Do you really buy that expensive recording software?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fantastic_Mad
  • Start date Start date

Do you buy that expensive recording software, or just download it?(Read authors post)

  • I buy it. I like to support the creator.

    Votes: 564 41.2%
  • I download it. To hell with the creator.

    Votes: 305 22.3%
  • I do both. I have mixed feelings on the subject.

    Votes: 501 36.6%

  • Total voters
    1,370
Status
Not open for further replies.
There was no hot air. I stated you don't offer anything that shows you can speak intelligently on the submit of marketing software and I stand by that. For some odd reason you believe that all you have to do is create software (as if it was cheap and easy to do) and then you never have to do anything else but just sit back while money just pours in from every direction forever.

How can somebody be so cluelessly wrong. Once the product is out in the market my fixed costs remain. I still have office space to pay for, utilities to pay for, maintenance/service costs on the equipment and software my developers use, professional IT staff to keep my systems running and provide proper disaster recovery to protect the expensive investments I've made in software development, audio engineering experts to provide me with algorithms and models for all the complex signal processing that goes into my software, salaries for my office staff, legal/marketing/distribution costs, and the list goes on. My marketing plan is based on selling so many units per given unit of time and I need those continued sales in order to not only cover those costs but also to provide continued support for the product. Any idea what percentage of the life cycle development costs of a product occur AFTER the product hits the market? I seriously doubt it. Modifying code at any step of a typical development cycle costs about 10 times what it cost to change it in the previous stage of that cycle. Modifying delivered production code is OUTRAGEOUSLY EXPENSIVE to do. The biggest component of my costs go to the highly skilled developers I still have to employ to add the features you want yet brag about not paying for.

Let's not even get started on the R&D costs of developing the next generation of the software. I can't stay in business forever on the current product so I have to CONSTANTLY be looking for new ideas and new technologies to take advantage of in the future. I have to push the boundaries and make major improvements every so often and release a new product with those new and radical features using new and radical technologies that weren't even a wild dream when I first conceived of the current product. That costs huge money too. Ever think of that? Where do you think I get the money to pay for those costs? From the money I make selling TODAY'S product, of course. What do you think the software companies do, sail the high seas in their pirate ships, brazenly flying their Jolly Rogers while they pirat-ize peaceful, honest vessels? :p

That's not a hard assed view on piracy. It's a view based on a) many years of experience in multiple aspects of the business, and b) the fact that I understand what theft of service is - illegal. That's what software piracy is, plain and simple. You seem to have this asinine idea that pirates are sticking it to the rich, that they deserve to have it stuck to them, and that the masses should be thanking the pirates for awakening them to the atrocities thrust upon them. What nonsense. A doctor won't let you sit in his/her office while he/she sees paying patients. A lawyer won't let you sit in his/her office while he/she discusses cases with paying clients. A financial planner won't let you sit on sessions with paying clients. A tutor won't let you sit in while he/she tutors struggling, honest students. A university won't let you sit in on classes attended by paying students. The cable company won't let you tap into their lines to get every porn channel known to man. Those are all thefts of service, just like software piracy.

How about you leave your door open so all of us with hard ass views on piracy come over and use your studio when you're not there. You've bragged endlessly here about what a dishonest businessman you are so I would *never* consider using you to be my engineer, no matter how extensive your skills or how reasonable your rates are. However, if you're out taking your dog for a walk, at your girlfriend's house getting some, on vacation, or whatever, then you're clearly not using your studio. That means there are plenty of times I'm ENTITLED to just walk into your home or place of business and use everything for free, right? Right?! You weren't using it so there's no harm in me doing it. It's just there for the taking.

Convince me that if you came home after being away for a week and saw that someone broke into your home/studio while you were away, you wouldn't call the police. No, not you, you'd assume it was some poor person with outrageous audio engineering skills who has been ripped off by the rich fat cats who make pro audio gear. You'd of course conclude that person deserves to use your studio for free because "the man" has been sticking it to them and that's the reason they can't afford their own gear. And altruistic you wouldn't stop there. No way!!!!! You'd find out who they are so you could invite them and all their highly skilled yet poor colleagues to record for free in your studio anytime they wanted.

Puh-lease ...... Like I said, give me some facts that you can back up. Give me facts you learned from real experience. All you keep throwing out are the same illogical ideas about the rich software companies are purposely screwing the little guy. They're doing nothing of the kind. They're making business plans that maximizes the money they can make from a product. If their research shows they can make more money by selling fewer units for more money then that's EXACTLY what they'll do. If they're research instead shows that they'll make more money from selling many more units of lower priced units that's EXACTLY what they'll do. Of course, they'll only do that if they've proved to themselves that they'll be able to sell - are you paying attention? - THE RIGHT NUMBER OF LEGITIMATE COPIES AT THAT LOW PRICE. If they can't sell enough then they'll look for another business model, like selling fewer high priced units. If that happens then guess what - that would be YOUR fault. So who's the person screwing the little guy, hmmm?

:p

Keep in mind, that I have this entire time been more on about music piracy than software, which is a very different business. Music piracy IS sticking it to the rich fat cats...the artists are screwed one way or another, as per the record label's business model. You want to see some dishonest businessmen, look there. I've bragged about being a dishonest businessman? Obviously you're at it again with your assumptions. BTW, I don't tend to do engineering professionally. I'm more on the creative side of production, scoring, songwriting, arranging, remixing, stuff like that... I do engineer out of necessity but I don't bill myself as that.

You make better points than most, and I can agree with you. You kind of miss what I'm saying a bit, but at least you can go beyond the shit that is usual on this subject. It's a good analogy kind of with the service thing, however it's only if you view software as a service and not a product. It's more of a matter of interpretation as to whether that analogy works. I would consider theft of service more like if you were coding for a company and they refused to pay you afterwords. And what you keep missing is, that I do buy all the software I can afford. I do understand that there is a vast amount of work put into software, and do believe that one should support these hard working individuals. One of the only gripes that I do have is when you get a company charging the same price for a plugin as the entire logic studio. You obviously are intimate with the world of software development, so you tell me..what's going to take more money to create? I mean, as a professional in creating software, I would think you would see that for what ridiculousness it is.

To be honest. If someone wanted to ask me to use my gear when I wasn't using it, sure why not? I'd love the opportunity to help out someone who isn't able to afford anything on their own. I believe in treating people as I would like to be treated. So yes, if you wanted to use my studio, for free, when I wasn't using it, because you were unfortunate enough to be too poor to afford it, my answer is..I'd welcome it with open arms. Then again, I know what it is to go through the gutter. My life experiences make me feel for people in that sort of situation, but that's besides the point. Of course, this would only be when I weren't using my gear. I mean, if it's just going to sit there when I'm away, why shouldn't I help someone else out who is in need. Life isn't all about money, my friend.

Never said anything about rich software companies screwing everyone. I did mention some companies with their heads up their asses as far as what to charge for their prices in some cases. When I'm mentioning these huge conglomerates and sticking it to them, I'm speaking of big media and their products... music. It's a different industry than you are in, and if you aren't aware of the reality of that industry (record labels), then I suggest either doing some research on the subject, or talk to anyone (even big names) who's been under contract with one such a company, and see what they think about the way they've been "taken care of".

Software that is astronomically priced is far more pirated than something that more people on a normal budget can afford. What's the most pirated software? Photoshop. Seen the prices for that piece of software? I could spend a ton of time citing this and that to you, but really why bother? That information isn't hard to find with some net searches. I can see your thinking, however there is a much higher chance of mass piracy of software that is way too expensive for everyone, than something people can afford. If you throw an insane price tag on something, due to the fact that piracy is an option, the multitudes who can't afford it, will turn to piracy. The internet, and P2P has caused a few industries to have to adjust their business models or die. Now, there is another option, so because of that, regardless of who thinks what is right or wrong, one must adapt or die.. Believe it or not, a lot of people who are demonized for downloading pirated software are just as likely to buy everything they can as the next guy.

I can assure you, not one company has lost money on account of my piracy, as when I can afford it, I buy it, just as if piracy weren't an option. There are some who don't care about buying anything, that's for them to work out. I always do my best.
 
...
And what you keep missing is, that I do buy all the software I can afford. I do understand that there is a vast amount of work put into software, and do believe that one should support these hard working individuals. One of the only gripes that I do have is when you get a company charging the same price for a plugin as the entire logic studio. You obviously are intimate with the world of software development, so you tell me..what's going to take more money to create? I mean, as a professional in creating software, I would think you would see that for what ridiculousness it is.
...

Your first sentence says it all - I buy what I can afford. After that what are you doing? You're stealing. It does NOT get any simpler than that.

OK, you challeneged me so here are some answers on why a plug-in can cost that much. I can think of a couple of very legitimate ones right off the top of my head. First, to get the subtle and minute nuances in sound that you claim you can hear better than most in that $500 plugin, they may have to hire expensive audio engineering consultants to help explain the complex physics involved in why and how that effect happens in the real world and then help them translate that into a software model that accurately reflects it. Audio engineering consultants? Hmmmmmm .... think that kinda sounds expensive. Well, they most certainly are. They're part of the cost basis of that expensive plug-in. The people like Mutt Lang, George Martin, Quincy Jones, Alan Parsons, etc., who are that product's target market, can a) afford to pay for that expensive expertise, b) can use it extremely effectively, and c) deliver sonic results that will only come from outrageously expensive studios that I'm willing to bet no one on this BBS has at home. people like the vast majority of us here are NOT in the target market. And if your abilities and experience level actually are in the same league as those legneds, why bother stealing? Why can't you make enough with those skills to pay your suppliers for the tools you use to work your magic? Or if you do, why risk damaging your reputation by pirating software you use to work that magic? Shouldn't a carpenter pay for his hammers? Would he continue pull in a lot of customers if people found out he steals his tools? Wouldn't they wonder how he was ripping off THEM if he's doing it with his tools? I sure would.

Second, have you ever shaved? If so, I'll bet you bought a "razor" that was really pretty cheap. What you really bought was a cheap handle. It's the consumables - the actual (replaceable) blades that are the really expensive part. Ever buy milk? That's usually sold by a supermarket at below cost. It's a staple item that everyone needs to buy so pricing it very low helps get people in the stores. The loss on that item - milk - is then more than offset by the margin (which is VERY low in a supermarket, by the way) on the rest of the items in the store. Ever buy electronics like a TV, a computer, an stereo receiver in a brick-and-mortar store? The prices on those things are very similar to the kinds of deals you can get from any online retailer. They have to be in order for the store to survive. Where they "get you", assuming your view of the business world, is on accessories, niche items, etc. They have to do that in order to offset the very low margins on the items that people will comparison shop for on the internet. So what do you think the stores do with the relatively high markup on the other items? Line the pocket of the rich fat cat bastards running the store? hell no. They pay the salaries of the relatively low-paid people working there. Those are real world examples of my second point - a loss leader. The online retailers don't have those kinds of costs (or other high costs like an actual store). CompUSA failed at competing with the large online retailers because they couldn't make enough to pay those costs and still make enough to survive. Sustaining a business is a very difficult thing to do, oth short-term in the beginning and even more so long-term.

So think of your expensive plug-in this way. It's is a classic niche item, which is almost always going to be far more expensive than other items. Products that are more specialized, that take more highly-skilled expertise to develop, that are targeted at a much smaller market, that are expected to sell a relatively small unit, those kinds of items are typically going to have MUCH higher margins than the base product that will sell orders of magnitude more units. And a large percentage of those margins are almost always going to be put back into the development cycle of the core product - the bread-and-butter of their business. That's out of necessity in order to effectively and efficiently manage the overall costs of running the entire business. Only in VERY rare cases is it to gouge the little guy. And it's only in VERY rare cases that that kind of business model ("gouge as much and as often as you can") is sustainable. Those guys just don't for long.

So those are two very legitimate business reasons why the prices YOU say are outrageous and purposely screwing customers are part of a legitimate, honest, and SUSTAINABLE business plan. Software production is a business, plain and simple. The people who develop it are taking huge risks, often personal, to get a product to market and make something of it. I believe someone who takes that kind of personal risk and succeeds is entitled to enjoy their success with the profits they can make.

If people in the target market are willing to pay for the product then I STILL maintain that the product is NOT overpriced. Is an expensive, "overpriced" doctor who's an expert in the field entitled to charge very high rates? Today you may say "No way!!!", but someday when you have a medical problem that that overpriced doctor can solve with his many years of experience and research you may think differently. Obviously medical expertise and the need for it is a much more serious thing than the "need" for audio software, but the same idea applies. You're paying for the right to use software designed and created by some pretty talented people. An honest businessman and artist would understand there are reasons for those costs and pay for the tools he uses to get the most out of his craft. A dishonest business steals what he claims he "needs", despite not being the type of customer who is in the target market, but can't afford.

Nothing I've said here is different from anything I've said over a year ago (re-read my much earlier threads) so I'm done here for another year or so. And yet again, no one has come up with any real, legitimate info that countered anything I've said. All they've done is provide weak arguments in an attempt to cover up the fact that pirating software is ridiculously easy to do, and it's ridiculously difficult to NOT get caught doing, and it's ridiculously easy to avoid any penalties for doing it, and it's ridiculously easy to just say WTF and start doing it. You can learn a lot about a man by what he does when he knows no one is looking and he knows won't get caught. What do you think you've taught us about yourself?



Signing out ...

:D
 
Last edited:
\What do you think you've taught us about yourself?

That because I chose a road less traveled in my audio career, it tends to lead to less money as well. I am determined, and will do anything, to get a good result, and create good art, even if that means to download a plugin to get the result when I'm not able to afford it quite yet. (sure, I'll buy it, but just not able to quite yet). It means that, since our society in this part of the world, artists are very under appreciated, and as a result it makes it very difficult for artists who gravitate towards music or anything aural in nature, since those tools are so crazily above what many people can afford.


Your doctor analogy. Hell yes, I think it's wrong. ABSOLUTELY. I'm assuming you live in the US. The entire medical industry in the US is screwed up, and out there to serve big pharmaceutical companies, and to sustain ( yes sustain) terminal illnesses, as to ensure large cash flows for research, and harmful designer drugs. There is no good health care option for anyone who doesn't either have a lot of money, or has care through their job (which most jobs that the general population can get will try their damnedest to get away with not providing) Health should not be a big money game. The poor dying because they can't in a million years afford something as fundamental as health, while the wealthy get everything handed to them on a silver platter. The reality is, if I lived in the US, where health is considered a privilege for people who are financially well off, I probably would just end up dead from whatever disease for the lack of being able to pay for any such specialist. That sir, is the reality. Fortunately, though... I live in Canada. :D

You can't begin to understand, unless you have lived down down in the gutter, which is obvious from the types of analogies you are trying to prove your point with. I have been there, and it's change my perceptions of the world and people a great deal (I think for the better). Even if we accept the fact that piracy is stealing, why do you think it's primarily the folks who can't make ends meet? I mean, we've got to do something in order to create our art, and try to compete with people who have big money behind them. If you can't produce the results your client is looking for, you don't get the job. If they want an 808 drum sound, you have to give it to them, and quick. If they want it to sound vintage, you have to give that to them. Most of the people complaining the most about people who pirate just can't understand.
 
bump.... just because I can. I want to see bloodshed. I want to see death, destruction. Fucking gladiatorial combat... GO!
 
I would add that a large part of what makes some pieces of software expensive is the boutique factor---the price is kept high specifically to make everyone think it is somehow God's greatest gift to mankind so that people who can't afford it will want it even more. This kind of thinking drives piracy, which tends to lead to a lot of people having it who wouldn't have even bothered to download a cracked copy if it were cheaper, in effect, broadening the use base without actually broadening the customer base.

I'm of the opinion that it's a despicable practice, and I make it a point not to support software manufacturers who do so unless there are no viable alternatives (e.g. Adobe Photoshop), but I also don't pirate it, either; I know that pirating it is exactly what they want hobbyists to do. We shouldn't give them that win....
 
Hahaha at option 2... :P

I don't have any expensive recording software but if I did, I'd buy it :D
 
Um I'm actually guilty of downloading shitloads - music, games, movies, software - BUT.

If I really love the product I will end up buying a legal version of it. That's how I have my favorite band's CD collection, million disks Lord of the Rings/Blade Runner DVD etc. It's pretty much the same like catching up the tunes on radio or watching ficks on the TV - it's free, and if you don't like it you don't like it. Downloading is just the way of getting to hear/watch/try the product for me.

I've only started home recording just few weeks ago so yep - I've downloaded Cakewalk and Cubase. Didn't like the first and loved the second - alot more than Pro Tools I work with at university. So far this LE edition does the job for me, but as soon as Steinberg releases an update I'm going to order it.

Peace :D
 
this thread is hilarious in a way. Look how long it's been going, and how many replies to it. It's probably the longest running thread I've ever seen in a forum.

It just goes around in circles over and over... everyone pounding their chests and hurling insults at each other. lol. It was my first threat when registering here as well.

Welcome to the board. May it's lunacy be tolerable.
 
Haha well I've started a "Song Game" thread on Van Halen message board which has like 12,000 replies. Wow it's weird to be a newbie somewhere else - I hardly ever post anywhere other than 1-2 message boards.

Thanks for the welcome, I cant wait to start sharing my home recorded music on here after I'd be done with reading all mixing tips and tutorials !
 
wow...between 3 posts there's 9 pages of double spaced reading...

i would go buy a book by an author i know before i read 9 pages of text from anonymous message board posters
 
For Now...

I've just recently begun to record myself. I've played guitar for about 5 years now, Been drumming since 5th grade (and yet I'm still not that good at it...) and singing since birth. I wanted a chance to see what I could do with what I can do...make sense? Presently, I download everything. I'll be damned if I'm going to go drop $1000 on software/plugins/etc. unless I KNOW it's going to work for me. Add the fact that I'm 25 years old making less than $30K with a newborn child, and you understand that while I'm not "in the gutter" as Terra says, I'm really not too far away from it. I scrape together for months to afford a nice secondhand guitar. There's no way I can afford (at present) to buy software just to try it out. If I like the software, and I like what I can do with it, I won't hesitate down the road to pay the money for a legit copy.
 
There's no way I can afford (at present) to buy software just to try it out. If I like the software, and I like what I can do with it, I won't hesitate down the road to pay the money for a legit copy.

Then start with something you CAN afford - look at Reaper. It's fantastic, intuitive, powerful and inexpensive. And you can be legit instead of something less.
 
Funny you should mention that, because over the weekend, I dropped sonar in favor of reaper for that very reason. Less complex, less money, less headache (in general). Like I said, I'm new at this, so the simpler something is at the moment, the more comfortable I feel.
 
I tried reaper in bootcamp..it was allright, especially for the price, but I didn't like it nearly as much as Logic.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top