevent transmission of low frequencies out of the room by absorbing some of them, this meant that more bass frequencies would actually be reflected back into the room. This wouldn't be a great result in my situation...if this is true?
I'd have to read the article to see exactly what it's saying, but what you describe makes no sense. Bass traps work exactly because they help break up and absorb room reflections.I have issues with LF standing waves in my room. I was considering bass traps, but an article in EQ commented that although bass traps help prevent transmission of low frequencies out of the room by absorbing some of them, this meant that more bass frequencies would actually be reflected back into the room. This wouldn't be a great result in my situation...if this is true?
I have issues with LF standing waves in my room. I was considering bass traps, but an article in EQ commented that although bass traps help prevent transmission of low frequencies out of the room by absorbing some of them, this meant that more bass frequencies would actually be reflected back into the room. This wouldn't be a great result in my situation...if this is true?
(which I understand Ford Van despises almost as much as he hates mentally retarded people) .
I see. What grade are you in?![]()