Does
a Studio Projects T3, really sound like a C12?
Forgive me if I quote an old joke: "Only if dropped from 6 feet to a concrete floor." ;-)
Seriously, I'm interested in the answer too. I take it you mean, does the T-3 sound ENOUGH like a C12 to warrant using it for recording under circumstances where I might otherwise use the C12?
Considering all the factors involved in creating tube mic, from designing the power supply to deciding which cable to use to link the mic with PSU, to the design of the mic itself and the choice of available tubes, how close can ANY tube mic come to sounding like any other?
For every C-1 out there, I wonder how many T-3's are in use. I contacted a fairly heavy seller of Studio Projects mics who said he had lots of C-1s in stock (although he still anticipated running out quickly) but only one each of the C-3 and T-3. Has anyone reading this actually had a chance to purchase and use a T-3? More than one T-3? Perhaps it's the relative complexity involved with external power supplies and hot valve mics, but I'm just wondering if the T-3 is really comparable to ANYTHING other than another T-3.
I'm not being cynical, just curious. I'm very excited about the Studio Projects mics and very supportive of what they're doing. But there is a LOT of difference between a $200 condenser and a $649 tube mic with PSU, including the stiffer compeition at the higher price-point (
the AKG Solid Tube, the Rode NTK, a used
AT4060 or GT
AM62, the powered Marshalls and ADK tube condensers, etc.).
Any T-3 users who can comment and compare?
Many thanks,
Mark H.