
ashcat_lt
Well-known member
I started with a crate amp and a Radio Shack microphone. That's neither here nor there.
I have a problem with the idea of deliberately compromising the source sound in order to make up for deficiencies in the recording chain. Sure, it is possible that you've just dialed in a completely suck tone and think it's the raddest thing ever. You'll figure it out at some point.
But assuming that you're not a total fuck up, and actually have a reasonable sense of how the guitar needs to sound for the song, then you dial in that tone at the amp. It is then the engineer's job to not fuck it up. If he sticks a 57 in front of it and smashes it to hell and then it sucks... Well, whose fault is that?
And yes I'm aware that in most cases on this forum the guitarist and engineer are the same person. The point remains.
I have a problem with the idea of deliberately compromising the source sound in order to make up for deficiencies in the recording chain. Sure, it is possible that you've just dialed in a completely suck tone and think it's the raddest thing ever. You'll figure it out at some point.

But assuming that you're not a total fuck up, and actually have a reasonable sense of how the guitar needs to sound for the song, then you dial in that tone at the amp. It is then the engineer's job to not fuck it up. If he sticks a 57 in front of it and smashes it to hell and then it sucks... Well, whose fault is that?
And yes I'm aware that in most cases on this forum the guitarist and engineer are the same person. The point remains.