christiaan said:
How about cutting back on overclocking? That would be one of the first things I'd look at.
why.. i have the system clocked perfectly.. it runs cool and its powerful.. just not powerful enough to track/mix at 88.6 or 96. i've been doing all my stuff at 48k
DAFFYDRUNK said:
Ditto. the 2500 can do it fine, but you have to be sure it's cooling reasonably well and you're bumping the voltage a bit. Once I set my cpu voltage to 1.7v my machine never crashes and I'v sat here and worked with some fairly elaborite stuff for hours on end with no probs... even if the machine has been on for a few days I can still spend 6 hours messing with acid without problems. I might have 30+ tracks with 1-3 plugins on each one so I figure I'm giving the thing a pretty intense workout......
my cpu has never seen 50degrees. its cooled very well.. water cooled and i have 2 nice case fans. the cpu after a heavy load was at 45degrees.. thats nothing seeing that back in the day my old xp2000 would be around 60 at all times.
as for voltage.. i never change cpu voltage.. just the front side clock.. set it to 200...xp2500 runs at 2.2gig which is a xp3000.
my system might get terned off once or twice a week.. i usually put it in standby mode or just leave it on allday.
track count wise.. the xp2500 is a workhorse, but it performs better overclocked.. i track everything 32/48(32bit float)
everything done under nuendo 2.1
i usually run 32+ tracks.
i usually run 2-3 different reverbs, sometimes more
1-2 Group tracks
almost all vox have a Waves Rvox. some with eq some with out. then when i get to the mix i'll have the xp2500 at 80-90% at times... i'm getting ready to get the 3.2gig P4 and then i'll get me a Dual cpu system.
as for the Quad..no app will take use of the power so it makes no since to build it