I'm a fairly fast typist, peppered, so I have a clue as to how long it took you to write the above critique, and I'm therefore extremely,extremely grateful for your time.
I will attend to your observations ...
It's really quite curious. I've LONG been a contributor to such boards as this, and have mostly found posters to be quite helpful. But it always seems that a pattern emerges on various forums ... and I hate to say that I find such input as yours more rare than one would like to believe.
I am beginning to feel that all such venues are a bit ... spotty at best ... and in the end one must question whether it's justified to continue to contribute to any given forum. This is not a condemnation of any given forum/site ... as here I'm isolating a common trend I've observed after many years of contributing to such forums. So this isn't a pointed stab at the many individual threads here that go unattended ... it's just a general query regarding the "state of the forums" broadly.
The base question, I see, is: "How many songs/critiques/comments can a forum community really support?"
When a site becomes more popular, and hence, TONS of folks contribute their songs for assessment ... how many can truly be critiqued? No matter how good a particular tune is, there comes a limit/realistic restriction to the amount of folks viewing and the amount of folks qualified to comment.
How much time can be devoted to listening to other folk's productions when one is trying so hard in the limited free time one has ... to make their own?
It's a quandry ... I just watch sooooo many threads drop off the first few pages of this forum completely, non-warrantedly unanswered ... the only explanation is that people are just too preoccupied and busy to respond ...
... not scathing criticism, just realistic observation ... with questions.
Kev.